醉驾行为的严重性，不仅体现在其对公共安全所造成的危害，同时也体现在其产生的社会影响较大。由此，关于醉驾是否入刑的讨论，由来已久。加之，国际上的一些国家早已经通过刑法对醉驾进行法律规制。在这些发展背景的影响之下，我国《刑法修正案（八）》将醉驾行为规定为犯罪。但在醉驾入罪之后，关于该问题的探讨与争议却并没有平息，而是将焦点转移到了是否应该采取“一刀切”的态度，即无论情节与危害结果的不同，凡是醉驾行为则一律入刑。法律上缺乏明确规定，以及理论上的纷争，都使得关于醉驾的司法实践陷入困境。为了更好地为司法实践提供指引，我国通过相关的法律对于一些情形下的醉驾出罪进行了相应的规定，为醉驾的出罪提供了制度上的支持。然而，由于醉驾出罪相关问题规定的不够明确，使得醉驾出罪在司法实践中的效果并不良好，仍旧存在过度问题。本文对醉驾出罪进行研究，主要原因在于醉酒驾驶入罪的情况比较常见，危险驾驶构成犯罪的情况更加普遍。本文从醉驾行为的出罪角度出发，结合理论、法律制度以及具体实践三种角度对其进行分析，力求提出促进我国醉酒驾驶行为出罪路径完善的建议。

本文一共分为六个部分：从现状角度出发，主要是对醉酒驾驶及其入罪与出罪的现状进行分析，特别是对当前国内外关于此方面的研究现状与成果进行总结分析，为后续研究的展开提供指引与理论上的支撑。从理论研究角度出发，对于与醉酒驾驶出罪相关的基本问题进行分析，主要包括醉酒驾驶是否应该一律入罪、醉酒驾驶出罪是否具有必要性，以及醉酒驾驶出罪的理论基础与相关政策依据等。在对这些内容进行分析的基础上，能够帮助我们更好地对醉酒驾驶出罪路径进行分析。从实体法角度出发，对醉酒驾驶行为出罪的实体法路径进行分析，主要的研究内容包括醉酒型危险驾驶罪犯罪构成的判断、刑法第13条“但书”的适用，以及醉酒型危险驾驶罪共同犯罪的出罪路径等方面。从程序法角度出发，对醉酒驾驶行为出罪的程序法路径进行分析，主要包括醉驾案件中对于关键证据合法性的审查和判断、加大酌定不起诉的适用力度，以及暂缓起诉制度的设置三个方面。最后，从醉酒驾驶行为出罪的刑事立法完善、醉驾案件出罪后刑法与行政法的衔接两个方面出发，提出促进我国醉酒驾驶出罪路径完善的相关建议。

The seriousness of drunk driving has reflected in the harm it causes to public safety, but also in the huge social impact it produces. Therefore, the discussion about whether drunk driving should be sentenced to punishment has been around for a long time. In addition, some countries in the world have already adopted criminal laws to regulate drunk driving. Under the influence of these developmental backgrounds, my country's "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" defines drunk driving as a crime. However, after the crime of drunk driving, the discussion and controversy on the issue did not calm down. Instead, the focus shifted to whether a “one size fits all” approach should be adopted, that is, regardless of the difference in the plot and the harmful result, all drunk driving behaviors will be included. punishment. The lack of clear regulations in the law and theoretical disputes have caused the judicial practice of drunk driving into a difficult situation. In order to better provide guidance for judicial practice, my country has adopted relevant laws to provide corresponding regulations for the crime of drunk driving in some situations and provide institutional support for the crime of drunk driving. However, due to the lack of clarity on the related issues of the crime of drunk driving, the effect of the crime of drunk driving in judicial practice is not good or is there an excessive problem. This article studies the reasons for the crime of drunk driving. The main reason is that drunk driving is more common, and dangerous driving constitutes a crime more commonly. This article starts from the perspective of the crime of drunk driving, and analyzes it from three perspectives of theory, legal system and specific practice, and strives to put forward suggestions to improve the path of crimes of drunk driving in our country.