在本篇论文中，我集中讨论了对于吉尔?德勒兹在《资本主义与精神分裂：千高原》一书中首次提出的“层”这一概念的理解。“层”代表了提取和抽象，可以表现现代社会的状态，即被分化为各个层级，各个领域，各个范畴。全文遵循的总的逻辑顺序是“‘层’的概念”—“‘层’的图示”—“ 德勒兹对‘层’的态度”。 围绕着“什么是‘层’”这一问题，本文从两大方面着手讨论，一方面讨论了“层”、“层化-去层化”和“准层-副层”等相关概念，得出结论认为，“层” 这一概念正是从地质学那里借用而来，并分析得出“准层—副层”和“层化—去层化”的四个特征：“准层—副层”和“层化—去层化”在很大程度上互相替代；“准层”和“副层”之间界限模糊；“准层”和“副层”无法直接区分和辨别；“准层”和“副层”没有时间上和逻辑上的先后关系。另一方面本文将“根茎”和“褶皱”这两个并未出现在“层”的章节的概念纳入“层”的研究，认为这是德勒兹作为“层化”的对立面提出的两种模型。同时本文创新了研究方法，试图用图示的方法来表示这两种模型，其中涉及相关模型的区分，结论认为“根茎”模型是德勒兹理想的“层”的存在状态，而“褶子”处于“层”与“层”之间，是其实际的运动模式。 接着，在讨论“德勒兹对‘层’的态度”时本文认为，一方面从描述性的角度来看，德勒兹坚持“层”、“层化”、“去层化”都是同时存在而且必然存在的过程，并不存在一个单纯的只有一种运动的世界，只存在混杂的世界。另一方面，本文通过对德勒兹国家哲学的分析，论证了德勒兹不希望完全否定或肯定其中任意一种模型，他所做的最多的工作就是分析个中利弊，原因就在于在现实世界中这些模型都是同时出现和交织在一起的，因此德勒兹的态度可以说是“混杂的”。 最后，文章简要谈及了德勒兹用这一概念替换传统“结构”概念的用意，认为他是希望人们以一种综合的方式理解结构而非把结构当作现实的区分。另外还认为这一概念的提出本身具有解构主义和后现代主义的意味和意义。

In this paper, I focus on the understanding of the concept of "layer (strate)" first proposed by Gilles Deleuze in Capitalism and schizophrenia: a Thousand Plateau. In a way, “strate” means abstraction, which shows the condition of modern society: being separated into different stages, realms and categories. The overall logical order followed is "the concept of a layer"—"graphic demonstrations of ‘layer’ "—" Deleuzean attitudes towards the ‘layer’”. Focusing on the question of "what is ‘layer’", this paper discusses from two aspects. On one hand, the concepts of "layer", "stratification—destratification" and "parastrate—epistrate" is explained. The conclusion is drawn that the concept of "layer" is borrowed from geology, and the four characteristics of "parastrate—epistrate" and "stratification—destratification" are as follows: "parastrate—epistrate" and "stratification—destratification" replaces each other to a great extent; The boundary between "parastrate" and "epistrate" is blurred; "parastrate" and "epistrate" can not be directly distinguished; "parastrate" and "epistrate" have no temporal and logical sequential relationship. On the other hand, this paper innovates the research method, attempts to use the graphic method to express two kinds of models-"rhizome" model and "fold" model, which are put forward by Deleuze as the opposite of "stratification", which involves the distinction of the related models. At the same time, the author did not fully agree with Deleuze's attitude, and at the end of the paper put forward that "rhizome" model is the ideal state of layers’ existence, and that "fold" model, lying between layers, is the actual method of transformation among layers . In the second part, in discussing "Deleuzean attitude towards the ‘layer’", this paper believes that, on the one hand, from a descriptive point of view, Deleuze insists that "layer", "stratification" and "destratification" are both simultaneous and inevitable processes. There is no pure world where there is only one movement, the world is mixed. On the other hand, through the analysis of Deleuzean philosophy of nations, this paper proves that Deleuze does not want to completely deny or affirm any of these models. His only work is to analyze the pros and cons of each model. The reason is that in the real world, these models appear and interweave together at the same time, so Deleuze's attitude can be described as "mixed". Finally, the article briefly talks about the intention of Deleuze to replace the traditional concept of "structure" with this concept. He wanted people to understand structure in a comprehensive way rather than treat it as a realistic distinction. In addition, the concept itself has the references to deconstructivism and post-modernism.