- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 批判性思维与辩证逻辑的思维体系比较研究    

姓名:

 王翰莹    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 010104    

学科专业:

 逻辑学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 哲学硕士    

学位类型:

 学术学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 哲学学院    

研究方向:

 逻辑学    

第一导师姓名:

 陈磊    

第一导师单位:

 哲学学院    

提交日期:

 2024-06-25    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-27    

外文题名:

 A Comparative Study of Thinking System between Critical Thinking and Dialectical Logic    

中文关键词:

 批判性思维 ; 辩证逻辑 ; 思维体系    

外文关键词:

 Critical thinking ; Dialectical logic ; Thinking System    

中文摘要:

       在国家提出建设创新型国家计划之后,批判性思维越来越受到社会和学术界的重视。 批判性思维具有批判性的本质精神和实践性,注重从全面性角度考察事物,而辩证逻辑也是思维创新的重要理论和方法、强调实践性、注重事物之间的联系。批判性思维和辩证逻辑都在朝着应用逻辑的方向发展。虽然国内外有诸多的学者研究批判性思维和辩证逻辑,但是有关批判性思维与辩证逻辑比较的研究寥寥无几,大多数的研究是批判性思维与非形式逻辑的比较、辩证逻辑和形式逻辑的比较以及批判性思维与逻辑教学关系的论述。

      本文主要结合国内外关于批判性思维、辩证逻辑、批判性思维与逻辑学关系、辩证逻辑与逻辑学关系的研究现状,在借鉴和研读其他学者已有成果的基础上,通过对批判性思维和辩证逻辑的概念阐述和历史发展,发现并分析、探讨批判性思维与辩证逻辑之间相融相通的部分及其不同的地方。经过研究,得出:批判性思维与辩证逻辑在思维方法和理论体系上有许多相似之处,二者都要求在对立统一中把握对象、都注重考虑事物的全面性、在思考的过程中都会用到分析与综合的方法、都具有批判性的本质精神,是思维创新的重要理论和方法,并在朝着应用逻辑的方向发展。但是二者在思维方式和处理问题的角度上又有诸多的不同,批判性思维在运用分析与综合的方法时侧重于分析,处理问题时注重从局部入手,而辩证逻辑的重心在于综合分析的结果,注重对事物的整体把握。此外,二者理论重点、目标和根本任务也都是不同的。本文通过对二者进行比较,理清二者与逻辑学的关系,同时更好地发现它们各自的发展规律,认清发展趋势,最后也希望能够再次唤起学术界对辩证逻辑的研究,推动辩证逻辑和批判性思维的共同发展,并对后续的研究者提供一定的参考。

外文摘要:

 

   After the plan of building an innovative country is put forward, critical thinking has been paid more and more attention by society and academia. Critical thinking has the essence of critical spirit and practicality, focusing on examining things from a comprehensive perspective, while dialectical logic is also an important theory and method of thinking innovation, emphasizing practicality and focusing on the connection between things. Both critical thinking and dialectical logic are developing towards applied logic. Although many scholars at home and abroad have studied critical thinking and dialectical logic, there are few studies on the comparison between critical thinking and dialectical logic, most of the studies are the comparison between critical thinking and informal logic, dialectical logic and formal logic, and the discussion of the relationship between critical thinking and logic teaching.

   This paper mainly combines the current research status of critical thinking, dialectical logic, the relationship between critical thinking and logic, and the relationship between dialectical logic and logic at home and abroad, and on the basis of learning from and studying the existing achievements of other scholars, through the concept elaboration and historical development of critical thinking and dialectical logic. Discover, analyze and discuss the similarities and differences between critical thinking and dialectical logic. After research, it is concluded that: Critical thinking and dialectical logic have many similarities in thinking methods and theoretical systems. Both of them require to grasp the object in the unity of opposites, pay attention to the comprehensiveness of things, use analysis and synthesis methods in the process of thinking, and have critical essential spirit. They are important theories and methods for thinking innovation and are developing in the direction of applied logic. However, there are many differences between the two in the way of thinking and the angle of dealing with problems. Critical thinking focuses on analysis when using analytical and comprehensive methods, and focuses on local aspects when dealing with problems, while dialectical logic focuses on the results of comprehensive analysis and pays attention to the overall grasp of things. In addition, the two theoretical focus, goals and fundamental tasks are also different. By comparing the two, this paper clarifies the relationship between the two and logic, and at the same time better discovers their respective development laws and recognize the development trend. Finally, it also hopes to arouse the research of dialectical logic in the academic circle again, promote the common development of dialectical logic and critical thinking, and provide certain references for subsequent researchers.

参考文献总数:

 57    

馆藏号:

 硕010104/24005    

开放日期:

 2025-06-26    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式