党的十九大明确中国特色社会主义进入新时代，我国社会主要矛盾发生深刻变迁，已经由“人民日益增长的物质文化需要与落后的社会生产之间的矛盾”转化为“人民日益增长的美好生活需要与不平衡不充分的发展之间的矛盾”。乡村是中国发展不平衡不充分的聚集点，面对新发展理念下增长方式、增长结构和增长逻辑的重构，以及遭受“逆全球化”、新冠肺炎疫情带来的经济下行压力，党的十九大提出并此后不断深化强调了乡村振兴战略，以充分发挥中国乡村的“韧性”，补齐乡村发展的短板，加快构建以国内大循环为主体、国内国际双循环相互促进的新发展格局。因此，深入研究“乡村韧性”的生成、演进和治理变革问题，对于乡村振兴战略的有效实施、激发乡村“韧性”潜能，补齐中国经济社会发展中乡村这一短板，应对发展中各种可能风险，实现中华民族伟大复兴，具有重要意义。

习近平总书记多次强调，中国经济是一片大海，而不是一个小池塘，韧性好、潜力足、回旋余地大，而“乡村韧性”又是中国经济韧性的重要组成部分。本文借鉴国外有关“城市韧性”的大量研究，挖掘“韧性”概念的内涵、提炼出影响 “韧性”的因素，紧紧扣住“合理治理结构安排”是提升“韧性”程度的关键这一元素，结合中国“城乡二元结构”的现实存在以及乡村治理中薄弱环节这些国情特点，首次提出“乡村韧性”概念，即在城镇化、工业化、市场化、政策变迁等慢性扰动下，以“自组织性和创新性”形成为本质特征，建立起有效的乡村治理结构，依托其内在转型适应力形成修复能力，增强乡村经济社会发展能力，从而成为支撑乡村振兴的支柱，进而使乡村向更高阶段演化。

中国“乡村韧性”的固有属性不管是否受到外力的干扰，系统总能随着时间的变化不断发生着非确定性和非线性的演变，并呈现出复杂的自我涌现特征。本文重点关注乡村动态演化过程中的知识网络结构和制度安排变化，是如何提高或者降低系统应对潜在风险的能力，实现复杂的乡村社会——生态系统与外界环境共同进化并“弹向更好状态”，即最终实现乡村振兴。

结合影响“韧性”的因素并依据新时代乡村振兴“产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕”的总要求，选取了经济、政治、道德、审美四个维度考察 “乡村韧性”的生成与演进。四个维度之间有内在的逻辑关联，经济理性是乡村振兴的基础，政治自主是经济理性的保障，以天人、群己、义利为内涵的道德责任是对农村特有社会生态功能的审视，审美体验是农民实现自由的终极要求。经济理性、政治自主、道德责任、审美体验共同形塑“乡村韧性”。

    立足制度变迁、工业化、市场化、城镇化慢性扰动，围绕“乡村韧性”生成的“自组织性和创新性”本质特征，考察乡村复杂系统的转型适应力与修复力：（1）从农民主体性出发，对改革开放以来农民经济、政治、道德、审美维度进行全景式扫描，借用复杂系统适应性循环理论工具，分析乡村治理要素之间的连接度和潜力值，即与政府、市场、社会资本互动中农民主体性确立状况，认为农民还不能自主性、能动地、创造性地开发自身的美好生活，“乡村韧性”生成陷入困境，乡村系统陷入锁定。（2）分别对依靠农业产业创新和旅游两条进路转型实现乡村振兴案例进行扎根质性分析，明确了“乡村韧性”生成逻辑，认为党和政府战略引导、政策支持的诱致作用、村庄内生力量的激发和坚持农民主体性贯穿乡村振兴全过程，由此提出 “乡村韧性”生成与演进需要元治理变革形成转型适应力与修复力。提出坚持党和政府战略引导、以党组织为支点进行制度建设、把农民组织起来涵养核心价值观的变革思路，明确了要在经济、政治、道德、审美面向全面提升“乡村韧性”。

乡村作为复杂适应性系统，决定了“乡村韧性”生成与演进是一个渐进动态的过程。“乡村韧性”生成于乡村振兴实践中，但不可能通过一场运动来完成。“乡村韧性”生成最佳判断者是农民，最终旨归是创设农民向往的生活，实现共同富裕。

The Nineteenth National Congress of the Party made it clear that socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era and is in a new historical position, and the principal social contradictions in our country have undergone profound changes. It has been transformed from "the contradiction between the growing material and cultural needs of the people and backward social production" to "the contradiction between the growing needs of the people for a better life and unbalanced and inadequate development ".The countryside is the gathering point of China's unbalanced development. In the face of the reconstruction of growth mode, growth structure and growth logic under the new development concept, and the economic downward pressure brought by the "anti-globalization" and the epidemic situation of new crown pneumonia, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the strategy of rural revitalization, which has been continuously emphasized since then, in order to give full play to the "resilience" of Chinese villages and make up for the shortcomings of rural development. At the same time, we should speed up the construction of a new development pattern with the big domestic circulation as the main body and the domestic and international double circulation promoting each other.Therefore, it is of great significance to deeply study the evolution, generation and governance of rural resilience in the new era, to effectively implement the strategy of rural revitalization, to stimulate the potential of rural "resilience ", to make up for the short board of rural areas in China's economic and social development, to deal with all possible risks in development, and to realize the great rejuvenation of the central nation.

National President Xi Jinping has repeatedly stressed that China's economy is a sea, not a small pond. Good toughness, sufficient potential, large leeway, and "rural resilience" is an important part of China's economic resilience.This paper draws lessons from a large number of foreign studies on urban resilience, excavates the connotation of the concept of "resilience ", and extracts the factors that affect" resilience ". And closely around the "reasonable governance structure arrangement" is the key to enhance "resilience ", as well as the reality of China's" urban and rural dual structure "and the weak links in rural governance, the concept of" rural resilience "is first put forward：Under the chronic disturbance of urbanization, industrialization, marketization and policy changes， Specifically refers to the formation of "self-organization and innovation" as the essential characteristics, the establishment of an effective rural governance structure, enhance the adaptability, learning and transformation of rural economic and social development, thus forming a pillar to support rural revitalization.

The inherent attribute of "rural resilience" in China is that whether or not it is disturbed by external forces, the system can always evolve with the change of time with uncertainty and nonlinearity, and presents complex self-emergence characteristics.This paper focuses on the changes of knowledge network structure and institutional arrangement in the process of rural dynamic evolution, and the influence on improving or reducing the system's ability to deal with potential risks. And how to realize the complex rural society —— ecosystem and external environment co-evolution and "bounce to a better state ", that is, the ultimate realization of rural revitalization.

This paper is based on the formal system and urbanization changes, and according to the new era of rural revitalization "industrial prosperity, ecological livability, custom civilization，effective governance, rich life" general requirements, selects four dimensions of economy, politics, morality and aesthetics to investigate the "rural resilience ".There is an inherent logical association between the four dimensions. Economic rationality is the basis of rural revitalization, political autonomy is the guarantee of economic rationality, the moral responsibility with the connotation of heaven and man, group oneself and righteousness and profit is the examination of the unique social and ecological function of rural areas, and aesthetic experience is the ultimate requirement for farmers to realize freedom. Economic rationality, political autonomy, moral responsibility and aesthetic experience together shape "rural resilience ".

Based on the chronic disturbance of institutional change, industrialization, marketization and urbanization, and focusing on the two essential characteristics of "self-organization and innovation" generated by "rural resilience ", first, from the perspective of system and behavior, this paper makes a panoramic scan of the evolution process of farmers' economic, political, moral and aesthetic dimensions since the reform and opening up. Using the complex system adaptive cycle theory tool, this paper analyzes the connection degree and potential value between the elements of rural governance, that is, the establishment of farmers' subjectivity driven by government, social capital and market capital, and thinks that farmers can not develop their own good life autonomously, dynamically and creatively, which makes the generation of "rural resilience" into a dilemma.Secondly, we analyze the cases of rural revitalization based on the transformation of agricultural industry innovation and tourism, and clarify the logic of "rural resilience ", and think that the inducement of government strategic guidance and policy support runs through the whole process of agricultural innovation. The stimulation of village endogenous power is the key to rural revitalization.Therefore, it is suggested that the formation of "rural resilience" needs meta-governance reform, at the same time, it puts forward the reform ideas of adhering to the strategic guidance of the government, taking the party organization as the fulcrum to carry out the system construction, organizing the peasants to cultivate the core values and moral responsibility, and clarifies it is necessary to improve the "rural resilience in an all-round way in the economic, political, moral and aesthetic orientation ".

As a complex adaptive system, the evolution of "rural resilience" is a dynamic process, which is generated in the practice of rural revitalization, but can not be completed through a movement. It needs to permeate the economic, political, moral, aesthetic and other aspects of farmers. The ultimate goal is to create a life that farmers yearn for and achieve common prosperity.