诺齐克持有正义理论的逻辑起点与理论前提是不可侵犯的权利，持有正义理论则包含了关于私有财产正当性的三条原则，即获取正义原则、转让正义原则和矫正正义原则。获取正义原则主要吸收了洛克的劳动获取论和限制条款，对限制条款的表达进行了从强到弱的转换；历史的转让正义原则批评了其他主张再分配理论的目的——结果原则和模式化原则；矫正正义原则是在前两条原则失败的条件下被提出的。最后，本文一方面从理论角度，通过对自由定义的两种解释框架，分析持有正义理论内部的逻辑矛盾原因，另一方面从现实角度出发，指出持有正义理论必然因矫正正义原则在面对现实问题时的失败而无法完成其论证目标。

Nozick holds the logical starting point and theoretical premise of his theory of justice in holdings as the inviolable right. The theory of justice in holdings contains three principles, namely the just principle of initial acquisition, the just principle of transfer and the just principle of rectification. The just principle of initial acquisition mainly absorbs Locke’s theory, and transforms the expression of Lockean proviso from strong to weak. The historical principle of transfer criticizes other redistribution theories for end-state principles and patterned principles. Nozick’s just principle of rectification is only proposed under the condition that the first two principles fail. In the end, from the theoretical point of view, this paper, on the one hand, analyzes the causes of logical contradictions in the theory of justice in holdings through two interpretation frameworks of freedom. On the other hand, from the realistic point of view, it is pointed out that the theory of justice in holdings must be unable to complete its argumentation goal because of the failure of the just principle of rectification in the face of real problems.