《中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划纲要》中提出：要推进竞技体育人才培养体系建设，完善竞技体育人才选拔机制，提高竞技体育人才水平。近年来，优秀的学生篮球运动员层出不穷，不仅在职业赛场上发挥亮眼，在国家队中也不乏学生运动员的身影。可见，我国对于高校高水平运动队的建设、技术要求、专业能力有着较高期望，学生运动员对我国篮球后备人才培养的重要性日益增加，在我国篮球运动发展的道路上起着重要作用。高校篮球高水平运动队不仅是我国篮球人才选拔与培养的重要基地之一，也是推动我国篮球运动发展的中坚力量。在此背景下，高校女子篮球高水平运动队应积极提升运动技术水平，增强综合实力，为中国女篮提供更多优秀运动人才，助力中国篮球事业发展。

本研究运用TOPSIS-RSR法、录像观察法、对比分析法等研究方法，基于篮球攻防能力技术指标，对第23届CUBA女篮四强队伍攻防能力进行分析，结合篮球攻防能力特点以及实践经验，对各队存在的问题提出针对性的建议。为提高CUBA女篮队伍攻防能力，促进我国高校女子篮球竞技能力提升，提供一定的参考和借鉴。研究结论如下：

(1）第23届CUBA女子四强队伍中，清华大学RSR攻防能力等级达到A级，攻防Ci值0.5875，排名第一，是攻防能力最强的队伍；北京大学RSR攻防能力达到 B 级，攻防Ci值0.5109，排名第二；北京师范大学RSR攻防能力达到 B 级，攻防Ci值0.4844，排名第三；中国矿业大学攻防能力为 D 级，攻防Ci值是0.3265，排名第四，是最弱的队伍。

(2）北京师范大学、清华大学、北京大学的攻防类型是攻守平衡，但攻防能力水平不同，攻守平衡水平也有一定差异，在攻守两端，北京师范大学稳定性和综合性较强，灵活性和高效性较弱；清华大学综合性和高效性较强，稳定性较弱；北京大学综合性较强，稳定性较弱；攻守平衡的球队在比赛中既能够积极进攻，又能够有效防守，整体实力更加均衡。中国矿业大学的攻防类型是攻弱守强。攻防水平较低，防守能力较弱。在球队攻防能力差距较小时，心理素质和战术素养对比赛结果影响较大。

(3）对于攻击性较弱、个人强攻杀伤较小的球队，建议在训练中将技术训练与实战紧密结合，加强个人进攻技术训练，提升得分效率；对于防守中个人防守强度较小、防守整体性较弱的球队，建议在训练中加强个人防守技术和整体防守战术的针对性训练，提高防守练习的目标性和计划性；对于临场决策能力和解决攻防重难点能力较弱、替补球员较少的球队，建议在训练中高度重视备赛过程和球员体能储备，同时教练员要注重临场战术布置、针对性攻防策略调整，及时关注球员身心状态的变化；对于易受外界因素干扰、发挥不稳定的球队，建议在训练中提高球员抗压、抗干扰能力和基本战术素养同时教练员要注意制定适合球员特点的攻防战术，追求攻守两端相对平衡。

The 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China proposes to promote the construction of a competitive sports talent training system, improve the selection mechanism for competitive sports talent, and raise the level of competitive sports talent. In recent years, excellent student basketball players have emerged, not only playing brightly in the professional arena, but also in the national team. It can be seen that China has high expectations for the construction, technical requirements, and professional ability of college high-level sports teams, and student athletes are increasingly important to the training of basketball reserve talents in China, and play an important role in the development of basketball in China. High-level college basketball sports teams are not only one of the important bases for the selection and training of basketball talents in China, but also the backbone of promoting the development of basketball in China. In this context, college women's basketball high-level sports teams should actively improve their sports technology level and enhance their comprehensive strength to provide more excellent sports talents for Chinese women's basketball and help the development of Chinese basketball.

This study uses TOPSIS-RSR method, video observation method, comparative analysis method and other research methods to analyze the offensive and defensive ability of the top four teams of the 23rd CUBA women's basketball team based on the technical indexes of basketball offensive and defensive ability, combine the characteristics of basketball offensive and defensive ability and practical experience, and put forward targeted suggestions on the problems of each team. To improve the offensive and defensive ability of the CUBA women's basketball team and promote the improvement of the competitive ability of women's basketball in China's colleges and universities, it provides certain reference and reference. The findings of the study are as follows:

(1) Among the top four women's teams in the 23rd CUBA, Tsinghua University ranked first with RSR offensive and defensive ability grade A and offensive and defensive Ci value 0.5875, and was the team with the strongest offensive and defensive ability; Peking University ranked second with RSR offensive and defensive ability grade B and offensive and defensive Ci value 0.5109; Beijing Normal University ranked second with RSR offensive and defensive ability grade B and offensive and defensive Ci value 0.4844; Beijing University of Mining and Technology ranked Third; China University of Mining and Technology has the weakest team with the offensive and defensive capability of D level and the offensive and defensive Ci value of 0.3265.

(2) The offensive and defensive types of Beijing Normal University, Tsinghua University and Peking University are offensive and defensive balanced, but the offensive and defensive ability levels are different, and the offensive and defensive balance levels are also different. On the offensive and defensive ends, Beijing Normal University is more stable and comprehensive, and less flexible and efficient; Tsinghua University is more comprehensive and efficient, and less stable; Peking University is more comprehensive and less stable; the offensive and defensive balanced teams are The team with balanced offense and defense is able to both attack actively and defend effectively in the game, with more balanced overall strength. The type of offense and defense of China University of Mining and Technology is weak in offense and strong in defense. The level of offense and defense is lower and the defensive ability is weaker. When the gap between the team's offensive and defensive capabilities is small, the psychological quality and tactical quality have a greater impact on the outcome of the game.

(3) For teams with weaker offense and smaller individual strong offense kill, it is recommended to closely integrate technical training with actual combat in training, strengthen individual offense technique training and improve scoring efficiency; for teams with smaller individual defensive intensity in defense and weaker overall defense, it is recommended to strengthen individual defensive technique and overall defensive tactics targeting training in training to improve the targeting and planning of defensive practice; for For teams with weak decision-making ability and ability to solve difficult offensive and defensive problems, and few substitutes, it is recommended to pay great attention to the preparation process and players' physical reserve in training, while coaches should pay attention to the arrangement of tactics and adjustment of targeted offensive and defensive strategies, and pay attention to the changes of players' physical and mental state in time; for teams that are easily disturbed by external factors and play unstable, it is recommended to improve players' resistance to pressure, interference and basic tactical quality in training. At the same time, coaches should pay attention to the development of offensive and defensive tactics suitable for players' characteristics and pursue a relative balance between offensive and defensive ends.