政府公信力是政府合法性的重要衡量指标，也直接关系到政府的治理效能。政府公信力就是政府赢得公众信任的能力。良好的制度设计和规范政府行为主体的行为，是提高公众信任的关键要素。领导干部个人有关事项报告制度是党内监督的一项重要制度，既可以规范领导干部的行为，也是提高公众信任的重要举措。我国领导干部个人有关事项报告制度从 1995 年颁布以来，经过了六次修订完善，许多地方政府也进行了大量实践探索。赢得公众信任是政府治理的重要目标，如何持续推进领导干部个人有关事项报告制度改革是各级政府关心的重要现实问题。很多学者对这项制度的法理基础、实施的现实动因、未来改革方向等方面进行了探索，但是对于这项制度如何改革以更好地促进公众信任（制度信任、组织信任、人际信任）有待学界进一步研究。

鉴于此，本研究期望探讨领导干部个人有关事项报告制度中有哪些关键要素会对公众信任产生影响，分析这些关键要素如何协同才能提高公众信任水平，并为制度改革提供建议。首先，通过对我国出台的领导干部个人有关事项报告制度相关政策文件、学者关于领导干部个人有关事项报告制度改革研究的文献进行梳理，并通过访谈检验文献梳理结果的可靠性，最终确定了申报主体、申报事项、申报时间、抽查核实、信息公开、社会监督六个影响公众信任的前因条件变量。其次，基于问卷星平台，采用随机情境实验问卷的方式获取了 1151 份有效样本数据。最终，采用清晰集定性比较分析（csQCA）研究方法探讨了领导干部个人有关事项报告制度中六个关键要素（即前因条件变量）产生高公众信任的组态，并为领导干部个人有关事项报告制度的改革提供方向性建议。

数据处理与分析的结论如下：（1）公众信任的高低与否并非是单一条件变量决定的，而是受到多个条件变量的影响，不同改革路径之间具有相互补充或替代的关系。（2）本研究共发现了三种导致高公众信任的条件组态：主体范围扩大型、信息对外公开型、监督全面强化型。在主体范围扩大型组态中，申报主体与抽查核实两个条件变量发挥了核心作用，信息公开发挥了辅助作用；在信息对外公开型组态中，信息公开发挥了核心作用，申报事项、申报时间、社会监督发挥了辅助作用；在监督全面强化型组态中，申报事项、申报时间、社会监督发挥了核心作用，申报主体、抽查核实发挥了辅助作用。（3）本研究发现公众信任结果的高低具有因果非对称性，即产生低公众信任的原因和产生高公众信任的原因并不是完全相反的。基于上述三点结论，本研究为不同地方政府依据自身实际情况进行领导干部个人有关事项报告制度改革提供了三种路径，即主体范围扩大型改革、信息对外公开型改革和监督全面强化型改革。

Government credibility is an important measure of government legitimacy, but also directly related to the governance efficiency of the government. Government credibility is the government's ability to win public trust. Good system design and standardizing the behavior of government actors are the key elements to improve public trust. The reporting system of leading cadres on relevant matters is an important system for intra-party supervision. It can not only regulate the behavior of leading cadres, but also is an important measure to improve public trust. Since its promulgation in 1995, the personal matters report system of Chinese leading cadres has been revised and improved six times, and many local governments have also conducted a lot of practical exploration. Winning public trust is an important goal of government governance. How to continuously promote the reform of the reporting system of leading cadres' personal matters is an important practical issue concerned by governments at all levels. Many scholars have explored the legal basis of this system, the practical motivation for its implementation, and the direction of future reform, but how to reform this system to better promote public trust (institutional trust, organizational trust, interpersonal trust) needs further study. In view of this, this study is expected to explore what key elements in the reporting system of leading cadres' personal matters will have an impact on public trust, analyze how these key elements can be coordinated to improve the level of public trust, and provide suggestions for system reform. First of all, by sorting out the policy documents on the reporting system of leading cadres and scholars' literatures on the reform of the reporting system of leading cadres' personal matters, and testing the reliability of the literature sorting results through interviews, Finally, six antecedent condition variables that affect public trust are determined: the subject of declaration, the items declared, the time of declaration, random check and verification, information disclosure and social supervision. Secondly, based on the questionnaire Star platform, 1151 valid sample data were obtained by means of randomized situational experimental questionnaire. Finally, the clear set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) research method is used to discuss the configuration of six key elements (i.e., antecedent condition variables) in the reporting system of leading cadres personal related matters to generate high public trust, and to provide directional suggestions for the reform of the reporting system of leading cadres personal related matters. The conclusions of data processing and analysis are as follows: (1) The level of public trust is not determined by a single conditional variable, but is affected by multiple conditional variables. Different reform paths are mutually complementary or alternative. (2) Three conditional configurations leading to high public trust were found in this study: large expansion  of subject scope, open information to the outside world, and comprehensive strengthening of supervision. In the large-scale configuration with the expansion of subject scope, the two conditional variables of declaration subject and random check and verification play the core role, and information disclosure plays the auxiliary role. In the configuration of information opening to the outside world, information opening plays a core role, declaration of items, declaration time, social supervision plays a supplementary role. In the configuration of comprehensive strengthening supervision, declaration items, declaration time and social supervision play a core role, while declaration subject, random check and verification play a supplementary role. (3) This study finds that the results of public trust have causal asymmetry, that is, the reasons for low public trust and high public trust are not completely opposite. Based on the above three conclusions, this study provides three approaches for different local governments to carry out the reform of the reporting system of leading cadres' personal matters according to their own actual conditions, that is, the large-scale reform to expand the scope of the main body, the reform to open information to the outside world and the reform to comprehensively strengthen supervision.