近些年来，我国经济发展迅速，人民的生活质量不断提高，机动车的保有量不断增多。而由汽车数量的增多所引发的社会问题相应地也越来越多，其中最引人注目的就是交通肇事案件的频发。司法机关在处理肇事案件时发现，越来越多的肇事司机意图偷梁换柱，逃避法律追究。2010年12月在浙江省乐清市发生的费良玉交通肇事后找人顶罪的案件再一次引发了人们对顶罪和替罪行为的思考。交通肇事案件中，肇事者在交通事故发生后,找人顶罪的对象各有不同,可能是在案发现场的同车人，也可能是对事故完全不知情的肇事者亲友；而替别人顶罪的动机纵然千差万别，但其终极的目的却只有一个：帮助在交通肇事案件中真正的交通肇事者逃避法律的追究。无论是找人顶罪的行为还是替别人顶罪的行为，都是严重扰乱司法机关正常刑事诉讼活动的行为，都应该被依法查处。为了能够正确地对交通肇事冒名顶罪案件进行处理，从而尽量减少冒名顶罪案件的发生，有必要就该类案件如何处理的问题进行认真探讨。对于这类案件的处理，不论在是理论还是实务中都存在很多争议，尤其是在肇事者和替罪者的行为定性问题上就更是如此，这对案件的正确处理造成诸多困扰。笔者对费良玉交通肇事案的案情进行了概述，并结合《刑法》以及相关司法解释中的有关规定，参考法院审判实例并结合当今学术界的诸多争议观点,从“费良玉交通肇事案”这一典型的实际案例出发,对该案所涉及的争议焦点、案件所涉犯罪嫌疑人的定性问题进行了深入分析：第一, 费良玉交通肇事后找人顶罪的行为是否能认定为“逃逸”；第二, 对于费良玉的行为应当认定为一罪还是实行数罪并罚；第三,替罪者为别人顶罪该如何定性。肇事人在肇事后找人顶罪的行为因其主观上具有逃避法律追究的目的，客观上又实施了积极的“逃逸”行为，符合交通肇事逃逸的主客观构成要件，可以认定为“交通肇事逃逸”，对其顶罪行为无需实行数罪并罚。替罪者向司法机关提供虚假陈述意图通过自己的认罪行为为真正的犯罪人脱罪，其行为完全符合包庇罪的构成要件，应该以包庇罪定罪处罚。交通肇事作为中国进入汽车时代后一个长期存在并难以解决的热点问题,已然成为困扰大众日常生活的必须解决的急迫问题。而肇事人肇事后找人顶罪，无疑是加大了对交通肇事案处理的难度，使本来无罪的人也牵扯进案件中来，犯罪的恶性显著增强。通过对费良玉交通肇事案的分析与思考,笔者力求从法律层面进行认真梳理，努力探求对这类问题的准确认定，以期能够对司法机关办理相关案件有一定的帮助。

In recent years, as China's rapid economic development, along with the increasing number of vehicles in the country, Traffic Accident-prone often happen , the judiciary in handling accident cases found that a growing number of driver intent perpetrating a fraud, to avoid legal action. After FeiLiangyu traffic accident cases to find someone scapegoat occurred in December 2010 in Yueqing City, Zhejiang again raised the specter of rap and alternative thinking crimes, criminal in traffic accidents, traffic accidents occur in the perpetrators find someone to scapegoat; some strokes are the same car people, and some people really Hajime friends and family, and some drivers may also be leading to its leadership scapegoat; certainly motivation may vary, but there is only one ultimate purpose : traffic is to help the real perpetrators to evade legal accountability. Of course, whether it is to find someone to scapegoat scapegoat for other people's behavior or behavior, are seriously disrupting the normal activities of the judiciary in criminal proceedings, should be punished according to law, in order to be able to properly drop the charges bogus traffic accident cases are processed, and then accurately recurrence combat bogus traffic perpetrators and scapegoat people, so try to avoid false scapegoat of the case, there is the question of how such cases need to be handled carefully discussed.For such cases , whether theoretical or practical realm exists a lot of controversy , especially on the issue of the perpetrators and the qualitative behavior of persons for the crime , which is the proper handling of cases caused a lot of trouble. The author of the merits of the case for a detailed overview ; combined with relevant provisions of the " Criminal Law " and relevant judicial interpretations , refer to the trial court and combined with many examples of controversial point of view of today's academia , from the " FeiLiangyu Traffic Accident " is typical the actual case starting on the focus of controversy involved in the case , the case in question the suspects to carry out in-depth analysis of qualitative issues ; mainly has the following problems: first, the FeiLiangyu traffic accident whether someone can act scapegoat identified as " escape " ; second, the FeiLiangyu 's behavior should be recognized as a crime or to implement graft ; third, for the sins of others scapegoat for how qualitative issues ; The perpetrators after for the behavior of the rap because of its subjective have escape the law shall be investigated for the purpose of, objectively and implemented a positive "escape" behavior, accord with the subjective and objective constitutive requirements of hit-and-run, can be regarded as "hit-and-run", take the rap for its behavior without a combined punishment for several crimes. Patients fall to the judicial organ to provide false statements attempt by his own confession, act as a true criminal its behavior completely accords with the constitutive requirements of crime of concealing the murder, should with crime of concealing the murder convicted and punished.China traffic accident as a car enters the era of long-standing and difficult to resolve hot issues, has become an urgent problem plagued public mass of everyday life that must be addressed, however, to find someone to drop the charges after the accident perpetrators undoubtedly increased the traffic accident difficulty handling the case, was originally implicated innocent people to cases of malignant significantly enhanced crime; through analysis and thinking on charges FeiLiangyu Traffic Accident, the author seeks to carefully comb from a legal perspective, which will be easily confuse the issues one by one comb clear effort to explore such issues accurately identified in order to be able to handle the relevant judicial cases have some help.