- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 公立中小学管理中的教师参与研究:类型、程度及影响因素    

姓名:

 宋婷娜    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 中文    

学科代码:

 120403    

学科专业:

 教育经济与管理    

学生类型:

 博士    

学位:

 教育学博士    

学位类型:

 学术学位    

学位年度:

 2022    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 教育学部    

研究方向:

 教育管理    

第一导师姓名:

 程凤春    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学教育学部    

提交日期:

 2022-01-13    

答辩日期:

 2021-12-23    

外文题名:

 Research on Teacher’s Participation in Public Primary and Secondary School Management: Types, Levels and Influencing factors    

中文关键词:

 教师参与 ; 学校管理 ; 期望参与 ; 实际参与    

外文关键词:

 Teacher Participation ; School Management ; Desired Participation ; Actual Participation    

中文摘要:

    党的十八届三中全会将“推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化”确定为全面深化改革的总目标,开启了加快制度建设和治理能力建设的新时代。推进教育治理体系和治理能力现代化,建立现代化的学校制度,是学校发展的不竭动力,也是学校发展的方向和目标。本研究立足于我国教育综合治理能力现代化和建设现代学校制度的时代背景下,运用参与式管理理论、决策参与差异模型、公民参与阶梯理论为支撑,采用量化为主的混合研究方法,在政策文本、已有文献的基础上,对20位公立中小学教师进行深入访谈,借助Nvivo11.0构建了教师参与的内容框架,编制了公立中小学教师参与量表,并开展试测,运用修正后的量表在北京地区开展正式问卷调查,共回收有效教师问卷1893份,运用描述性统计分析、方差分析、多元线性回归分析、路径分析等方法,对公立中小学管理中的教师参与类型、参与程度和影响因素进行了研究,并对数据统计结果与访谈资料的分析结论进行相互印证。研究的主要结论如下:
    首先,本研究借鉴决策参与差异模型,构建了教师参与内容的四象限分类图,将教师参与内容分为“教师期待参与未能参与的事务”、“教师期待参与且参与了的事务”、“教师不想参与却参与了的事务”及“教师不想参与且不用参与的事务”四种类型。在分类基础之上,计算“期待参与”与“实际参与”的差值,并按人数多少进行降序排列。除此之外,对参与不同类型的教师群体特征进行描述分析。整合上述结果发现:(1)教师期待参与未能参与的事务包括“学校章程/规章制度的拟定”、“教师绩效工资方案的制定与修改”、“学校教师福利的分配”和“学校长期目标/发展规划的拟定”。参与这一类型事务的教师群体多为在初中任教的、年纪轻、教龄短、且具有硕士学历的普通教师。(2)教师期待参与且参与了的事务包括“教研组的集体研讨活动”、“学校教学计划的制定”、“确定学校校本教研的内容与形式”和“校内考试(命题、监考、评卷)安排”。参与这一类型事务的教师群体多为在城市小学区级示范校任教的、年龄在31~40岁之间、有10年以上工作经验的、且处于学校中层领导的教师。(3)教师不想参与且不用参与的事务包括“新教师的聘任”、“学生班级设置及事宜”、“校务计划、预算编制及经费使用事宜”、“学校经费的支出/使用事宜”、“班主任安排”和“学校教学设备/书刊的购置”。参与这一类型事务的教师群体多为年纪大、教龄长、男性普通教师。(4)教师不想参与却参与了的事务包括“校长工作的评议”。参与这一类型事务的教师群体多为在乡镇初中任教的、41岁以上、具有20年以上工作经验的、且具有高级职称的年级组长/学科组长/教研组长。
    其次,目前公立中小学教师参与程度以“知道情况”和“提供意见看法”的象征性参与为主,尚未达到“参与讨论”、“参与决策”的实质性参与程度,教师参与程度需要进一步提升。通过不同背景因素对教师参与程度的差异检验可知:小学教师在行政事务、教学事务、总务上的参与程度显著高于初中和高中;学校规模不同的教师在教学事务上的参与程度产生显著差异,大致体现为教师所在学校规模越大,教师在教学事务上的参与程度就越高;学校办学质量不同的教师在行政事务和教学事务上的参与程度产生显著差异,区级示范校的教师参与程度显著高于普通学校教师。而不同性别、学历的教师在学校管理的各项事务上的参与程度并未呈现出显著差异,不同年龄、教龄、职称、职位的教师在学校管理的各项事务上的参与程度均存在显著差异。
    最后, 本研究对影响教师参与的个体层面因素及学校组织层面因素进行了分析。结果表明,在教师个体层面,教师的参与意愿较高,参与能力处于中等程度,参与动机得分较低。通过多元回归分析发现,教师的参与意愿和参与动机对教师参与有较强的预测力,即那些参与意愿越强、参与动机越大的教师,在学校管理事务上的参与程度就越高。在学校组织层面,学校制度和学校组织氛围的得分均处于中等偏上程度。实证数据表明,学校制度和组织氛围能够显著的正向影响教师参与,意味着学校的管理制度越完善,支持性组织氛围越浓,则学校的教师在学校管理事务上的参与程度就越高。整合教师个体层面和学校组织层面的影响因素对教师参与的预测效应发现,学校组织因素在影响教师参与的因素中起到更为重要的作用,其预测效应大于教师个体层面因素。教师个体因素在学校组织因素对教师参与的影响过程中起部分中介作用。
    基于实证研究,本研究提出了以下对策建议:首先,学校应该紧扣教师职业发展特征,针对不同群体特征的教师精准施策以激发教师发展动力。其次,学校应该重视教师参与的激励机制建设,以期激发教师参与的意愿及动机。再次,学校应致力于完善现行教师参与制度,健全完善教师参与的组织制度、公开制度及反馈制度,以保障教师的参与权、知情权及监督权。最后,学校应营造教师参与学校管理的积极氛围,重塑利益相关者角色。一方面,校长角色应从命令者走向支持者。另一方面教师角色应从旁观者走向参与者。

外文摘要:

The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee sets "promoting the modernisation of our national governance system and capacity" as the general goal of the comprehensive deepening reform, which opens up a new era of accelerating system building and governance capacity building. Promoting the modernization of the educational governance system and capacity and establishing a modern school system are the inexhaustible driving force for school development, as well as the direction and goal of school development.Based on the background of the era of modernising China's comprehensive educational governance capacity and building a modern school system, this study focuses on the issue of the types, levels and influence factors of teachers' participation in school management in public primary and secondary schools.Based on participatory management theories and models of differences in decision-making participation, etc., the study adopts a mixed research approach with a quantitative focus. Based on policy texts and existing literature, the study conducts in-depth interviews with 20 public primary and secondary school teachers, constructs a content framework for teacher participation in school management with the help of Nvivo11.0, and develops a teacher participation scale for public primary and secondary schools. A pilot test is conducted and 119 valid questionnaires are collected, and the scale is revised based on the results of the pilot test. The revised scale is used to conduct a formal questionnaire survey in Beijing, and a total of 1893 valid teacher questionnaires are collected. Using descriptive statistical analysis, analysis of variance and multiple linear regression analysis and path analysis, the study examines the types of teacher participation, levels of participation and influencing factors in public primary and secondary schools, and cross-checked the statistical results with the findings from the analysis of interview data. The main findings of the study are as follows:
        Firstly, the study constructs a four-quadrant diagram about the teachers' participation contents, drawing on the model of differences in decision-making participation. The four quadrants of teacher participation are “issues that teachers expect to participate in but not participate in ” “issues that teachers expect to participate in and participate in ”, “issues that teachers do not want to participate in but participate in” and “issues that teachers do not want participate in and do not need to participate in”. On the basis of classification, calculate the difference value between "expected participation" and "actual participation", and arrange it in descending order according to the number of people.In addition, the characteristics of teacher groups participating in different types are described and analyzed.Combined with the above findings, the results are :(1) the affairs that teachers expect to participate in but not participate in include "drafting of school constitution/rules and regulations", "formulation and modification of teacher performance pay plan", "distribution of school teachers' welfare" and "drafting of school long-term goals/development plan".Most of the teachers participating in this type of affairs are young, short of teaching experience and ordinary teachers with master's degrees who teach in junior middle schools.(2) the affairs that teachers expect to participate in and actually participate in include"collective discussion activities of teaching and research group", "formulation of school teaching plan", "determination of the content and form of school-based teaching and research" and "arrangement of school examinations (proposition, invigilation and marking)".Most of the teachers participating in this type of affairs are teachers in the middle leadership of the school, aged between 31 to 40, with more than 10 years of work experience, who teach in demonstration schools at the district level of urban primary schools.(3) The affairs that teachers do not want to participate in and do not have to participate in include "The appointment of new teachers", "student class setup matters", "school affairs plan, budget preparation and funds use matters", "school funds expenditure/usage matters", "head teacher arrangement" and "school teaching equipment/books and periodicals purchase".Most of the eachers paticipating in this type of affairs are older, male and with longer teaching experience.(4) The affairs that teachers do not want to participate in but participate in include "review of the principal's work".Most of the teachers participating in this type of affairs are grade group leaders/subject group leaders/teaching and research group leaders who are over 41 years old and have more than 20 years of working experience with senior titles.
        Secondly, the current level of participation of teachers in public primary and secondary schools is mainly symbolic in the sense of being 'informed' and 'providing opinions', but not yet substantive in the sense of ' participate in discussions' and ' participate in decision-making'. "The level of teacher participation needs to be further increased. Through the test of the difference of teachers' participation in different background factors, it can be seen that: teachers' participation in administrative affairs, teaching affairs and general affairs is significantly higher in primary schools than in junior high schools and high schools; teachers' participation in teaching affairs varies significantly by school size, with the larger the school, the higher the level of participation in teaching affairs; teachers' participation in administrative affairs and teaching affairs varies significantly by school quality. Teachers' participation in administrative and pedagogical matters is differed significantly by the quality of the school, with teachers in district-level model schools being significantly more participate in than teachers in ordinary schools. However,There are no significant differences in the level of participation of teachers with different genders and educational backgrounds in school management, while there are significant differences in the degree of participation of teachers with different ages, teaching ages, professional titles and positions.
       Finally, the study analyses the factors influencing teacher participation at both the individual teacher and school organisation levels. At the individual teacher level, teachers' willingness to participate is high, their ability to participate is moderate, and their motivation to participate is low. Multiple regression analysis reveals that teachers' willingness to participate and motivation to participate has a significant positive predictive effect on teacher participation, it means that the stronger teachers'willingness to participate and the higher their motivation to participate, the higher teachers' participation in school management.At the school organisation level, both school systems and school organisational climate are found to be of moderate to high level. The empirical data suggests that school systems and school climate have a significant positive predictive effect on teacher participation,it means that the more perfect the school management system and the stronger the supportive organizational atmosphere, the higher the level of teachers' participation in the school management affairs.Integrating the predictive effects of individual and organisational factors on teacher engagement, it is found that organisational factors play a more important role in influencing teacher engagement, and their predictive effects are greater than those at the individual level.Teachers' individual factors play a partial mediating role in the influence of school organization factors on teachers' participation.
        Based on the empirical research, this study proposes the following countermeasures: Firstly, Schools should strictly follow the characteristics of teacher career development,and make precise policies for teachers with different group characteristics to stimulate teacher development motivation.Secondly,schools should attach importance to the construction of incentive mechanism for teachers' participation, in order to stimulate the willingness and motivation of teachers' participation.Thirdly, the school should be committed to improving the current teacher participation system, as well as improving the organization system, public system and feedback system of teacher participation, on order to guarantee teachers' right to participate, right to be informed and right to supervise.Finally, schools should create a positive atmosphere for teachers to participate in school management and reshape the role of stakeholders.On the one hand, the role of principal should be shifted from dictator to supporter.On the other hand, the role of teachers should be changed from spectator to participator.

参考文献总数:

 187    

馆藏地:

 图书馆学位论文阅览区(主馆南区三层BC区)    

馆藏号:

 博120403/22001    

开放日期:

 2023-01-13    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式