- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 大学生成人依恋内部工作模型的结构和变化    

姓名:

 王斐    

保密级别:

 公开    

学科代码:

 040201    

学科专业:

 基础心理学    

学生类型:

 博士    

学位:

 教育学博士    

学位年度:

 2009    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 心理学院    

研究方向:

 人格心理与咨询    

第一导师姓名:

 许燕    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学    

提交日期:

 2009-06-01    

答辩日期:

 2009-05-22    

中文摘要:
本研究在成人依恋理论的基础上,对依恋理论的核心概念——内部工作模型的内涵和影响因素进行了研究。首先,研究一根据依恋理论编制了内部工作模型外显层面的测量问卷和内隐层面的EAST测量工具;研究二在对依恋内部工作模型的外显和内隐层面内涵进行描述的基础上,进一步比较了不同依恋风格个体内部工作模型的差异;接下来,研究三和研究四分别探讨了安全基地图式启动和关系事件回忆积极解释对内部工作模型和相关关系变量的积极作用。研究结果如下:内部工作模型外显层面的测量问卷共包含22个题项,为二阶二因子结构,包含自我模型和他人模型两个高阶因子,自我模型分为一般自我和人际自我,他人模型分为他人善意、他人可得和他人支持三个二阶因子,问卷具有较好的信度和效度指标,符合心理测量学要求。内部工作模型的内隐层面测量程序能够得到独立的内隐自我模型和他人模型分数,信度指标符合要求。(1) 内部工作模型外显层面,安全型个体的一般自我、人际自我、他人可得和他人支持维度均显著高于其他非安全依恋风格个体,在他人善意维度与其他三种非安全依恋风格个体间不存在显著差异;焦虑型个体的一般自我低于安全型个体,人际自我高于恐惧型和回避型个体,他人善意维度高于恐惧型;超脱型个体的他人模型、他人可得和他人支持均低于安全型,人际自我低于安全型和焦虑型;恐惧型个体的一般自我、他人可得和他人支持均低于安全型,人际自我低于安全型和焦虑型,他人善意低于焦虑型。(2) 内部工作模型内隐层面,安全型个体的与其他三种非安全依恋风格不存在显著的差异;焦虑型个体的内隐他人模型得分显著高于恐惧型。(3) 与中性启动相比,安全基地启动能够使被试对中性刺激和关系质量的评价更加积极。安全基地启动对内部工作模型的作用受到被试依恋回避程度的调节,对于低依恋回避的被试,通过安全基地的启动能够提高个体的自我模型和他人模型得分。(4) 积极重构条件被试的内部工作模型外显层面均边缘显著地高于无关事件回忆条件,细节再现条件下,被试积极情绪显著高于无关事件回忆;积极重构条件被试对消极关系事件的归因和关系满意度比细节回忆条件和无关回忆条件积极。
外文摘要:
Based on the adult attachment theory, the present study focus on the construction and influencing factors of internal working model (IWM), one of the core concepts in attachment theory. Study 1 develops the questionnaire and the program to explore the explicit and implicit component of IWM separately, study 2 farther analyses the difference in IWM among people with different attachment styles, study 3 testifies the potential positive effects of subliminal prime of secure base on IWM and other relational variables, study 4 proves the potential positive effects of re-explain of relational events on IWM and other relational variables. The results are as follows:(1) The questionnaire of explicit component is two order five factors construction which contains 22 items. Two higher order factors are self model and other model, while the self model contains 2 factors of general self and interpersonal self and the other model contains 3 factors of goodwill, availability, supportive of others. The questionnaire has good reliability and validity. The program which assessed the implicit component of IWM follows Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. The good reliability and independent scores of implicit self and other model is obtained.(2) In the explicit models, secure people has higher score on general self, interpersonal self, availability of others, supportive of others than other attachment styles while goodwill of others has no significant difference with other attachment styles. Preoccupied people have higher score on interpersonal self than fearful and dismissing, on the mean time, higher score on goodwill of others than fearful. (3) In the implicit models, secure people has no significant difference with other attachment styles, while Preoccupied people have higher score on implicit other model than fearful people.(4) Compared with neutral condition, prime secure base schema makes the appraisal of neutral stimulus and Nepali more positive. The effect of prime secure base moderates by the avoidance of attachment and the prime can improve the scores of explicit self and other model only in low attachment avoidance person. (5) Re-explain the relational event on the positive way makes the explicit IWM marginal significant higher than recall irrespective event or only recall the relational event in detail. On the detail condition, subjects’ positive mood is higher than irrespective event recall. The attribution of negative relational events of subjects in re-explain condition better than detail recall and irrespective event recall conditions.
参考文献总数:

 96    

馆藏地:

 图书馆学位论文阅览区(主馆南区三层BC区)    

馆藏号:

 博040201/0909    

开放日期:

 2009-06-01    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式