元代是《四書》學形成與發展的重要時期，元代《四書》學上承宋學，下啟明、清，具有明顯的承先啟後作用。因元代社會政治的特殊性，學界一直以來對元代經學的研究和關注相對較少，元代《四書》學特別是《四書》文獻的揭示和研究方面更顯薄弱，有待進一步提高和深化。 本文的研究範圍大致界定在1276至1368年，約90餘年的時間內（北方金朝統治區以1234為上限），重點揭示和研究元儒《四書》類詮釋著作，主要採用文獻學和經學史研究、整體研究和個案研究相結合的方法，深入揭示元代《四書》文獻的整體面貌和個體特徵，對元代《四書》文獻特別是現存文獻進行系統的梳理和研究。 上編四章，總論元代《四書》文獻的興盛及其社會背景，元代《四書》文獻的編撰與傳播，並對元代《四書》文獻若干問題集中進行考辨，總結元代《四書》學及其文獻的特色與歷史價值。 有元一代，朱子學得到進一步發展，尤其在《四書》學領域，幾乎成為朱熹《四書章句集注》的一家之學。“四書”之名起於宋代，但普遍以“四書”作為書名是在元代。《四書》之學發端於二程，終成於朱熹，在元代實現了官學制度化，《四書章句集注》也逐步走向經典化，《四書》地位獲得了極大提升，甚至取得了與《五經》並駕齊驅的地位。《四書》學真正繁榮是從元代開始的，在內、外因素共同作用之下，特別是通過與科舉制度的緊密結合，使朱子《集注》和《四書》學得到迅速傳播和普及，衍生出了大量《四書》類文獻。與前代相比，通治《四書》成為潮流，將《四書》視作一個有機整體的理念在元儒《四書》著述中得到充分體現。元儒並不完全讚同朱熹對《大學》的改動，對朱子《集注》定本也有不同意見，同時在《四書》學中展現了“和會朱陸”的趨勢。 縱觀元代《四書》學著述，大多尊朱子《集注》為宗，著書立說為之增益補闕，視朱子《集注》“渾然猶經”成為元代《四書》學最鮮明的時代特徵。元代《四書》學作為宋學餘緒，受宋代《四書》學的影響較大，一方面繼承了宋代疑經、求真尚實的扎實學風，可見元儒於經術的用功與尊奉朱子的摯誠，但尊朱不等於盲從，元儒又敢於指出和糾正朱子《集注》的錯漏和不足之處，表現出了很強的求實精神；另一方面，元儒注重繼承前人研究成果，博采眾家之長，陳陳相因，據舊籍而不斷推陳出新，編撰了大量形式和內容各異的《四書》類著述，促進了《四書》學的傳播與普及。 下編五章，是整個論文的研究基礎，對現存33部元代《四書》著述進行考辨研究。按照思想內容與特點，將元代《四書》著述劃分為以朱詁朱之屬、偏重發明朱子《集注》義理之屬、偏重補充朱子《集注》訓詁考證之屬、小學舉業之屬、與朱子《集注》立異之屬等五類，對每部著作的著者生平、學術傳承、歷代著錄、版本源流、體例內容、詮釋特色及評價等進行逐一考論，多角度揭示其自身的特殊價值。特別是通過廣泛搜集元代《四書》文獻版本，運用目錄、版本、校勘等文獻研究方法，翔實考察了每部著作的著錄情況、版本形制、刊刻時地、流傳以及版本間的相互關係和異同等，指出具體版本的優劣，並隨文附上重要版本的書影，力求圖文並茂。同時，在繼承前人整理著錄的基礎上，對各類史志、目錄文獻中收錄的元代《四書》文獻著述進行考辨，去偽存真，糾正了前人著錄訛誤，編成《元代四書類著述簡目》，客觀反映了元代《四書》學者和著述的數量。 總之，本文從元代研治“四書”的典籍文獻入手，囊括了幾乎全部現存元人《四書》著述，著力於對文獻的系統梳理和考證，目的是揭示元代《四書》文獻的整體面貌和多元價值，為繼續開展《四書》文獻的系統整理和深入研究打下基礎，促進《四書》文本內容和思想理論的研究，不僅為《四書》學史、經學史、理學史、思想史，也為書籍史、社會史和教育史的研究提供豐富鮮活的第一手材料。

The Yuan Dynasty was an important period for the formation and development of the "Four Books" study. The "Four Books" in the Yuan Dynasty were academically inherited from the Song Dynasty, and gets down opens Ming and Qing Dynasty. They had an obvious role of inheriting and reviving the past. Due to the particularity of society and politics in the Yuan Dynasty, the academic circles have always paid relatively little attention to the study of the classics of the Yuan Dynasty, and the disclosure and research of the “Four Books” in the Yuan Dynasty, especially literature of the “Four Books”, is even weaker and needs to be further improved and deepened. The research scope of this article is roughly defined from 1276 to 1368, about 90 years (the upper limit of the Northern Jin Dynasty ruling area is 1234). It focuses on revealing and studying the Confucianists' interpretations of the “Four Books” category, mainly using the methods of literature and study history, the whole study and the case study, to reveal the Yuan Dynasty's "four books". The overall features and individual characteristics of the literature are systematically reviewed and studied in the four books of the Yuan Dynasty, especially the existing literature. The first four chapter is about the prosperity and social background of the literature of the Yuan Dynasty, the compilation and dissemination of the literature of the Yuan Dynasty, and the focus of the literature on the Yuan Dynasty's “Four Books” and summarized the characteristics and historical value of the Yuan Dynasty's “Four Books” and the literature. In the Yuan Dynasty, “Zhu Zi Xue” has been further developed, especially in the field of the "Four Books," which has almost become a study of Zhu Xi's "Four Books". The name of the "Four Books" dates back to the Song Dynasty,but generally in the “Four Books” as the title of the book is in the Yuan Dynasty. The study of the “Four Books” came from “Er Cheng”（二程）, which was finally made up by Zhu Xi, realizing the institutionalization of the official school in the Yuan Dynasty. The "Four Books" was gradually moved towards the study of learning. The status of the "Four Books" has been greatly improved and even achieved. Keeping pace with the "Five Classics". The real prosperity of the "Four Books" is from the Yuan Dynasty. Under the combined effect of internal and external factors, especially through the close combination of the imperial examination system, the study of Zhu Xi's "Si Shu Zhang Ju Ji Zhu"(《四書章句集注》) and "Four Books" has been spread rapidly and popularized, and derived a large number of "Four Books" literature. Compared with the previous generation, Study togethe Four Books has become a trend. The concept of "Four Books" as an organic whole has been fully reflected in the writings of Yuan Confucian's "Four Books". The yuan Confucianism did not fully agree with Zhu Xi's changes to the "Da Xue"（《大學》）, and had different opinions on Zhu Xi's "Si Shu Zhang Ju Ji Zhu"(《四書章句集注》) and showed the trend of "Combing Zhu and Lu’s studies"（和會朱陸） in the study of "Four Books". In the study of the Yuan Dynasty, most of the works of "Four Books" were written, most of which respected Zhu Zi's as his cases, writing books to make up the gap, and seeing Zhu Xi's "Si Shu Ji Zhu" as classics was the most distinct characteristics of the Yuan Dynasty's "Four Books". The study of "Four Books" in the Yuan Dynasty, as the heritage of the Song Dynasty, was greatly influenced by the study of the “Four Books” of the Song Dynasty. On the one hand, he inherited the solid study style of doubting the Scriptures and seeking truth from facts in the Song Dynasty. It can be seen that Yuan Ru's work on the Scriptures and the worship of Zhu Zi. The piety is devout, but respecting Zhu does not mean blind obedience. Yuan Ru dared to point out and correct the mistakes and inadequacies of Zhu Zi's "Ji Zhu" and showed a strong spirit of seeking truth; On the other hand, Yuan Ru paid attention to the achievements of the predecessors' researches, homage to the length, follow an old routine, form new books based on the original books, He compiled a large number of “Four Books” books in various forms and contents, which promoted the dissemination and popularization of the “Four Books”. The next chapter consists of five chapters, which is the basis for the study of the entire thesis . It examines and studies the existing 33 books of the Four Generations of the Yuan Dynasty. According to the contents and characteristics of the thought, the writings of the “Four Books” of the Yuan Dynasty were divided into five categories: the genera of annotating Zhu Zi's "Ji Zhu" with Zhu Xi's statement, the genera of the invention of Zhu Xi's "Ji Zhu", the genera of the exegesis of Zhu Xi's "Ji Zhu", the genera of the primary school and imperial examination, the genera of the different from Zhu Xi's "Ji Zhu". Each author's life, academic inheritance, historical records, version source, style content, interpretation features, and evaluation are examined one by one, revealing their own special values from many angles. In particular, through the extensive collection of literature versions of the Yuan Dynasty "Four Books", using the methods of literature research, such as catalogues, versions, and collation, this paper carefully inspected the description of the books, the form of the edition, the time of publication, the circulation and the similarities and differences between the versions, and pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of the specific edition, and accompanying the important version of the book, strive to be illustrated. At the same time, on the basis of inheriting the records of predecessors, the texts of the “Four Books” of the Yuan Dynasty collected in various historical records and bibliographical documents were examined, and the falsehoods were preserved, and the errors of the predecessors' records were corrected, and the “Four Books of the Yuan Dynasty” was compiled. And statistics the number of scholars and writings of the Yuan Dynasty. In short, this article starting with the literature of the Yuan Dynasty, encompasses the works of the “Four Books” of the Yuan Dynasty, and includes almost all of the existing Yuanren’s “Four Books” writings, focusing on the systematic review and textual research of the literature, with the purpose of revealing the “Four Books” literature of the Yuan Dynasty. The overall outlook and multiple values lay the foundation for continuing the systemic collation and in-depth study of the “Four Books” literature, and promoting the study of the text content and ideological theories of the “Four Books”. Not only provides the first hand material for the study of the history of the “Four Books”, the history of Confucian classics, the history of science, the history of thought, but also the history of books, the social history and the history of education.