- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 “阅读圈”模式对高中生批判性思维影响的行动研究    

姓名:

 朱雪艳    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 中文    

学科代码:

 045108    

学科专业:

 学科教学(英语)    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 教育硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2020    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 教育学部    

研究方向:

 英语阅读中的批判性思维    

第一导师姓名:

 杨庆云    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学外国语言文学学院    

提交日期:

 2020-06-22    

答辩日期:

 2020-05-30    

外文题名:

 ACTION RESEARCH OF THE EFFECTS OF READING CIRCLES ON CRITICAL THINKING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS    

中文关键词:

 阅读圈 ; 高中生 ; 批判性思维 ; 行动研究    

外文关键词:

 Reading Circles ; Senior Students ; Critical Thinking ; Action Research    

中文摘要:

        伴随着信息化和经济全球化的快速发展,创新型人才成为社会发展的主动力。创新建立在批判基础上,培养学生的批判性思维成为了当下教育关注的一个热点。本研究采用行动研究探究“阅读圈”模式对高中生批判性思维的影响。行动研究共分为三个阶段:准备阶段、“阅读圈”实施阶段、数据整理阶段。在“阅读圈”实施阶段主要是对角色任务的训练,共进行三轮行动研究:第一轮行动研究采取集体单一角色的训练。目的是让学生熟悉各个角色任务及其要求,本轮行动研究中暂不组成阅读小组。第二轮行动研究采取多角色针对性训练。本轮中学生组成阅读小组,组内成员承担不同的角色任务,完成任务后进行组内交流,班内展示。在角色展示时,笔者对部分角色有侧重的详细点评和策略指导。对角色的针对性训练分为三个阶段:第一阶段侧重人物队长和情节大师;第二阶段侧重主题达人和词句顾问;第三阶段侧重讨论总监。通过对角色的针对性训练培养学生分析、推理、评价的技能。第三轮行动研究为多角色训练。本轮中担任相同角色任务的学生组成一个阅读小组进行交流,然后每组选一个代表在班级展示讨论成果,以深化学生的讨论,提高学生的分析、推理、评价技能。

        本研究采用定量与定性相结合的研究方法,收集和分析数据。批判性思维倾向调查问卷和“阅读圈”访谈的数据分析表明“阅读圈”模式对学生的批判性思维倾向有显著影响,学生的批判性思维倾向整体上由弱性变为中性,批判性思维倾向的开放性、自信心和求知欲三个维度有显著变化,尤其是自信心由弱性变为中性。批判性思维技能的调查问卷结果表明学生的批判性思维技能整体上有明显提高。阅读和写作测试的结果以及学生习作分析表明批判性思维技能的三个核心技能分析、推理、评价均有不同程度的提高,学生角色日志的分析和访谈结果也体现了学生批判性思维技能的变化。此外,访谈结果还表明角色任务以及小组讨论是促成学生批判性思维变化的关键因素。因此,“阅读圈”模式能够促进高中生的批判性思维的发展。本研究为今后的教师教学提供了一定的借鉴。

外文摘要:

With the rapid development of global economy, the creative talents will become the core of the society, who must possess critical thinking. Therefore, cultivating the ability of critical thinking has become the focus of current education. This action research,consisting of three stages,aims to find out what the influence of reading circles has on senior high students’critical thinking. Preparation,conduction and conclusion are the three stages. When reading circles is carried out in the second stage,the training of the roles is the focus,which will be conducted in three sections. In the first section, the whole class will finish the same role task at a time to have some knowledge about the role. In the second section, the students will work in groups and finish differnt role tasks. Meanwhile, the teacher will offer some guidence and strategies for some specific roles in different periods to cultivate students’critical thingking ability. In the last section, the students who take on the same role task will get together to have a deeper discussion, which is beneficial to improving their analysis, inference and evaluation.

The quantitative and qualitative methods will be adopted to collect and analyse data. According to the data from the questionair CCTDI and the interview, the model of reading circle makes a big difference in the students’critical thinking spirit on the whole. Besides, the demensions of curiosity, confidence and openess improve significantly, confidence in particular. According to the data from the questionair on critical thinking skills, the students’ sills are improved a lot generally. Moreover, the results of tests in reading and writing convey that the students’ ability in analysis, inference and evaluation is also improved seperately to some degree. According to the interview, the role sheets and group discussion are the key factors to the development of critical thinking. Therefore, it is concluded that reading circles can improve senior high students’ critical thinking, which will be a reference to other teachers.

参考文献总数:

 54    

馆藏号:

 硕045108/20035    

开放日期:

 2021-06-22    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式