集成电路（IC）布图设计专有权的法律规制在法学理论和司法实践中一直是一个疑难问题。目前主流观点认为我国虽有针对布图设计专有权保护的条例，但是，该《条例》并不足以涵摄布图设计专有权侵权纠纷当中的诸多新型问题，并且在司法实践上对于侵权关系认定界限模糊。我国法律对于布图设计侵权的鉴定标准和证明方法也没有相关的明确规定。笔者拟以此为研究点，通过文献资料研究和近10年的司法判例分析，探讨司法实践当中的问题和我国现有法律规定的不足和原因，最后，从法律规制的角度给出解决当下该课题在我国法律实践中所出现的问题的行之有效的方案。 在绪论部分，笔者在进行了翔实的文献综述的基础上，介绍了集成电路布图设计专有权法律规制的历史文化背景、社会经济背景和学术研究背景，总结了国内外的学术研究成果，并介绍了本研究的目标、研究方法、主要内容以及创新之处。 第二章主要针对集成电路及其专有权的内涵和外延进行阐述，并通过对比布图设计与发明创造、布图设计与作品之间的差异，总结布图设计所要求的法律保障模式的特殊性。 第三章和第四章主要考察域外和我国的集成电路布图设计的立法、学说理论和司法现状。第四章侧重分析国内的布图设计专有权保护的司法实践。结合近10年来典型的司法判例，剖析布图设计纠纷的主要类型和产生原因，总结司法实践当中的问题与困惑。 第五章、第六章和第七章致力于总结我国集成电路布图设计保护制度中存在的问题、分析问题产生的根源以及针对每个问题提出可实施的有效解决途径。笔者认为，我国的集成电路专有权法律规制方面，存在以下五个问题：（1）民事法定赔偿额度无标准；（2）行政机关限制私权利行使；（3）刑事后果畸轻；（4）国际制约问题；（5）立法技术滞后、效用偏低。针对以上问题，笔者在第六章深度剖析了问题缘由，并在第七章给出如下五点建议：（1）在《条例》中增加民事纠纷的处理认定细节；（2）适当限制行政部门的公权力；（3）增加刑事责任条款；（4）结合国情机制应对国际制约；（5）完善我国的立法体系。 在结论部分，笔者表明，我们应在客观汲取发达国家在布图设计专有权保护领域方面的立法经验，结合实际国情和实践经验，在适当的时期提升集成电路布图设计法律规制的层次，完善相关的法律体系。

The legal regulation of the exclusive right of integrated circuit (IC) layout design has always been a complicated issue in legal theory and judicial practice. At present, the mainstream view is that although there are regulations on the protection of exclusive rights of layout designs in China, the ‘Regulations’ are not enough to cover many new problems in the disputes over the exclusive right of layout-design, and infringement in judicial practice. The boundaries of relationship identification are vague. There is no relevant and explicit provision in China's laws on the identification standards and methods of proof of layout design infringement. The author intends to use this phenomenon as a research point, through literature research and analysis of judicial precedents in the past 10 years, to explore the problems in judicial practice and the shortcomings and reasons of the existing legal provisions in China. Finally, to solve the problems that arise in the legal practice of our country，the researcher tables effective proposals from the perspective of legal regulation. In the introduction part, based on the detailed literature review, the author introduces the historical and cultural background, socio-economic background and academic research background of the legal regulation of the exclusive right of integrated circuit layout design, and summarizes the academic research results at home and abroad. It also introduces the objectives, research methods, main contents and innovations of this research. The second chapter mainly expounds the connotation and extension of IC and its exclusive rights, and compares the differences between layout-design and invention creation, layout design and works, and summarizes the special legal protection mode required by layout design. The third chapter and the fourth chapter mainly examine the legislation, doctrine theory and judicial status of the layout-design of integrated circuits outside the country and China. The fourth chapter focuses on the judicial practice of protecting the exclusive rights of layout design in China. Combining the typical judicial precedents in the past 10 years, this paper analyzes the main types and causes of layout design disputes, and summarizes the breakthroughs and confusions of judicial practice in China. The fifth chapter, the sixth chapter and the seventh chapter are devoted to summarizing the problems existing in the protection system of China's integrated circuit layout-design, analyzing the root causes of the problems and proposing effective solutions for each problem. The author believes that there are five problems in the legal regulation of IC exclusive rights in China: (1) there is no standard for civil statutory compensation; (2) the administrative agency limits the exercise of private rights; (3) the criminal consequences are abnormal; (4) international constraints; (5)the legislative technology is lagging behind and the utility is low. In view of the above problems, the author deeply analyzes the cause of the problem in the sixth chapter, and gives the following five suggestions in Chapter 7: (1) adding details of the handling of civil disputes in the Regulations; (2) appropriately restricting the administrative department; (3) increase the criminal liability clause; (4) taking into consideration the national conditions to deal with international constraints; (5) improve the legislative system of our country. In the conclusion part, the author indicates that we should objectively draw on the legislative experience of developed countries in the field of layout-design exclusive rights protection, and combine the actual situation of China's political economy and society to promote the legal regulation of integrated circuit layout design in an appropriate period. Level and improve the relevant legal system.