弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫与多丽丝·莱辛作为生活时间相距半个世纪左右的、在女性主义领域占有重要地位的两个作家，她们的作品在探讨“女性写作”的文学长河中具有极大的“继承性”与“开创性”。两位的代表作《一间自己的房间》和《金色笔记》表现出内容和观点上的强相关性。最明显的一个表现是后者的主角名字安娜·伍尔夫，其姓氏取自于弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫。两部作品同样探讨了女性写作的系列话题。其中，“重建女性写作传统”和“摒弃女性写作评判”是极为突出的两个主题。由此，本文将比较两部作品对于上述两大要素的观点。通过文本细读，本论文在两大要素下分别探究了以下主题，即历史上女性写作传统的缺失、新一代女性作家的文学“失语”、女性写作传统的重建；女性作家作品评判中的偏见与霸权、对女性作家作品评判的摒弃。本文最终得出结论，虽然两部作品对于上述两大要素分别呈现了直接和间接的表达，以及清晰和隐晦的态度，甚至对部分困境的来源有着不同的看法，但在如何解决困境上给出了相似的路径，即鼓励每个女性从自身开始培养写作习惯、重建写作传统、摒弃外界评价。

Virginia Woolf and Doris Lessing, who lived about half a century apart and held important positions in the field of feminism, play inheriting and pioneering roles in the literary discussion of “female writing”. Their representative works A Room of One’s Own and The Golden Notebook demonstrate a strong correlation in content and viewpoints between each other. An obvious manifestation is the protagonist of the latter work, Anna Woolf, whose surname is taken from Virginia Woolf. Both works explore a series of themes related to female writing, and “reconstructing of female writing tradition” and “disregarding reception and evaluation of female writing” are two prominent elements. Therefore, this thesis will compare views of the two works on the two elements. Through close reading of the original text, this thesis explores the following themes under two main elements: the absent female writing tradition in the past, writing “aphasia” in the future generation, reconstruction of female writing tradition; monopoly in themes and moral values of evaluation toward female writing, disregard of the external evaluation. The thesis draws to the conclusion that, although the two works present direct and indirect expressions of the above two elements, as well as clear and implicit attitudes, and even different views on the sources of some of the dilemma, they provide similar solution to manage the difficulties, that is, encouraging each woman to start cultivating writing habits from themselves, reconstruct female writing traditions, and disregard external evaluations.