个体动作发展持续生命的始终，粗大动作在个体早期发展中占据着重要地位，在动作技能学习、认知发展、情绪发展以及社会行为等方面均具有十分重要的意义。协调能力在个体神经肌肉的调动过程中作用突出，能够很大程度地影响个体完成动作的质量。粗大动作及协调能力发展状况不佳，将会对幼儿的生活与学习带来极大困扰。 学前阶段是个体粗大动作发展与协调能力发展的关键时期，对该年龄阶段幼儿的粗大动作和协调能力进行综合动作能力的有效评估，能够使老师及家长更加清楚地了解孩子的生长发育问题，便于及时发现并采取积极措施，还能为幼儿教育工作者在制定适宜的身体教育活动时提供参考，提高幼儿群体的生活质量。因此，探讨幼儿的粗大动作和协调能力发展水平及其二者的相关关系是十分必要的。 本研究旨在提高家长及老师对幼儿粗大动作及协调能力发展水平的认知及重视程度，厘清幼儿的粗大动作和协调能力发展水平及其二者的联系，为后续研究及指导实践提供参考依据。本文研究对象为4-6岁幼儿的粗大动作与协调能力发展水平及其相关性。研究过程中共选取211名4-6岁幼儿作为实验对象，男童113名，女童98名。研究主要采用测试法、数理统计与分析得出以下结论： (1)幼儿的移动类粗大动作发展水平体现出了较为明显的年龄和性别差异。6岁组幼儿的移动类粗大动作得分水平更高；5岁组男童和6岁组女童的移动类粗大动作发展水平分别在同龄群体中占据优势。“跳跃类”动作在不同年龄群体中均表现出了较大差异。 (2)幼儿的操作类粗大动作发展水平也具有明显的年龄和性别差异。6岁组幼儿的操作类粗大动作得分水平更占优势；同龄男女童在不同的测试项目中分别体现出了不同的优势。 (3)幼儿的身体协调能力发展水平受年龄因素影响较为显著，年龄越大，身体协调能力发展水平越高。从同年龄组的性别角度来看，仅有5岁组男童在侧移动项目中得分水平显著高于同龄女童。 (4)6岁组幼儿的粗大动作整体发展水平和协调能力发展水平均较5岁组幼儿体现出明显的优势。在性别因素方面，5岁组男童在粗大动作总体得分方面显著优于同龄女童，6岁组男女童的粗大动作无显著差异。 (5)根据幼儿动作能力发展水平对其进行等级划分，绝大多数幼儿的动作能力发展水平均呈现出较好的发展状况，少数幼儿的动作能力发展水平呈现出较同龄人相对滞后的状况。 (6) 4-6岁幼儿的粗大动作发展水平与其身体协调能力发展水平存在着一定的线性关系，且关系密切。逐步回归分析显示，移动类粗大动作发展水平在一定程度上影响了幼儿身体协调能力的发展。

Individual’s motor development can last for the whole life. Gross motor plays an important role in the early development of individual. It plays an important role in motor skill learning, cognitive development, emotional development and social behavior. Coordination plays a prominent role in the process of individual’s neuromuscular mobilization, which can greatly affect the quality of individual’s action. The poor development of gross movement and coordination will bring great troubles to children's life and learning. Pre-school stage is the key period for the development of individual gross movement and coordination. Effective evaluation of children's gross movement and coordination in this age stage can help teachers and parents to understand children's growth and development more clearly and it is convenient for timely corrective treatment, besides it can also provide early childhood educators with appropriate physical education activities. For reference, improve the quality of life of young children. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the development level of children's gross movement and coordination and the correlation between them. [1] The development level of children's gross motor reflects the obvious age and gender differences. In the 6-year-old group, the mobile-type gross movements scored higher; the 5-year-old boys and the 6-year-old girls had dominant levels of mobile-like movements in the same age group. The “jumping class” movement showed a large difference in different age groups. [2] The development level of children's object control movement also has significant age and gender differences. In the 6-year-old group, the scoring level of the object control movement of children was more dominant; the boys and girls of the same age showed different advantages in different test items. [3] The development level of children's physical coordination ability is significantly affected by age factors. The older the age, the higher the level of physical coordination ability developed. From the gender perspective of the same age group, only the 5-year-old boys scored significantly higher in the side-moving items than girls of the same age. [4] The overall gross motor development level and coordination ability of the 6-year-old children's gross movements showed a clear advantage over the 5-year-old children. In terms of gender factors, the 5-year-old boys were significantly better than the girls of the same age in the overall score of the gross movement, and the gross motor of the boys and girls in the 6-year-old group had no significant differences. [5] According to the development level of children's motor competence, the development of most children's movement competence shows a good development status, and the development level of a few children's movement competence is relatively lagging behind their peers. [6] The development level of the gross motor of 4-6 years old children has a certain linear relationship with the development level of physical coordination ability, and it is closely related. Stepwise regression analysis shows that the results of mobile large-scale action scores affect the development of children's physical coordination ability at a certain level.