不同主权国家的法律和司法系统存在差异，在追逃追赃等方面就需要沟通配合，国际刑事司法合作就显得尤为重要，因此各国需要加强引渡合作。引渡条约是引渡工作顺利开展的重要条件，引渡条约对于条约前置主义国家来说更是必不可少的条件之一。英国与近一百个国家签订过引渡条约，相比之下，已经与我国签订引渡条约的国家微乎其微。2003年英国通过修改引渡法，增加了引渡特别安排，打破了英国长期奉行的条约前置主义，拓宽了引渡合作对象，让那些不属于欧盟国家也未曾与英国签订引渡条约的国家，可以与英国达成引渡合作。我国外逃罪犯尤其是追逃追赃涉及的经济类罪犯逃往的国家，多为没有与我国签订引渡条约的国家，然而我国现有的引渡法中没有法条明确规定如何处理与我国没有签订引渡条约的国家或地区进行引渡合作的相关事项，条约前置主义是我国引渡合作中面临的重大难题，英国引渡特别安排这种做法为我国完善引渡法提供了新思路。长期以来对引渡问题的看法是：英美法系与大陆法系差异巨大，进行涉及引渡方面的法律移植存在很大阻力；我国引渡法起步晚，立法技术还不够完善，借鉴英美先进的引渡制度并不能与我国司法环境相适应。但是，从《刑法修正案（九）》死刑罪名的减少到去年我国《宪法》的修改，都反映出我国法律法规逐步完善的趋势，惩治犯罪维护社会稳定、保障人权促进法治公正的法治理念不断深入，中国在处理台湾地区、港澳特别行政区问题上因地制宜的差别对待，使我国借鉴英国特别引渡安排具有必要性和可行性。另外，我国在与外国进行引渡时，除了引渡成功率低，还面临耗时长等问题。在完善引渡制度，促进与国际引渡标准接轨的同时，还应该积极寻找引渡替代措施来弥补正式引渡的不足。 本文除了引言外，共分为五个部分： 第一部分为英国引渡特别安排的法律根基。英国引渡特别安排，是英国与既非第一类法域国家或地区（主要指欧盟国家）又非第二类法域国家或地区（与英国有引渡条约的国家），就具体案例达成的个案协定。英国引渡特别安排在扩宽英国引渡合作对象方面，发挥重要的积极作用。 第二部分为英国引渡特别安排的司法实践。主要通过两个案例分析英国引渡特别安排的具体适用，以及分析通过引渡特别安排达成引渡合作成功或失败的原因。主要包括请求国主权地位是否合法；请求国司法是否公正，能否保障基本人权；请求国提供的证据是否符合标准。 第三部分为我国借鉴英国引渡特别安排的必要性分析。我国外逃犯罪人员数量庞大，且大多逃往英美法系等未与我国签订引渡条约的国家，因此，借鉴英国引渡特别安排的相关规定非常必要。 第四部分为我国借鉴英国引渡特别安排的可行性分析。从主观方面来说，我国特殊的国情，以及我国追究司法公正的法治理念为我国借鉴提供条件，从客观方面来说，国际合作加强的大环境，也给我借鉴带来便利。 第五部分为对于完善我国引渡制度的建议。除了完善国内引渡法等相关法律外，还可以积极拓展引渡替代措施，多管齐下追逃追赃，将罪犯绳之於法。

Due to the differences in laws and judicial systems of different sovereign states, it is necessary to communicate and cooperate in the pursuit of fugitives and recovered assets. International criminal justice cooperation is quite necessary, especially in the case of extradition. Extradition treaty is an important condition for the smooth development of extradition work. Britain has also signed extradition treaties with nearly 100 countries, compared with only a handful that have done so with China. In 2003, the UK amended the extradition law, added special arrangements for extradition, broke the long-standing "treaty preposition" of the UK, broadened the scope of extradition cooperation, and made it possible for countries that do not belong to the European Union and have not signed extradition treaties with the UK to reach extradition cooperation with the UK. Our flight pursuit recover stolen money or goods especially economic crimes involving countries, is no more an extradition treaty with our country, however our country existing extradition laws about no sign extradition treaty with China country extradition cooperation processing method is not clear, "treaty front-facing doctrine", the major problem facing extradition cooperation in China, Britain extradition arrangements such as provides a new way of thinking for perfecting the extradition laws in our country. For a long time, it has been formed that there is a big difference between the common law system and the civil law system, and there is a big resistance to the legal transplant of extradition. China's extradition law started late, and there are problems in legislation technology. Drawing lessons from the "advanced" extradition system of Britain and the United States can not adapt to China's judicial environment. But, in the "criminal law amendment nine of the death penalty charges reduced to last modification of the constitution in our country, all reflect the trend of perfecting laws and regulations in our country, the crime to maintain social stability, protecting human rights, promote the rule of law and fair concept of rule of law, China in dealing with Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao special administrative region shall, on the issue of the difference of adjust measures to local conditions, make our country draw lessons from the British special extradition arrangements has necessity and feasibility. In addition, when conducting extradition with foreign countries, China is faced with the problem of long time consuming besides the low success rate of extradition. While reflecting on the perfection of China's extradition system and promoting the convergence with international extradition standards, we should also actively seek alternative measures to make up for the deficiency of formal extradition. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts: The first part is the legal basis of the UK special extradition arrangement. The UK's special extradition arrangement is a case-by-case agreement between the UK and countries that are neither in the first category (mainly eu countries) nor in the second category (countries with extradition treaties with the UK) on specific cases. The UK special extradition arrangements play an important and positive role in broadening the scope of UK extradition partners. The second part is the judicial practice of British special extradition arrangement. This paper mainly analyzes the specific application of the UK special extradition arrangement through two cases and the reasons for the success or failure of extradition cooperation through the special extradition arrangement. The third part is the feasibility analysis of the special arrangement for extradition. Subjectively, China's special national conditions and the rule of law concept of pursuing judicial justice provide conditions for China to learn from. Objectively, the environment of strengthening international cooperation also brings convenience for China to learn from. The fourth part is the analysis of the necessity of the special extradition arrangement. China has a large number of fugitive criminals, and most of them have fled to countries that have not signed extradition treaties with China, such as the Anglo-American law system. Therefore, it is necessary to learn from the relevant provisions of the special extradition arrangement of Britain. The fifth part is the suggestion to perfect our country extradition system. In addition to improving the domestic extradition law and other relevant laws, we can also actively expand the alternative measures of extradition, and pursue fugitives and recovered stolen assets in multiple ways to bring criminals to justice.