毒品犯罪形势愈演愈烈，控制下交付的手段随之出现。2012年《刑事诉讼法》明确规定了控制下交付这一措施，使其具有了合法性地位和法律依据，对这一措施的应用具有历史性意义。但控制下交付的法律规定过于原则和抽象，需要进行进一步完善。本文通过总结我国毒品犯罪控制下交付规定的不足，考察、借鉴域外国家和地区的有关规定，提出了若干关于完善毒品犯罪控制下交付的规定的构想。在第一章介绍了毒品犯罪控制下交付的概念及其与诱惑侦查的区别，为后续论述的展开打下基础；第二章是对我国毒品犯罪控制下交付手段的现状的审思，包括立法规定与司法运行，并从中发现问题；第三章是对国际公约、域外国家和地区的有关规定进行介绍，考察严格控制模式、裁量控制模式、禁止模式三种模式。第四章是针对控制下交付这一手段在立法和司法中出现的问题，从立法规定和司法实践两方面提出的若干建议。

The situation of drug crime has intensified, and the means of delivery have emerged. In 2012, the criminal procedure law clearly defined the delivery of this measure under the control, so that it has the legal status and legal basis, and it is of historic significance for the application of this measure. But the law of delivery under control is too principled and abstract and needs to be further improved. By summarizing the shortcomings of the delivery regulations under the control of drug crimes in China, this paper proposes some ideas on improving the delivery of drug crime control by referring to the relevant provisions of countries and regions outside the region. In the first chapter, the concept of delivery under the control of drug crime and its differences with the temptation investigation are introduced, which lays a foundation for the subsequent elaboration. The second chapter is a review of the current situation of the delivery means under the control of drug crime in China, including the legislative provisions and judicial operation, and the problems are found out. The third chapter introduces the relevant provisions of international conventions, foreign countries and regions, and examines the three modes of strict control mode, discretion control mode and prohibition mode. The fourth chapter is about the problems in legislation and judicature under the control of the delivery of this method, and some suggestions from the legislative and judicial practice.