随着大数据、云计算、区块链、人工智能的迭代发展，科技革命的成果为经济赋能增效，促进社会经济实现高质量发展，数字经济时代已然到来。在享受经济发展红利的同时，伴随而来的是各种新类型经济纠纷。与传统经济纠纷不同，新质生产力发展引起的新类型经济纠纷具备数字化、虚拟化、复杂化等特点，对现有司法审判提出了更高要求，涉及司法审判的数字化、及时性、针对性优化，目前亟待建立有一套专业、系统的数字经济纠纷司法审判工作机制。目前，以互联网法院、互联网法庭为代表的司法机构正围绕涉网案件的审理展开积极探索，试图完善涉网案件审判规则、维护网络秩序。然而，数字经济纠纷案件的类型范围应当如何界定？可否设立审判专门机构取代互联网法院解决数字经济纠纷？该审判专门机构应当如何定性？如何对审判程序和审理制度进行优化升级才能使该专门机构与数字经济纠纷特点相贴合？为更好地应对数字经济纠纷案件，需要对上述问题进行解答。
文章立足于互联网法院（庭）的实践成果，对数字经济纠纷的司法审判专门化建设展开探讨，具体表现为审判组织专门化、审判程序专门化、审判团队专门化、管辖规则专门化等方面，以提高数字经济纠纷案件审判质量和效率。数字经济纠纷司法审判专门化建设主要面临创新、推广与成长的问题，在数字经济快速发展的时代，我国需要通过改革试点、优化升级等方式探索适应时代发展的司法审判机制，积累司法实践经验，建立更为科学、专门、现代的专门化审判制度，能动且高效地解决纠纷。

文章着眼于数字经济纠纷的特质性，对数字经济纠纷进行范围界定，通过列举式归纳数字经济纠纷的案件类型，结合司法专门化的要求和标准，探讨数字经济纠纷司法审判专门化建设的可行性、必要性及价值依归。同时文章将围绕数字经济纠纷的司法工作现状进行检视，结合互联网法院庭）的司法实践反思现有的数字经济纠纷审理中存在的、在专门化司法审判体系构建过程中需要重点关注的法院设置不规范、管辖范围有争议、审判人员实践经验不足、组织体系待完善等问题，探索其背后的深层次成因。对此，文章结合我国专门法院设置理念、设置标准以及设置关键点，从司法建制构建和法律规范完善两方面提出专门化建设思路，针对数字经济案件的司法现状，对数字经济纠纷司法审判专门化的推进路径进行系统构想。从法律规范层面明确数字经济纠纷专门法院设立依据、完善设置标准，推动数字经济纠纷案件管辖制度改革，加强专门化审判机构和审判队伍建设，对审级制度和专门化审判程序进行优化调整，以全面推进司法审判专门化建设，以期为我国深化司法体制改革、妥善应对新类型纠纷、促进专门法院理论建设添砖加瓦。

With the iterative development of big data, cloud computing, blockchain, and artificial intelligence, the fruits of the scientific and technological revolution have empowered and increased the efficiency of the economy, promoting the realization of high-quality development of the social economy, and the era of the digital economy has arrived. While enjoying the dividends of economic development, accompanied by a variety of new types of economic disputes. Unlike traditional dispute types, new types of economic disputes under the influence of the development of new quality productivity with digital, virtual, complexity and other characteristics of the existing judicial trial system optimization puts forward a higher demand for judicial trial work digital, timely, targeted standards more rigorous than the traditional cases and precise, urgently need to set up a set of specialized, systematic judicial trial work mechanism. At present, the Internet Court, Internet court as the representative of the judicial institutions are around the trial of Internet-related cases to actively explore, trying to build trial rules, maintain network order. However, can digital economy disputes be summed up by Internet-related cases alone? How should the scope of types of digital economy dispute cases be defined? Is it possible to set up a specialized adjudication body to replace the Internet Court in resolving digital economy disputes? How should such a specialized adjudication body be characterized? How to optimize and upgrade the trial procedures and trial system in order to make the specialized institution fit the characteristics of digital economy disputes? The systematic response to digital economy dispute cases needs to answer and respond to the above questions.
Based on the practical achievements of the Internet court (court), this paper discusses the construction of judicial trial specialization of digital economic disputes, which is specifically manifested in the aspects of specialization of trial organization, specialization of trial procedure, specialization of trial team, specialization of jurisdictional rules and so on, in order to improve the quality and efficiency of trial of digital economic dispute cases. The specialized construction of digital economic dispute trial mainly faces the problems of innovation, promotion and growth. In the era of rapid development of digital economy, China needs to explore the judicial trial mechanism adapted to the development of the times through reforming and piloting, optimizing and upgrading, and accumulating the judicial practice experience, to set up a more scientific, specialized, and modern specialized trial system, and to solve the disputes in a dynamic and efficient way.
This paper focuses on the specificity of digital economic disputes, defines the scope of digital economic disputes, summarizes the types of digital economic disputes through enumeration, and discusses the feasibility, necessity and value of the construction of judicial specialization of digital economic disputes in conjunction with the requirements and standards of judicial specialization. At the same time, this paper will review the current situation of the judicial work of digital economic disputes, reflect on the existing digital economic disputes, reflect on the existing judicial practice of the Internet Court (court), and focus on the construction of a specialized judicial trial system in the process of the court set up irregularities, disputes over the scope of jurisdiction, lack of experience of the judiciary, and the organizational system to be perfected, to explore the deep-rooted causes behind it. In this regard, this paper combines the concept of setting up special courts in China, setting up standards and setting up key points, and puts forward the idea of specialized construction from the construction of judicial system and the improvement of legal norms, and makes a systematic conception of the promotion path of the specialization of the judicial trial of digital economic disputes according to the judicial status quo of the digital economic cases. From the level of legal norms, it improves the basis for the establishment of specialized courts and the standards for setting up specialized courts, promotes the reform of the jurisdiction system for digital economic disputes, strengthens the construction of specialized trial institutions and trial teams, and optimises and adjusts the trial level system and specialized trial procedures, so as to comprehensively push forward the construction of specialized judicial trials. The establishment of a systematic and perfect specialized judicial system for digital economy disputes can add bricks and mortar to the deepening of China's judicial system reform, appropriately responding to new types of disputes, and promoting the theoretical construction of specialized courts.