在现代化与城市化进程的快速推进下，城市混合型社区作为一种空间变迁与重组的特殊社区类型构成了中国基层治理所面临的重要情境。政府和市场主导下的行政区划分隔和空间重组浪潮使得原有的聚居形态和空间秩序被重塑，生产生活方式、社会阶层、职业类型等迥然不同的群体被统合于同一社区，并在社区内部分化出异质性强、边界鲜明的多重社会空间。因此，城市混合型社区追求善治的治理实践构成了研究的主要议题。沿着城市社会学有关混合型社区研究的经典脉络，基于空间社会学与区位视角，研究从中国城市社区“多样性”的表现出发，探讨基层社区如何在公共意识、社会资本、社区精神等维度跨越内部边界，从“混合”的现实走向“善治”的未来。

北京市金融街片区是一个充满着“割裂”和“对撞”的区域。权力主导的改革、经济转型的规划在传统“老北京”中开辟了一片属于金融产业的“新城”，属于建国前的四合院、属于计划经济时代的单位制小区和属于当下的金融街等同时叠加于同一街区。研究选取该片区内的M社区作为个案研究对象，考察其内部边界的起源、多重空间的特征与追求善治的实践。研究发现，M社区内部形成了相互独立的金融空间、胡同空间与旧楼空间，在治理中既要将其吸纳进入社区治理的统合秩序，又要充分激发不同空间内居民参与基层自治的主体性。在对公共意识、社会资本、社区精神的调动中，M社区探索形成了“善治=整合+激活”的混合治理路径，包括以项目运作与属地吸纳为代表的核心治权统筹、以金融赋能与平台搭建为代表的多元资源嵌入、以党建引领和文化协同为代表的社区精神联结。

研究认为，混合社区内部边界的本质为纵向的时代变革截面与横向的阶层分化截面之叠加，中国城市社区治理的关键问题正是整体性治理。M社区在党建引领下通过核心治权统筹推动了多重社会空间的整合，通过多元资源嵌入实现了治理主体性的激活，通过社区精神联结实现了迈向“善治”的粘合。这一治理思路展现了城市中心区以老旧小区为主的混合型社区构建治理共同体的尝试，构成了对中国式城市混合型社区善治之道的有益探索。

Rapid modernization and urbanization have led to the emergence of urban mixed-use communities as a unique type of spatial transition and reorganization, presenting significant challenges for grassroots governance in China. The waves of administrative division and spatial reconfiguration led by the government and market have reshaped traditional settlement patterns and spatial orders, integrating disparate groups characterized by different lifestyles, social classes, and occupations into the same community, and differentiating within the community multiple social spaces with strong heterogeneity and distinct boundaries. Therefore, the governance practice of pursuing good governance in urban mixed-use communities has become a primary focus of this study. Following the classic sociological trajectory of mixed-use community research and based on a spatial sociological and local perspective, this study explores how grassroots communities transcend internal boundaries in terms of public consciousness, social capital, and community spirit, moving from a reality of "mixing" to a future of "good governance."

The Financial Street area in Beijing is a region rife with "fractures" and "colli

-sions." Reforms led by power and economic transformation plans have carved out a "new city" for the financial industry within the traditional "Old Beijing," where traditional Chinese courtyard houses built before the founding of the People's Republic of China, work unit compounds from the planned economy era, and the contemporary Financial Street all coexist within the same neighborhood. The study selects the M Community within this area as a case study to examine the origins of its internal boundaries, the characteristics of its multiple spaces, and its practices in pursuing good governance. The study finds that within M Community, distinct financial spaces, “hutong” spaces, and old building spaces have formed, requiring governance that both incorporates them into a unified community order and fully activates the agency of residents in different spaces for grassroots autonomy. In the mobilization of public consciousness, social capital, and community spirit, M Community has explored a mixed governance path of "good governance = integration + activation," including core governance rights coordination represented by project operations and territorial absorption, diverse resource embedding represented by financial empowerment and platform building, and community spirit connection represented by party leadership and cultural collaboration.

The study suggests that the essence of internal boundaries in mixed communities is the superposition of longitudinal sections of epochal change and horizontal sections of class differentiation, and that the key issue of urban community governance in China is holistic governance. Under the leadership of the CPC, M Community has promoted the integration of multiple social spaces through core governance rights coordination, activated governance subjectivity through diverse resource embedding, and achieved the cohesion towards "good governance" through community spirit connection. The governance ideas and integrated mechanisms explored by M Community hold the potential to be adapted through regional cultural and practical modifications into experiences and models that can be drawn upon and emulated by more mixed-use urban communities.