随着我国市场经济的飞速发展，民事诉讼领域中的虚假诉讼现象层出不穷。虚假诉讼案件的增加不仅损害第三人利益，也扰乱了诉讼秩序，严重损害司法权威。只有加强对虚假诉讼行为的规制，才有助于平衡诉权保障与诚信原则之间的关系，避免紧张的司法资源遭到不当的或恶意的利用，以背离制度设计的初衷。因虚假诉讼现象呈上升态势，为解决民事诉讼中存在的虚假诉讼问题，2013年以来，最高人民法院先后下发了《关于房地产调控政策下人民法院严格审查各类虚假诉讼的紧急通知》、《最高人民法院关于清查“以房抵债”等虚假诉讼案件的意见》和《最高人民法院关于防范和制裁虚假诉讼的指导意见》。可以看出，近年来国家对民事虚假诉讼问题给予了极大重视，学界关于虚假民事诉讼也讨论热烈，从不同的视角以不同的方法进行研究，呈现出细节化和多层次的特点。全文除引言、结语外，共分为三个章节进行论述，主要内容如下：

第一章为民事虚假诉讼的概说。笔者通过比较不同学者的观点，列举裁判文书网的生效判决案例，主要分析民事虚假诉讼的概念界定及虚假诉讼与恶意诉讼、诉讼欺诈、滥用诉权等相关概念的比较，对虚假诉讼包括多发于财产类案件、当事人之间恶意串通、诉讼对抗弱化性、多以调解程序结案、识别滞后且不易查处等典型特征进行剖析，在对民事虚假诉讼的概念、特征界定后，还着重分析了包括民事虚假诉讼行为的社会成因和制度成因，其中对虚假诉讼行为所产生的危害也做了浓墨重彩的论述；

第二章为现阶段我国法律规制民事虚假诉讼的现状与问题。结合立法规制层面、司法规制层面的现有状态，探讨民事虚假诉讼在立法、司法规制中存在的问题。笔者希望透过这些现存的主要问题，为规制民事虚假诉讼行为提出相应的合理化建议；

第三章为规制民事虚假诉讼行为的完善建议。笔者依旧从立法、司法两个层面提出完善民事诉讼证据制度、民事诉讼调解制度、对虚假诉讼受害人权利保护制度、加大虚假诉讼制裁力度的相应四方面建议，以期规制和预防虚假诉讼案件的发生。

总之，虽然民事虚假诉讼的界定问题在学界存在着不同观点，但是随着立法实践的不断发展，在相关概念界定方面已经存在普遍的共识，还存在从民事虚假诉讼的特征、类型、成因等角度进行的分析。因此，本文认为如要重视民事虚假诉讼问题的规制问题，需要从对虚假诉讼概念的界定入手，深入探讨其行为的成因、立法、司法层面规制的现状，形成有针对性的措施，找到其以后的发展方向。

With the rapid development of the market economy, false litigation in the field of civil litigation is emerging. The increase in false litigation cases not only harms the interests of third parties, but also disrupts the litigation order and seriously damages judicial authority. Only strengthening the regulation of false litigation can help to balance the relationship between the guarantee of litigation rights and the principle of good faith, avoiding the improper or malicious use of tense judicial resources and deviating from the original intention of the system design. Due to the rising trend of false litigation, in order to solve the problem of false litigation in civil litigation, since 2013, the Supreme People's Court has issued the "Emergency Notice on the People's Courts Strictly Examining Various False Litigations under the Real Estate Regulation Policy" and " Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Investigating False Litigation Cases such as "Debt Repayment by House". On June 20, 2016, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Guiding Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Preventing and Sanctioning False Litigation". It can be seen that in recent years, the country has paid great attention to the issue of civil false litigation. The academic community also has rich discussions on false civil litigation. From different perspectives, it has conducted research with different research methods, showing details and multi-level characteristics. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three chapters for discussion. The main contents are as follows

Chapter One is an overview of civil false litigation. By comparing the views of different scholars, the author lists the effective judgment cases of the Judgment Document Network. It mainly analyzes the definition of civil false litigation, comparison with malicious litigation, litigation fraud, abuse of litigation rights and other related concepts. Analysis of typical characteristics such as malicious collusion between the parties and the weakening of litigation confrontation, settlement of cases through mediation procedures, identification delay and difficulty in investigation, etc. After the concept and characteristics of civil false litigation are defined, the analysis includes civil false litigation The social causes and institutional causes of the case, which also made a strong argument about the harm caused by false lawsuits;

The second chapter is the current situation and problems of China's legal regulation of civil false litigation. Combining with the existing status at the level of legislation and judicial regulation, this paper discusses the problems of civil false litigation in legislation and judicial regulation. The author hopes to use these existing major issues to provide corresponding rationalization suggestions for regulating civil false litigation;

The third chapter is to improve the regulation of civil false litigation. The author still puts forward four corresponding suggestions from the legislative and judicial levels to improve the civil litigation evidence system, civil litigation mediation system, the rights protection system for the victims of false litigation, and increase the sanctions for false litigation, with a view to regulating and preventing false litigation cases.

In short, although there are different views on the definition of civil false litigation in the academic world, with the continuous development of legislative practice, there has been a general consensus on the definition of related concepts, and there are also perspectives on the characteristics, types and causes of civil false litigation Conducted analysis. Therefore, this article believes that if we need to pay attention to the regulation of civil false litigation, we need to start with the definition of false litigation, in-depth discussion of the causes of its behavior, the status of legislation, judicial level of regulation, and form targeted measures to find the future Development direction.