《粤港澳发展规划纲要》从经济发展、社会管理、文化建设、科技创新、制度创 新等全方位部署，目的是打造世界级一流湾区。世界级一流湾区的发展需要一流的生 产要素流通体系、信息技术共享体系、法律制度保障体系等。其中法律保障体系是前 提和基础。然而，粤港澳地区面临着 “一个国家、二种制度、三个法域”的障碍，这 种障碍导致三地之间的资本、人员、技术等生产要素流通不畅，各地区联动发展受阻。 法律作为社会“调控器”必须为此做出回应。仲裁制度作为法律制度之一，有其优越性。

仲裁国际化程度高，可以满足当事人对规则、程序的特殊需要，同时，仲裁裁决 可以依据联合国承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约（《纽约公约》）在全球 169 个国家执 行。所以加强粤港澳仲裁合作相对于其他法律制度的合作难度更小，效率更高。广东 省、香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政在仲裁合作领域做出了多方面的探索，包括商事 仲裁跨区域司法协助的完善、仲裁平台跨区域的协作。这些探索也为未来进一步的发 展融合提供了宝贵的经验，同时也有很多不足之处。本文将梳理过往合作的内容与方 式，着重分析合作方式的优势和不足，以便未来达到更深层次的融合。

本文第一部分主要研究的是粤港澳大湾区仲裁融合的基础，从国家战略、区域政 策层面分析粤港澳仲裁融合的政治基础，同时结合粤港澳仲裁融合的特点和存在的问 题。主要目的是后续的粤港澳大湾区仲裁融合路径选择提供方向和指引。

本文第二部分主要研究的是广东省、香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政仲裁制度的 相同点和不同点，其中相同点是合作的基础，不同点是仲裁融合路径选择需要克服的 对象。

本文第三部分研究的是搭建仲裁合作平台这种路径在粤港澳仲裁合作的具体应用，具体分析深圳国际仲裁院、南沙国际仲裁中心、粤港澳大湾区仲裁联盟的创新发 展模式及审理方式。

The "Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area" is a comprehensive deployment from various aspects such as economic development, social management, cultural construction, scientific and technological innovation, and institutional innovation, with the aim of building a world-class bay area. The development of a world-class bay area requires a first-class circulation system of production factors, information sharing system of technology, and legal system mguarantee, among which the legal protection system is a prerequisite and foundation. However, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao region is faced with the obstacle of "one country, two systems, and three legal jurisdictions", which leads to poor circulation of production factors such as capital, personnel, and technology among the three regions, and the coordinated development of each region is hindered. As a societal "regulator", the law must respond to this. As one of the legal systems, the arbitration system has its advantages.

The internationalization degree of arbitration is high, and it can meet the special needs of parties for rules and procedures. At the same time, arbitration awards can be enforced in 169 countries worldwide under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("New York Convention"). Therefore, strengthening the arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao area is easier and more efficient than other legal systems' cooperation. Guangdong Province, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and the Macao Special Administrative Region have made various explorations in the field of arbitration cooperation, including the improvement of cross-regional judicial assistance for commercial arbitration and the cooperation of arbitration platforms across regions. These explorations also provide valuable experience for future further development and integration, while there are also many

shortcomings. This article will sort out the content and methods of past cooperation, and focus on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the cooperation method, in order to achieve deeper cooperation in the future.

The first part of this article mainly studied the foundation of arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, analyzed the political foundation of arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao area from the national strategy and regional policy level, and proposed several cooperation path choices based on the characteristics and problems of arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao area. The main purpose is to provide direction and guidance for the follow-up path choice of arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.

The second part of this article mainly studied the similarities and differences of the arbitration systems in Guangdong Province, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and Macao Special Administrative Region, of which the similarities are the foundation of cooperation, and the differences are the objects that need to overcome in the choice of arbitration cooperation path.

The third part of this article studied the specific application of the path of building an arbitration cooperation platform in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao area, and specifically analyzed the innovative development mode and trial methods of the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court, Nansha International Arbitration Center, and Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Arbitration Alliance.

The fourth part of this article mainly analyzed the path choices of arbitration cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao area, and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of several paths based on the current situation of arbitration development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.