本文是对甘肃省南部一个茶叶专业化山村的村社两级治理状况的个案研究，补充了村庄治理中对村社治理结构以及村社干部行动策略的研究。文章基于杜赞奇（Prasenjit Duara）的国家权力和权力的文化网络对经纪行为影响的分析范式，以及戴慕贞(Jean C. Oi)对乡镇与村干部间、村干部与农民间双重“庇护关系”的讨论，得出本研究的理论框架，以典型事件分析的方式，重点考察税费改革后，在村社治理结构中，村干部、社长及农民三者之间的关系，影响村干部和社长的治理行为的因素，以及他们治理的策略和手段。研究者认为，尽管政府对农村社会从“汲取”到“服务”的转向，政府依赖村干部对村庄治理的情况没有改变，政府与村干部之间，村干部与社长之间、村社干部与农民都存在庇护关系。任免制度和利益分配机制与维系村社治理结构有密切联系，村干部与社长利益共谋。利益竞争和对权威的依附使村庄权力的文化网络难以形成对村庄权力精英的制约。村干部与社长奉行“简约主义”和发挥“摆平技术”达到治理目标并实现自身的利益。

Including research on rural administration structure as well as action strategy and means of cares of both village and village group level, this paper is a case study on two-level governance in village level and village group village level respectively in a mountain village specialized in tea industry in Southern Gansu. The theoretical framework of this paper is based on the conformation both analyzing how the authority of government and its cultural network impact broker behaviors which raised by Prasenjit Duara and Jean C. Oi’s application of the dual patron-client township cadres and village cadres as well as those between village cadres and peasants. It employs several typical events to analyze three aspects post agricultural tax exemption, namely, the relationship among village cadres, village group cadres and peasants under the context of rural governance structure, factors impacting governance behaviors of both village cadres and village group cadres, and their governance strategy and means. Although identifying the government’s policy direction to rural society has been changed from drawing to service, this paper presents that government still rely on village cadres to manage rural areas. Furthermore, the sanctuary relationship is widely existed between government and village cadres, between village cadres and village group cadres as well as between village group cadres and peasants. Appointment-removal mechanism together with benefit allocation mechanism have close interrelationship with governance levels of both village and village group. There are common interests between village cadres and village group cadres. Due to competition of interests and attaching cadres, culture nexus of power could not restrict village cadres effectively. Both village cadres and village group cadres achieve rural management objectives and harvest their interests by minimalism and balancing skill.