- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 蕲春方言双及物结构研究    

姓名:

 林苑    

学科代码:

 050102    

学科专业:

 语言学及应用语言学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 文学硕士    

学位年度:

 2015    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 文学院    

研究方向:

 蕲春方言语法    

第一导师姓名:

 宋作艳    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学文学院    

提交日期:

 2015-05-29    

答辩日期:

 2015-05-26    

外文题名:

 A STUDY OF DITRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTION IN QICHUN DIALECT    

中文摘要:
本文以蕲春方言双及物结构作为研究对象,采用文献研究和调查研究的方法,对双宾A式、双宾B式和介宾补语式这三种双及物格式进行了对比分析并探讨了它们之间的关系。全文共四章。第一章是绪论,主要介绍前人关于双及物结构的研究,本文的研究方法、研究对象和语料来源。第二章分析了三种双及物结构,主要涉及直接宾语的运动方向和动词的分类等问题。依据语义标准,将动词分为了三大类、八小类,分别是一般给予类、制作类、“称说”类、“喷吐”类、一般取得类、“吃用”类、“差欠”类和 “借”类。三种结构对动词的选择不同。“制作”类动词不能进入双宾A式,“喷吐”类动词、“吃用”类动词、“差欠”类动词和大部分“称说”类动词只能进入双宾A式。一般给予类动词可以进入这三种结构,但是当地人更倾向于使用双宾B式。一般取得类动词进入双宾A式表达内向义,进入双宾B式和介宾补语式表达外向义。“借”类动词进入双宾A式有歧义,进入其他两种结构中表达外向义。蕲春方言中表达外向义最基本的双及物结构为双宾B式,当直接宾语特别复杂或者比较书面语化时倾向使用介宾补语式。双宾A式既可以表达外向义,也可以表达内向义,双宾B式和介宾补语式只能表达外向义,说明这里构式义大于动词义。第三章通过文献语料、结构意义和类型学等方面的证据,证明了双宾A式和双宾B式没有生成推导关系,双宾A式和介宾补语式也没有推导关系,双宾B式是由介宾补语式省略介词[ʂʅ33]而来。第四章为结语,总结本文的主要结论和存在的问题,为进一步研究指明方向。
外文摘要:
Ditransitive constructions in Qichun Dialect are investigated in this study. By means of literature induction and remote interview, Double Object Construction A (DOCA), Double Object Construction B (DOCB) and dative construction are analyzed. The chapters are arranged as follows: The first chapter is the introduction, in which I mainly introduce the research results on ditransitive constructions, research methods, research object as well as data sources.In the second chapter, the construction meaning and the syntactic and semantic features of these three constuctions are studied, which contains motion direction of the direct object and the verb classification. By the standards of semantic function, the verbs could be classified into three broad groups and eight subgroups, mainly including the ones of “give” meaning, the ones of “make” meaning, the ones of “call” meaning, the ones of “pour” meaning, the ones of “worry” meaning, the ones of “get” meaning, the ones of “consume” meaning, the ones of “own” meaning and the ones of “borrow” meaning. Verbs of “give” meaning can enter these there structures, but the locals prefer to use DOCB. DOCA expresses inward meaning while DOCB expresses outward meaning when verbs of “get” meaning in it. DOCA is ambiguous while DOCB and the dative construction express outward meaning when having verbs of “borrow” meaning. The basic ditransitive construction is DOCB, which is used to express outward meaning in Qichun dialect. The locals tend to use the dative construction when the direct object is particularly complex or formal. DOCA can express both outward and inward meaning, but DOCB and the dative construction can only express outward meaning, which means constructional meaning is more important the meaning of verbs.In the third chapter, based on the literature, structure meaning and the evidence from typology, we could prove that there is no derivation relationship between DOCA and DOCB, neither do DOCA and the dative construction. DOCB is a preposition omission of the dative construction.The last chapter is the summary. The research results and the remaining problems are summarized, and it also points out the direction for further research.
参考文献总数:

 101    

馆藏号:

 硕050102/1546    

开放日期:

 2015-05-29    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式