近年来，国际社会对大型恐怖组织打击力度空前,这使国际恐怖主义格局产生了巨大变化，也为“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪发展提供了新的可能与机遇。面对我国规制“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪可能或已经出现的刑事风险及现存刑事规制体系存在的缺陷，我国应当进行一定的完善。本文将主要内容划分为四个部分来论述：

     第一部分，对“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的定义、演进展开研究，总结“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的特征，并对境外“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪进行分类，“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的特征主要有个体性、自由流动性、隐蔽性、突发性及恐怖性。通过分析境外“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪案例，“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪可分为心理障碍型、怨恨复仇型、意识形态型三种。

     第二部分，参考境外“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪治理经验，对美国、欧盟地区以及我国香港地区“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪治理经验进行了考察，并总结了境外治理经验于我国的借鉴意义。

     第三部分，从反恐刑法和定罪量刑两方面提出我国“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的刑事规制缺陷，从反恐刑法角度，尚存缺陷为缺乏集中的反恐刑法体系、“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪客体界定模糊，从定罪和量刑角度，尚存缺陷为核心恐怖主义活动罪名的缺失、现存刑事处罚体系存在过严的趋势、犯罪危害程度缺乏明确标准。

     最后一部分，针对上述缺陷，提出两方面完善建议，第一方面，应当明确“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的刑事规制政策，研究运用刑事手段规制“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的必要性，坚持一般预防与特殊预防并行，提出完善我国“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪一般预防措施的建议并明确宽严相济的刑事处罚模式；第二方面，应当完善“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的刑事立法，从建立集中的反恐刑法体系、明确界定“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪相关概念、增设“独狼”式恐怖活动罪、提高反恐刑法精细化水平四个角度入手。

     本文的创新点在于虽然我国已经出台《反恐怖主义法》对恐怖主义进行专门规制，但对于“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪针对性的刑事规制手段仍然较少，构建完善的“独狼”式恐怖主义犯罪的刑事规制路径有必要性和创新性。

   In recent years, the international community has attacked large-scale terrorist organizations with unprecedented intensity, which has brought about tremendous changes in the pattern of international terrorism, and has also provided new possibilities and opportunities for the development of "lone wolf" terrorist crimes. In the face of the possible or existing criminal risks and the defects in the existing criminal regulation system of "lone wolf" terrorism crime in China, China should make some improvements. This paper divides the main content into four chapters to discuss:

   The first part is to study the definition and evolution of "lone wolf" type terrorist crimes, summarize the characteristics of "lone wolf" type terrorist crimes, and classify overseas "lone wolf" type terrorist crimes, "lone wolf" type The characteristics of terrorist crimes mainly include individuality, free mobility, concealment, suddenness and terrorism. By analyzing the cases of “lone wolf” terrorist crimes abroad, “lone wolf” terrorist crimes can be divided into three types: psychological obstacle type, resentment and revenge type, and ideological type.

   In the second part, with reference to the overseas "lone wolf" terrorist crime governance experience, it examines the "lone wolf" terrorist crime governance experience in the United States, the European Union, and my country's Hong Kong region, and summarizes the lessons of foreign experience in my country significance.

   The third part, from the anti-terrorism criminal law and conviction and sentencing, proposes the criminal regulation flaws of my country’s "lone wolf" terrorism crimes. From the perspective of the anti-terrorism criminal law, the remaining flaws are the lack of a centralized anti-terrorism criminal law system and the "lone wolf" terrorism. The definition of criminal objects is vague. From the perspective of conviction and sentencing, the remaining shortcomings are the lack of core terrorist crimes, the tendency of the existing criminal punishment system to be too strict, and the lack of clear standards for the degree of criminal harm.  

   In the last part, in view of the above-mentioned shortcomings, two suggestions are put forward. The first aspect is to clarify the criminal regulation policy of "lone wolf" type terrorist crimes, and study the necessity of using criminal means to regulate "lone wolf" type terrorist crimes. Adhere to the parallel between general prevention and special prevention, put forward suggestions to improve the general preventive measures of "lone wolf" terrorist crimes in our country, and clarify the criminal punishment mode of both leniency and strictness; second, the criminal legislation for "lone wolf" terrorist crimes should be improved It starts from four perspectives: establishing a centralized anti-terrorism criminal law system, clearly defining the related concepts of "lone wolf" terrorism crimes, adding a "lone wolf" terrorist activity crime, and improving the level of refinement of the anti-terrorism criminal law.

   The innovation of this article is that although my country has issued the "Anti-Terrorism Law" to specifically regulate terrorism, there are still fewer targeted criminal regulations for "lone wolf" terrorism crimes, and a complete "lone wolf" type has been constructed. The criminal regulation path of terrorism crime is necessary and innovative.