《民法典》第997条规定了人格权禁令制度，以回应为人格权提供及时性、全方位保护的时代之问。但《民事诉讼法》等相关程序法中并无直接对应的程序为其提供运行轨道，恐难以达到为人格权提供快捷高效保护的立法初衷。人格权禁令性质上属于独立的程序性规范，是多种人格权请求权的非诉讼实现路径，且与既有的诉前行为保全制度有不可忽视的差异。司法实践中应当明确颁布人格权禁令的要件化审理标准与不同判断维度，同时为被申请人提供最低限度的程序保障。为了确保人格权禁令的有效落实，需要进一步明确禁令的申请主体、管辖法院、执行机关以及程序转化机制。禁令原则上应当配合保证金适用，但法官仍需进行个案权衡。禁令仅具有实体法上的执行力，不具有诉讼法意义上的既判力。

Article 997 of the "Civil Code" stipulates the injunction system of personality rights, in response to the question of the times to provide timely and comprehensive protection for personality rights. However, there is no direct corresponding procedure in the relevant procedural laws such as the "Civil Procedure Law" to provide a running track for it, and it may be difficult to achieve the original legislative purpose of providing fast and efficient protection of personality rights. Personality right injunction is an independent procedural norm in nature. It is a non-litigation realization path for a variety of personality rights claims, and it is apparently different from the existing pre-litigation behavior preservation system. In judicial practice, the trial standards and different judgment dimensions for the decree of personality right injunctions should be clearly defined, and at the same time, minimum procedural guarantees should be provided for the respondent. In order to ensure the effective implementation of the personality right injunction, it is necessary to further clarify the applicant for the injunction, the jurisdictional court, the executive authority and the procedure transformation mechanism. In principle, the injunction should be applied in conjunction with the bond, but the judge still needs to weigh the case on a case-by-case basis. An injunction is only enforceable in substantive law, not res judicata in the sense of procedural law.