| 中文题名： | “无所私的感情”——论梁漱溟的理性观 |
| 姓名： | |
| 保密级别： | 公开 |
| 论文语种： | 中文 |
| 学科代码： | 010105 |
| 学科专业： | |
| 学生类型： | 硕士 |
| 学位： | 哲学硕士 |
| 学位类型： | |
| 学位年度： | 2021 |
| 校区： | |
| 学院： | |
| 研究方向： | 中西伦理学思想史 |
| 第一导师姓名： | |
| 第一导师单位： | |
| 提交日期： | 2021-05-25 |
| 答辩日期： | 2021-05-28 |
| 外文题名： | “NO PRIVATE EMOTION” -- ON LIANG SHUMING’S RATIONAL VIEW |
| 中文关键词： | |
| 外文关键词： | Liang Shuming ; Rationality ; Reason ; Confucianism ; Rationality ; autonomy ; Sense of life |
| 中文摘要： |
置身于晚清以来中西文化之争的这一基本的思想史背景之下，梁漱溟将“认识老中国，建设新中国”视为自己毕生关注的核心问题。尽管不无对中国自身的文化传统的批评，但与当时“五四”新文化运动的激进的反传统的思潮判然有别的是，梁漱溟从根本上采取了要为儒家进行辩护的立场。梁漱溟在《中国文化要义》中首次提出的理性概念，正是其在晚清以来中西文化之争的背景之下，为儒家立场提供了哲学依据的关键性概念。梁漱溟的理性概念不仅在其自身的论述中具有与本能、理智相对应的清晰的义理结构；并且在错综的中西思想交汇之中具有更为深刻的，值得进一步阐发的含义。本研究首先着重关注了梁漱溟所处的中国近现代思想史背景，揭示了理性概念所从出的基本的时代问题，使概念的分析在历史背景和问题意识中得到更为直观的呈现。随后，本研究就梁漱溟自身的论述对其理性概念以及作为其理性概念的最初形态的直觉概念进行脉络梳理和重构论证。在此基础之上，就梁漱溟的理性概念超越了将理性等同于理智的日常语言的用法，与西方哲学尤其是德国观念论中围绕理性对理智之超越性的论述结构进行了一个对比研究，揭示出了二者在对超越理智之理性的追求的共识背后所反映的共通的问题域。尽管存在共通的问题域，梁漱溟对理性概念的“无所私的感情”的描述性定义，其包含了不同于西方哲学中理性主义对于“理性自主”的追求而反映了其明确的儒学渊源，因此，本研究展开了一个简要的溯源，澄清梁漱溟的理性概念与宋明乃至先秦儒学具有一致的“生命感通”的底色。以概念分析、比较和溯源为基础将梁漱溟的理性概念进行一个丰富而立体的呈现之后，本研究一方面尝试破除对将梁漱溟简单视为一个保守主义者的意见，将其理性概念视为对儒家理性观的现代重构；另一方面，立足于当下的现实指明了梁漱溟思想超越一时之问题，对于现代中国而言仍然具有当代性。
﹀
|
| 外文摘要： |
Under the background of the cultural conflict between China and the West since the late Qing Dynasty, Liang Shuming regarded "knowing the old China and building the new China" as the core issue of his whole life. Although not without criticism of China's own cultural tradition, but in contrast to the "May 4th" New Culture Movement of the radical anti-tradition trend of thought is that Liang Shuming fundamentally took a stand to defend Confucianism. Liang shuming first put forward the concept of rationality in the essence of Chinese culture, which was the key concept that provided the philosophical basis for the Confucian standpoint under the background of the conflict between Chinese culture and western culture since the late qing dynasty. Liang Shuming's rational concept not only has a clear logic structure corresponding to instinct and reason in its own discourse; Moreover, it has a more profound meaning in the confluence of Chinese and Western thoughts, which is worth further elucidating. This study first focuses on the background of Liang Shuming's modern and contemporary ideological history in China, and reveals the basic problems of The Times arising from the rational concept, so that the analysis of the concept can be presented in a more concrete way in the historical background and problem consciousness. Then, based on Liang Shuming's own treatise, this paper sorts out and reconstructs Liang Shuming's rational concept and his intuitive concept as the initial form of his rational concept. On this basis, liang shu-ming's rational concept beyond the equating rational to rational everyday language usage, with the western philosophy, especially around the rational transcendence of reason in the German idealism conducted a comparative study of structure, reveals both in pursuit of the rationality of beyond reason common consensus behind is a reflection of the problem domain. Although there are common problem areas, Liang Shuming's descriptive definition of the concept of rationality as "unselfish feeling" reflects its explicit Confucian origin, which is different from the rationalism's pursuit of "rational autonomy" in Western philosophy. Therefore, this study explores a brief trace to its origin. Clarifying Liang Shuming's rational concept has the same background color of "sense of life" with the Song and Ming Dynasties and even pre-Qin Confucianism. On the basis of conceptual analysis, comparison and traceability, Liang Shuming's concept of rationality is presented in a rich and three-dimensional way. On the one hand, this study tries to get rid of the opinion that Liang Shuming is simply regarded as a conservative, and regards his concept of rationality as a modern reconstruction of Confucian concept of rationality. On the other hand, based on the current reality, Liang Shuming's thought is more than a temporary problem, and it is still contemporary for modern China.
﹀
|
| 参考文献总数： | 84 |
| 作者简介： | 申霖，北京师范大学伦理学专业硕士研究生，导师为贾新奇。 |
| 馆藏号： | 硕010105/21002 |
| 开放日期： | 2022-06-29 |
谷歌
