中文题名: | 行政不作为违法的国家赔偿构成要件 |
姓名: | |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 030101K |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 学士 |
学位: | 法学学士 |
学位年度: | 2007 |
学校: | 北京师范大学 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2007-06-30 |
答辩日期: | 2007-06-01 |
外文题名: | 无 |
中文关键词: | |
外文关键词: | administrative nonfeasance illegally ; national indemnification ; constituent |
中文摘要: |
随着我国立法的逐步完善和人民群众法律意识的提高,公民、法人和其他组织状告行政机关不作为的案件数量不断上升,行政不作为现象引起社会各界的广泛关注。而我国《国家赔偿法》没有明确规定因行政不作为侵害公民、法人或其他组织合法权益时国家是否承担赔偿责任,且在司法实践中和理论界对于这个问题的认识和意见也不一致。笔者结合行政法的基础理论,区分了行政不作为与行政不作为违法,并以国家赔偿违法归责原则为指导,深入分析了行政不作为行为违法的国家赔偿构成要件,重点探讨了行政不作为违法、损害及因果关系等几个要件,以期为完善我国行政不作为国家赔偿制度提出参考意见。 |
外文摘要: |
Along with the consummation of our country legislation and the enhancement of people's law consciousness, the number of the cases in which citizens, juridical persons, or the other legal organizations sue the administrative organ's nonfeasance has risen gradually. More and more people have paid attention to the administrative nonfeasance phenomenon. But the national indemnification law does not give a clear definition on obligation of illegal nonfeasance when the rights and interests of citizens, juridical persons, or the other legal organizations are harmed; the understanding and opinions about the question are not consistent in judicial practice and theory. In this article, According to the basic theories of administration law ,the author differentiated the administration nonfeasance and the administration nonfeasance illegally, and the national compensation law illegal turned over to the responsibility principle is the instruction, thoroughly analyzed the constitution of national indemnification for administration nonfeasance illegally ,discussed the administration nonfeasance illegally, harm and causal relation several important documents with emphasis, and explained own opinion. In order to consummate our country national indemnification for administration nonfeasance illegally give own comment. |
参考文献总数: | 17 |
馆藏号: | 本030101K/07035 |
开放日期: | 2024-03-14 |