“俄罗斯党”是一个以复兴俄罗斯民族精神传统及历史文化为共同目标的知识分子群体。从19世纪到20世纪，“俄罗斯党”所推崇的俄罗斯民族主义始终存在于国家政治与社会文化之中，在不同时段发挥着重要影响，1965-1975年是其活动的重要时期。这一知识分子群体在苏联的文化领域发展出一定规模，既背靠一些代表性的文学刊物作为宣传平台，也有协会组织作为行动中心，还有勃列日涅夫及其领导层的默许与庇护。

“俄罗斯党”的历史起源于沙俄时期，其民族主义思想在苏联时期得到继承与延续。 “俄罗斯党”的苏联知识分子在社会文化领域的活动揭示了其具有时代特色的思想特征、行为逻辑和局限性。

第一章阐述了“俄罗斯党”在帝俄时期发端至苏联时期复兴的历史背景，指出宣扬俄罗斯民族优越性、排斥外来思想和文化是俄罗斯民族主义的共有特征。

第二章集中论述1965-1975年内“俄罗斯党”的具体活动，保护协会及其实践重塑了俄罗斯民族的历史记忆，杂志刊物从思想层面确立了道德传统复兴的必要性及排斥西方文化和犹太复国主义思想的紧迫性。

第三章通过文学争论的具体事例讨论了“俄罗斯党”发展面临的局限性，苏联官方倡导的无产阶级国际主义与俄罗斯民族主义存在天然的对立，“俄罗斯党”逐渐极端的民族主义思想必然受到官方的约制与打压，其自身理论的匮乏与不切实际也导致其影响力微弱。

结论：1965-1975年间“俄罗斯党”对俄罗斯民族历史遗产的保护与宣传、自然环境保护号召方面确有积极意义，但其极端的排他性思想对苏联其他民族，尤其是犹太人群体构成较大威胁，具有社会危害性。

The “Russian Party” is a group of intelligentsia with the common goal of reviving Russian traditional mentality and historical culture. From the 19th century to the 20th century, the Russian nationalism advocated by the “Russian Party” has always existed in national politics and social culture, and played an essential role in different periods. 1965-1975 is a crucial period. The intellectuals of the “Russian Party” expanded their influence in the cultural sphere of the Soviet Union, with the help of some certain literary publications to promulgate their ideas, the VOOPIK (the All-Russian Society for the Preservation of Historical and Cultural Monuments) to organize their activities, and the tacit approval of Brezhnev and his leadership with asylum.

The “Russian Party” originated from the Imperial Russia and carried on some of its ideas into the Soviet Union. The “Russian Party” intelligentsia actively involved in the social and cultural spheres of Soviet society, demonstrating their ideological attributes, behavioral logic, and practical dilemma.

The first chapter explicates the historical background of the “Russian Party” from the imperial period to the Soviet Union’s revival, and illuminates the common characteristics of Russian nationalism which boil down to the superiority of the Russian nation and the exclusion of foreign ideas and cultures.

The second chapter concentrates on the specific activities of the “Russian Party.” The VOOPIK and its practice reshaped the historical memory of the Russians, and the publications underscored the necessity of revitalizing moral traditions and the urgency of repelling Western bourgeois culture and Zionist ideas.

Analyzing a case of literary debate, the third chapter discusses the development dilemma faced by the “Russian Party.” There is an inherent conflict between proletarian internationalism advocated by the Soviet Union and Russian nationalism. Due to the gradually ideological polarization the “Russian Party” was inevitably restricted and suppressed by the authorities. Besides, the dearth and impracticality of its theory also led to the weak influence of the “Russian Party.”

In general, the “Russian Party” from 1965 to 1975 exerted a positive influence on the protection and knowledge dissemination of the Russian historical heritage, and the appeal for environmental conservation. While, the extreme exclusivity of the “Russian Party”, which was socially hazardous, posed a great threat to the other ethnic groups in the Soviet Union, especially the Jewish community.