语言是反映社会的一面镜子，网络流行语正是这面镜子中的一处独特部分。学界对于网络流行语的研究自互联网在中国流行伊始就已开始，且涵盖了语言学、社会学、心理学、传播学等多个学科领域；但是，对于“矛盾式”网络流行语的研究才刚刚起步且主要集中于社会学领域。其中，“矛盾式”网络流行语指的是：首先在网络世界中被创造和广泛接受、传播并使用的，由两个或两个以上在语义上相对或存在一定矛盾的词语组合而成的，表面上看似不合逻辑、有悖常理的新词或新词组。如“女汉子”“土豪”“云监工”等，皆属于“矛盾式”网络流行语范畴。

    本文共分为六个章节，运用归纳法、阐释法、例证法、比较研究等方法开展研究。首先，绪论部分对本文的研究思路、研究目标等进行说明，并在第一章对网络流行语的发展与研究情况进行回顾。其次，分别从结构类型和组成成分两个方面对收集到的“矛盾式”网络流行语语料进行语法结构分析；接着，剖析“矛盾式”网络流行语的语义及其矛盾；再次，借助认知语言学的相关知识对“矛盾式”网络流行语的认知过程进行解读，并分析其作为矛盾修辞的表达特点和效果；最后，在上述研究的基础上，结合社会现实，对“矛盾式”网络流行语的发展生命力和未来进行预测与展望。希望本篇对“矛盾式”网络流行语的探讨能够为网络流行语语言学研究提供崭新的思路和启发。

Language is a mirror that reflects the society, and the Internet buzzwords are a unique part of it. The study of the Internet buzzwords has started since the popularity of the Internet in China and covers different subjects such as linguistics, sociology, psychology and communication. However, the study of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords has just started, which mainly focuses on sociology. Contradictory Internet Buzzwords refer to those seemingly illogical and unreasonable new words or phrases that are first created and widely accepted, spread and used on the internet and composed of two or more words that are contradictory. For example, "女汉子(female man)", "土豪(tuhao)" and "云监工(cloud supervisor)" belong to the category of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords.

This paper is divided into six chapters, adopting the research methods including induction, interpretation, illustration and comparative research to solve the problems. First of all, some basic information of the research, such as the research design and the research object are introduced. Meanwhile, the development and the study of Internet Buzzwords are also reviewed. Secondly, the collected corpus of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords are analyzed grammatically on both structures and compositions. Thirdly, from the perspectives of semantic analysis, the meanings and the controversy of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords are explained. Fourthly, the cognitive process of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords are interpreted with the relevant knowledge of cognitive linguistics, following with the analysis of the expressing characteristics and effects of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords as oxymoron. Last but not least, on the basis of the above research results and the social reality, the development vitality and future of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords are predicted and prospected. It is hoped that this study of Contradictory Internet Buzzwords can provide brand new ideas and inspirations for the linguistics research of the Internet Buzzwords.