中文题名: | 中文版批判性思维量表的修订 |
姓名: | |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | 中文 |
学科代码: | 071101 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 学士 |
学位: | 理学学士 |
学位年度: | 2017 |
学校: | 北京师范大学 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2017-06-21 |
答辩日期: | 2017-05-18 |
外文题名: | The Revision of Critical Thinking Scale of Chinese Version |
中文关键词: | |
中文摘要: |
本研究选用新编制的自编中文批判性思维量表,以4809名被试为对象,进行了量表修订。该量表是在哈珀恩批判性测评(The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment,HCTA)的基础上编制而成的。采用了Cronbach's α系数和斯布校正系数对量表进行检验,发现量表的信度在一般信度。项目分析中,发现唯有决策与问题解决维度的许多题项区分度较低,需要进一步的修订,同时,该维度的题项和总分的相关也较低。以各维度之间的相关做比较,发现各维度之间只有中等程度的相关,而各维度与总分有高相关,表面了量表各维度测量的是不同方面的能力,量表具有一定的结构效度。最后,方差分析的结果,发现了管理学、艺术学、土木建筑、装备制造、财经商贸和电子信息等几个门类的分数显著低于其他一些门类。
﹀
|
外文摘要: |
Based on 4809 participants, the present study made a revision for the newly self-designed critical thinking scale of Chinese Version. The scale was designed on the basis of the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment(HCTA).The study used Cronbach’αand Spearman-Brown formula as methods and found that the reliability of self-designed scale is normal. The result of item analysis showed that the questions from dimension of problem solving only had low discrimination low correlation with total score. The correlations were moderate between the four dimensions but were strong between those dimensions and total score, it indicated the scale had certain construct validity. At last, the study found that some kind of majors like Science of Art, Science of Management and the others were significantly low than another majors via ANOVA analysis.
﹀
|
参考文献总数: | 11 |
作者简介: | 无 |
插图总数: | 0 |
插表总数: | 12 |
馆藏号: | 本071101/17070 |
开放日期: | 2017-11-16 |