西六师的地望大体上可以确定，它们的性质皆为大都、大县，殷八师也是如此。西六师、殷八师在西周王畿的统治架构中处于地方次中心的地位，而诸师的“私臣化”（公卿大夫之族从王室的析产离居）导致了西周晚季王权的衰微，也是盘庚迁殷的动因。与西六师存在对应关系的六乡并不在国郊，六遂也不在野，乡遂制度以乡遂当国野的理论基础不能成立，其所谓国野的“对立”也值得商榷。

The location of Xiliushi（西六师） could be confirmed, they are all big Du（都） or Xian（县）, so as Yinbashi（殷八师）. Xiliushi（西六师） and Yinbashi（殷八师） are locally sub-central in the entire region of XiZhou（西周） dynasty and their “privacation” had produced the weakness of kingdom since the end of this dynasty, which also resulted Pangeng′（盘庚）remove to Yin（殷）. Liuxiang（六乡） were not surrounding Guo（国）, also Liusui（六遂） were not in Ye（野）, Xiangsui（乡遂） construction theory which is based on that thus could not be true. The advocated “confront” between Guo（国） and Ye（野）by such theory should be douted too.