当今世界，技术全面革新，营销不断升级，网络空间持续发展，相关弊端与问题随之凸显，其中之一就是网络暴力现象的日益加重。司法实践中，对于网络暴力民事侵权，多以赔礼道歉、赔偿损失等手段作为赔偿方式；若涉及行政法相关，则多以15日以下拘留、适当罚款的惩罚方式为主。上述处罚都相对较轻。在刑法中，有侮辱罪、诽谤罪、侵犯公民个人信息罪、寻衅滋事罪等罪名对网络暴力加以规定。但是这些规定大都以传统暴力行为为规制对象，因而与网络暴力的行为特征并不兼容，在实践中难以准确用来对网络暴力行为进行有效刑事责任追究。此外，司法认定标准不明、个人信息力度保护不足、侦查活动启动困难、相关犯罪证据保存困难等问题长期得不到解决，也是网络暴力日益猖獗的重要原因。

本文将通过探析当前网络暴力刑法规制现状，结合当下典型网络暴力案件，分析网络暴力刑法规制不足的原因。在对比、吸收域外国家优秀经验的同时，拟提出完善我国网络暴力行为刑法规制路径的建议。对于人肉搜索类网络暴力，笔者建议从明确侵犯公民个人信息行为中的“非法获取”的定义、对非法利用行为进一步规制、适度扩大个人信息认定范围和明确人肉搜索类网络暴力中“严重后果”的概念四方面入手。对于言语攻击类网络暴力，笔者建议从明确“攻击性行为”的概念、明确网络言语暴力中“暴力”的含义两方面入手。对于网络谣言类网络暴力，笔者建议从明确网络谣言类网络暴力的认定标准、完善相关司法解释、明确网络谣言类网络暴力中“严重后果”的含义三方面入手。针对于是否应当设立网络暴力罪、网络暴力致人死亡的刑事责任如何确认、严重网络暴力的立案机制和起诉条件如何完善以及现行网络实名制如何改进等争议问题，笔者亦提出了个人看法，以期助益于破解当下的规制困境，促进我国网络社会良性发展。

In today's world, with the comprehensive innovation of technology, the continuous upgrading of marketing and the continuous development of cyberspace, relative drawbacks and problems are highlighted, one of which is the increasingly aggravated phenomenon of cyber violence. In judicial practice, for the civil infringement of network violence, most of the means for compensation are apology, indemnity, etc. If it is related to administrative law, it is mainly punished by less than 15 days detention and appropriate fine. These penalties are relatively light. In the criminal law, there are the crime of insulting, defamation, infringement of citizens' personal information, crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble and other charges to provide for cyber violence. However, most of these regulations take traditional violent acts as the object of regulation, so they are not compatible with the characteristics of cyber violence. In practice, it is difficult to accurately apply them to effectively investigate the criminal responsibility of cyber violence. In addition, unclear standards for judicial determination, insufficient protection of personal information, difficulties in starting investigative activities, and difficulties in preserving evidence of related crimes remain unresolved for a long time, which are also important reasons for the increasingly rampant cyber violence.

By analyzing the current situation of cyber violence criminal law regulation, and combining with the current typical cyber violence cases, this paper will analyze the reasons for the insufficient regulation of cyber violence criminal law. While comparing and absorbing the excellent experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the regulation path of criminal law of cyber violence. As for the cyber violence of human flesh search, the author suggests to start from four aspects: clarifying the definition of "illegal acquisition" in the behavior of infringing citizens' personal information, further regulating the illegal use behavior, moderately expanding the scope of identification of personal information and clarifying the concept of "serious consequences" in the cyber violence of human flesh search. For the verbal aggression type of cyber violence, the author suggests to clarify the concept of "aggressive behavior" and clarify the meaning of "violence" in the cyber verbal violence. As for the Internet rumor violence, the author suggests to start from three aspects: clarifying the identification standard of Internet rumor violence, perfecting relevant judicial interpretation, and clarifying the meaning of "serious consequences" in Internet rumor violence. In view of such controversial issues as whether cyber violence crime should be established, how to confirm the criminal responsibility for cyber violence resulting in death, how to improve the registration mechanism and prosecution conditions for serious cyber violence, and how to improve the current cyber real-name system, the author also puts forward personal views with a view to contributing to the resolution of the current regulation dilemma and promoting the healthy development of our cyber society.