第三人执行异议是指在执行程序中，第三人对执行标的主张独立的实体权利，要求排除人民法院对特定标的物的强制执行。设立执行异议制度旨在保护第三人的合法权益，及时纠正人民法院违法或不当的执行行为，维护法律的权威和公正。但是，由于现行法律规定过于笼统和含糊，加上法律机制不够完善合理，执行异议制度尚未能发挥其应有有效保障第三人的合法权利的作用。因此，执行异议制度的改革和完善，具有重要的理论和现实意义。本文通过对我国现行执行异议制度的分析，指出 了我国执行异议制度的缺陷，并通过借鉴世界各国的立法，着重就我国第三人异议制度应如何进行立法完善进行探讨。

the definition as execution objection: the methods and system taken by execution organs to deal with the requests of correction and remedy raised by outsiders when their legal rights were infringed due to illegal or inappropriate executive activities. the basis of objection system in civil execution procedure is to protect the legal rights of inappropriate executive activities, to effectively prevent those infringements from happening and provide legal remedies that the legal rights of inappropriate executive activities were often infringed due to illegal by the people＇s court.However,the contents of execution objection described by Chinese Civil Procedure Law are too ambiguous .in addition, the system of law is not reasonable, and can not effectively protect legal rights of inappropriate ｅxｅcutive activities.Thus,to enforce and perfect objection system in civil execution procedure is very important in theory and reality. This article, analyzes the current dissent in execution objection system, coming to the blemish of the objection system and learns from the legislations of other counties. This article emphasizes that how to reform and enrich the execution objection system.