本文主要关注现代汉语中与“的”字结构相关的形义错配现象。具体来说，包括伪领属结构、伪名量结构以及与“是……的”焦点结构相关的伪定语。除此之外，本文也关注汉英及汉语方言在伪定语上的参数差异。在前人研究的基础上，在生成语法的框架下，本文对各类伪定语的形成动因与内部构造进行了深入的句法剖析，以还原其初始的基本语义，并最终使其形式和意义得到匹配。

全文共分为六章，以下为各章的基本内容：

第1章为全文绪论，主要介绍选题缘起、国内外研究现状以及本文的研究目标和研究意义。除此之外，本章还对“形义错配”作了重新的界定与分类，并指出尽管目前相关的研究很多，但它们提出的方案都有可以继续改进的空间。

第2章主要关注伪领属结构。在此之前，本章先对汉语中的“的”字领属结构作了重新的整理与划分，并从句法上将其分为不含动词型、省略动词型和隐含动词型三种，分别对应真领属结构、隐性关系结构和伪领属结构。在本文的分析框架下，伪领属结构是一个以标句词“的”为核心的最大投射CP，其内部同时包含名物化词头Nom、轻动词v以及空动词e。与此同时，根据其表达的不同事件类型，伪领属结构可进一步区分为技能性、指派性、关涉性（包括蒙受类和致使类）三种，分别对应活动事件、状态事件、变化事件和致使事件。由此可知，几乎所有类型的事件都可以出现在伪领属结构的内部。

第3章主要关注伪名量结构。根据量词性质的不同，伪名量结构可进一步区分为期间性和频率性两种，其中前者由时量成分组成，而后者由动量成分组成。二者在句法表现上的差异本质上源于二者具有不同的内部构造。具体来说，期间性伪名量结构是一个以标句词“的”为核心的最大投射CP，而频率性伪名量结构是一个具有独立功能投射的数量短语NumP。与此同时，本章还修正了以往将动词核心从最底层开始移位的方案，认为有形的动词核心在伪名量结构的上层生成，而最底层的VP则以复指的空动词e为核心。由此来看，伪领属结构和伪名量结构在句法结构上是非常相似的，二者均属于隐含动词型。

第4章主要关注与焦点结构相关的伪定语。通过几种句式之间的变换分析，本章发现与焦点结构相关的伪定语可大致分为领属型和非领属型两种，而非领属型又可进一步分为技能性和非技能性两大类，不同类型的伪定语的句法表现不同。在本文的分析框架下，焦点结构中的“是”被分析为焦点短语的中心语Foc，而其后的“的”则被分析为标句词C。综合来看，此类伪定语的形成主要是由语用因素导致的。

第5章主要关注汉英及汉语方言在伪定语上的参数差异。具体来说，汉英在伪定语问题上的共时差异归根结底是其名物化词头形态的差异，而汉语方言在伪定语问题上的共时差异归根结底是其空动词允准度的差异。

第6章为全文结语。结合上文的分析，本章对伪定语结构中“的”的性质与功能作了一个归纳，同时梳理出本文的主要结论。除此之外，本章还提出了一些尚待解决的关键性问题，以为此后的研究指明方向。

This paper mainly focuses on the syntax-semantics mismatches of De-construction in Mandarin Chinese, including pseudo possessives, pseudo noun-quantifiers and pseudo attributives related to focus construction. In addition, this paper also focuses on the parameter differences between Chinese-English and Chinese dialects on pseudo attributive. Based on the previous studies, this paper analyses the forming motivations and internal structures of different pseudo attributives with the theory of Generative Grammar, aiming to restore their initial semantics which keeps the congruity with their syntactic forms.

This paper is divided into six chapters. The basic contents of each chapter are as follows:

Chapter 1 is the introduction, which introduces the reason for topic selection, the research status, as well as the goal and significance of this paper. In addition, this chapter also redefines and classifies the phenomenon of syntax-semantics mismatches, pointing out that further reasearches are still in need although there have been plenty of solutions related to this issue.

Chapter 2 mainly focuses on pseudo possessives, after the reorganization of possessive constructions in Mandarin Chinese, which can be syntactically divided into three types: non-verb type, verb-ellipsis type and verb-implication type, corresponding to genuine possessive construction, covert relative construction and pseudo possessive construction respectively. In the view of this paper, pseudo possessive construction can be seen as a maximum projection CP with De as its head, which contains nominalizer Nom, light verb v and empty verb e. According to the type of event it expresses, pseudo possessive construction can be further divided into three types: skill, assignment and correlation (including affected type and causative type), corresponding to activity event, state event, change event and causative event respectively. As it shows, almost all types of events can be expressed by pseudo possessive construction.

Chapter 3 mainly focuses on pseudo noun-quantifiers. According to the property of different quantifiers, this construction can be divided into two types: duration and frequency. The former is composed of time-quantifier, while the latter is composed of verb-quantifier. The syntactic differences between them are essentially due to their different internal structures. Specifically, the durationn type is a maximum projection CP with De as its head, while the frequency type is an independent functional projection NumP. At the same time, this chapter also revises the previous schemes of moving the core verb from the bottom, but holds that the core verb is generated at the upper layer directly, while the lowest VP takes the empty veb e as its head. From this point of view, pseudo possessives and pseudo noun-quantifiers are very similar in syntactic structure, both of which belong to verb-implication type.

Chapter 4 mainly focuses on pseudo attributives related to focus construction. With the transformation among several sentence patterns, this chapter finds that these pseudo attributives can be roughly divided into two types: possessive type and non-possessive type, while the latter can be further divided into skill type and non-skill type. Different types of pseudo attributives have different syntactic performances. In the view of this paper, focus marker Shi is regarded as the head of focus phrase FocP, while De is regarded as complementizer C. This kind of pseudo attributives are mainly attributed to pragmatic factors.

Chapter 5 mainly focuses on the parameter differences between Chinese-English and Chinese dialects on pseudo attributive. Specifically, the differences between Chinese and English are ultimately due to the different morphologies of their nominalizer Nom, while the differences among Chinese dialects are related to their licensing degrees of empty verb e in essence.

Chapter 6 is the conclusion, which summarizes the characteristic and function of De in pseudo attributive constructions, and restates the main views of the paper. Furthermore, this chapter also puts forward some key issues to be solved in the future.