辞例是人们整理归纳出的典籍行文规律，这项工作最早可以上溯至先秦。 有清以来，学者们十分关注《毛诗》经传辞例研究，他们通过对《毛诗》经 传辞例的整理与应用疏通诗义，把握经传的行文体系。本文分别论述其整理 与应用研究，旨在对前人的成果作出总结。 

      全文共分为五部分。绪论部分概括梳理辞例研究，包括其他领域的辞例 研究和有清以来的《毛诗》辞例研究，爬梳俞樾、刘师培、黄侃、黄焯等人 《毛诗》经传辞例研究的发展脉络，并提出论文目标。第二、三章对上述学 者的研究成果重新整理分类，将经例分为语言本体和非语言本体两大类，将 传例分为训释结构、训释位置、训释次序、训释目的、训释来源五大类。第 四章述评《毛诗》经传辞例应用研究，并探讨辞例应用的局限性。具体来看， 《毛诗》经例主要应用于解经，而对传例的深挖则可见出《毛传》的训释体 系。但在应用过程中，辞例会受到来自自身和言内语境的限制。末章总结全 文，反思此前辞例研究的弊端，并对其前景做出展望。

      The examples of diction are the laws of the canonical texts that people have compiled and summarized, and this work can be traced back to the earliest time in the pre-Qin Dynasty. Since the Qing Dynasty, scholars have paid much attention to the study of the examples of diction of Mao Shi and Mao Zhuan. They clarified the meaning of the poems and grasped the lineage system of the scriptures through the collation and application of the diction of the Mao Shi and Mao Zhuan. This paper discusses the collation and application research respectively, aiming at summarizing the achievements of the previous scholars.
      The text is divided into five parts. The introductory section provides an overview of the examples of diction studies, including those in other fields and those on Mao Shi, Mao Zhuan since the Qing Dynasty, crawling through the development of the examples of diction studies of Yu Yue, Liu Shipei, Huang Kan, Huang Zhuo, and others on Mao Shi and Mao Zhuan's diction, and proposing the goals of the dissertation. The second and third chapters reorganize and classify the research results of the above-mentioned scholars. Mao Shi’s examples are divided into two categories: linguistic ontology and non-linguistic ontology, and Mao Zhuan’s examples are divided into five major categories: structure of exegesis, location of exegesis, order of exegesis, purpose of exegesis, and source of exegesis. Chapter 4 reviews the research on the application of the examples of diction of the Mao Shi, Mao Zhuan and discusses the limitations of its application. Specifically, the examples of Mao Shi are mainly applied to the interpretation of the scriptures, while the deeper digging of the examples reveals the exegetical system of Mao Zhuan. However, in the process of application, the examples of diction are limited by their own and intra-verbal contexts. The final chapter summarizes the whole text, reflecting on the shortcomings of the previous examples of diction studies and giving an outlook on its future.