- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 人工智能生成物的著作权保护路径    

姓名:

 韦曼莉    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 中文    

学科代码:

 035101    

学科专业:

 法律(非法学)    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 法律硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2022    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 法学院    

研究方向:

 民商法    

第一导师姓名:

 韩赤风    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学法学院    

提交日期:

 2022-06-21    

答辩日期:

 2022-05-29    

外文题名:

 Study on the jurisdiction of foreign-related disputes over Chinese standard essedtial patents    

中文关键词:

 人工智能生成物 ; 独创性 ; 可著作权性 ; 著作权主体 ; 权利归属    

外文关键词:

 Artificial intelligence generated contents ; Original creation ; Work eligibility ; Copyright subject ; Right attribution    

中文摘要:
    人工智能技术在文学、艺术和科学领域的深度应用给人类社会带来了大量在外观上与人类作品并无区别的优秀内容,这些人工智能生成物不仅是社会精神文化的重要组成部分,还蕴含着一定经济价值。如果不对这类人工智能生成物进行有效保护,它们只能沦为公有资源被公众任意使用。这样一来,由于得不到有效鼓励,人工智能背后的利益主体对人工智能投入的积极性严重受挫。长此以往,这不仅对人工智能这一产业的良性运行不利,亦会阻碍社会文化的多样性发展。近年来,国内关于人工智能生成物法律保护的纠纷日渐浮出水面,我国司法实践在如何解决新时代智能技术与法律滞后性之间的矛盾上遭遇严重挑战,关于人工智能生成物保护的一些核心问题亟待厘清与解决。但是,鉴于人工智能生成物生成方式的特殊性,如何在现行著作权法下给予其有效保护变得非常棘手。人工智能生成物能否构成著作权法意义上的作品、肯定人工智能的创作主体地位是否会对传统的著作权主体理论造成冲击、人工智能生成物的权利归属如何确定、人工智能生成物著作权保护模式如何选择,这些都是在理论界和实务界产生较大争议并且亟需解决的问题。      
    本文首先对人工智能及人工智能生成物的概念进行了界定,并参考技术层面,根据人工智能的两种生成模式将人工智能生成物分为基于预设规则下的专家系统生成物与运用神经网络的机器学习生成物,加以分别讨论。在解读司法实践困境的基础之上,本文着重从生成物的作品适格性、著作权主体争议、对生成物进行著作权保护的成本与预期社会效果的比较分析三部分来研究著作权保护是否具有可行性。在论证可行性后,本文进一步提出了人工智能生成物著作权保护的具体路径设计,即以著作权法律体系为基础,对属于作品的人工智能生成物保护的主体、客体、具体的权利保护内容与保护期限作出适当限定,并对生成物的著作权归属与侵权责任进行安排,本文另外提议对未构成作品的生成物采取邻接权保护方案。最后,为更全面地保障人工智能生成物的著作权保护效果,更有效地规范人工智能生成物的文化市场,本文建议充分发挥政府主导作用并建立人工智能生成物的专门登记数据库。

外文摘要:
The in-depth application of artificial intelligence technology in the fields of literature, art and science has brought our human society a large amount of excellent contents that are indistinguishable from human works in appearance. These artificial intelligence generated contents are not only an important part of social spiritual culture, but also have certain economic value. If such artificial contents are not effectively protected, they will only be reduced to public resources for people to use arbitrarily. In this case, due to lack of incentives, the enthusiasm of the stakeholders behind artificial intelligence to invest will be severely frustrated. Over time, it will not only be detrimental to the healthy development of the artificial intelligence industry, but also affect the development of social and cultural diversity. In recent years, domestic disputes over the copyright protection of artificial intelligence contents have appeared and the domestic judicial practice has encountered serious challenges in how to solve the contradiction between intelligent technology and legal lag in the new era. The problem needs to be clarified and solved urgently. However, given the particularity of the way in which AI-generated contents are created, how to effectively protect them under the current copyright law has become extremely difficult. Whether artificial intelligence generated contents can be works in the sense of copyright law, whether affirming the creation subject status of artificial intelligence generated contents will cause damage to the traditional theory of copyright subjects, how to confirm the ownership of artificial intelligence generated contents, and how to choose the copyright protection mode of them, these are all the issues that have caused great controversy in the theoretical and practical circles and need to be solved urgently. This paper defines the concepts of artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence generated contents, and divide all the contents into expert system generated contents based on preset rules and machines learning generated contents by using neural networks according to two different modes of generation in the technical perspective to discuss separately. On the basis of analyzing the dilemma of domestic judicial practice, this paper focuses on the research on the feasibility of copyright protection of artificial intelligence generated contents from the perspective of its work eligibility, the disputes of its copyright subjects, the comparative analysis of the cost and expected social effects of copyright protection for artificial intelligence generated contents. After demonstrating the feasibility, this paper will further proposes a path for the copyright protection of these contents. More specifically, this paper will set some reasonable limits on the subject, object, specific rights protection contents and protection period of artificial intelligence generated contents which can be regarded as works based on the copyright legal system, and then make arrangements for the ownership of the copyright and infringement liability of the contents. In addition, the paper suggest that those contents which cannot be works should be protected by the neighboring rights. Finally, in order to safeguard the copyright protection of artificial intelligence contents and regulate the cultural market more effectively, this paper will propose to give full play to the leading role of the government and establish a special registration database for artificial intelligence contents.
参考文献总数:

 55    

馆藏号:

 硕035101/22057    

开放日期:

 2023-06-21    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式