章太炎作爲乾嘉小學的殿軍，在清末民初魏石經陸續出土的時代背景下，對三體石經進行了充分而全面的研究。其研究成果不僅在魏石經研究史上舉足輕重，對於與之相關的小學、經學、史學等領域也有着重要的貢獻。本文在窮盡地收集章太炎有關魏石經的全部論述及章太炎得見魏石經文字的全部情況的基礎上，詳細考察了章太炎對於魏石經的研究歷程與研究成果，分析其學術淵源與思想脈絡，總結提煉章氏在研究理念與研究實踐上的貢獻，並且客觀評價其不足之處，以求對章太炎圍繞魏石經建立的學術矩陣有更加深入的瞭解。
論文主要從六個方面展開討論：
第一章考察了章太炎《新出三體石經攷》的撰述背景與成書情況。清末光緒年間洛陽龍虎灘新出三體石經《君奭》殘石，1922年冬又於洛陽朱疙瘩村出土《尚書》、《春秋》殘石，章太炎先後從李根源、張鈁二人處獲贈殘石拓本，旋卽對石經作考證之語數千字，於1923年秋起在《華國》月刊上連載《新出三體石經考》。其後又在與吳承仕、黃侃等弟子的函來信往中進一步增修此作，俾黃侃、潘重規爲之謄清後，於1933年北上遊學時倩弟子錢玄同、吳承仕爲之校寫刊印，最終收入《章氏叢書續編》於1935年5月正式出版。《新出三體石經攷》一書前後不同版本增删修訂的變化，爲瞭解章太炎對魏石經認識的發展脈絡提供了研究基礎。
第二章考察了章太炎對與魏石經刊刻有關問題的認識。在強調東漢熹平所立乃一字石經，曹魏正始所立乃三字石經之後，章太炎進一步釐清了清人對曹魏黃初時曾有補刻三體石經的誤解，進而討論了三體石經當以經傳分立的形式刻有《尚書》、《春秋》及《左傳》三種文獻。章太炎又詳細考辨了邯鄲淳的生平事迹，指出石經刊刻的古文書丹及經本來源均爲邯鄲氏所傳。而對於魏石經行款碑數等問題，章氏的觀點前後經過了數次轉變，最後下結論認爲石經每行當有六十字，每面當有三十二行，本應有一百六十餘碑，然止於四十八碑，並未刻完。最後，章太炎對於魏石經的拓本與碎石關注頗多，其中“品字式”魏石經爲章氏所不信，體現出章氏在辨僞理惑方面的學術實踐。
第三章考察了章太炎對魏石經文字形體的分析成果。從文字時代先後來説，對於先秦銅器及石鼓材料，章氏對前者的態度相較於早年的懷疑與否定已經呈現出很明顯的改變，而相應地減少了對石鼓文的利用；對於秦漢文字，章太炎在《文始》與《新出三體石經攷》中一方面指出《説文》的正篆、古文與籀文與石經古文關係密切，相互之間旣可以參驗，亦可以别異，另一方面則重視秦碑小篆、漢碑隸書以及漢儒經注材料對於考釋石經古篆的重要性；對於傳抄古文，章太炎梳理了以《尚書》爲中心的隸古定傳抄脈絡，討論了敦煌本《尚書釋文》、薛季宣《書古文訓》、足利本《尚書》以及顔師古《匡謬正俗》與僞孔古文原本之間的複雜傳承關係，進一步利用《玉篇》、《集韻》、《汗簡》、《古文四聲韻》等傳抄古文材料考釋了諸多石經古文。此外，章氏還在魏石經文字的研究實踐中，充分闡釋了筆勢理論與石經古篆的構形系統，體現了章太炎對文字形體的構形構意的深入剖析。最後，以對石經書體特點的認識及對石經文字形體深刻理解爲基礎，章太炎進一步重視了石經文字在書法創作上的價值。
第四章考察了章太炎魏石經研究對音義系統的利用。章太炎在以《説文》爲基礎的形義系統的基礎上，進一步系聯起語言的音義，以小學的五級研究法爲綱領建立了對音義系統的理性認識。而在研究魏石經的過程中，章太炎在利用詞彙意義與詞源意義的系統分析字意、利用古音系統從諧聲偏旁、文獻異文以及輾轉相求三個角度分析字音、利用音義系統分析“意相引申”、“原有本字”、“本無正字”的字用三個方面實踐頗豐。
第五章考察了章太炎利用魏石經疏通經典文獻的成果。首先體現在章太炎察覺了石經篆隸反映了漢魏古文家的師讀，其中《尚書》師讀多與馬融相合，而《春秋》師讀則存在一定的傳古文者據公羊、穀梁二家改易經文的現象，章氏進而對古文家所傳經本形態的問題提出了自己的設想，認爲當由“古文摹寫”、“隸寫訓讀”、“傳注講解”三個部分組成。其次在於利用新出魏石經材料，一方面對清代以降出現的異説提出批評，另一方面又自立新説，利用字用現象與字形特點考釋相關經典文獻。但章太炎並非一味求新求奇，他晚年更重要的學術轉向是在見到真正的魏石經古文之後，開始反思清代漢學家的研究本質，從而一定程度上提倡要維護僞孔傳對經典的舊解，並且努力去貫通太史公《史記》所存《尚書》舊説與石經古文的關係。
第六章總結論述了章太炎魏石經研究對於學術界的貢獻與侷限。章太炎的魏石經研究貫徹了對新材料與新説積極而謹慎的研究態度，強調了小學、經學、史學三者互動的研究方法，貢獻了極具啓發意義的研究理念。而在筆勢筆意學説、漢字構形系統、傳抄古文脈絡、出土文獻與傳世文獻對讀、古文家所傳經本形態、邯鄲淳生平等問題上的研究實踐，則直接或間接影響了後人的研究，對於今天的學術研究仍有重要的啓示作用。另一方面，章太炎自身理論體系的不完善以及時代的侷限，也造成了其研究在構形構意、文獻詞義、行款排列等方面微觀考證的失誤，值得我們在立體而客觀地認識章太炎魏石經研究的過程中予以重視。

Zhang Taiyan, as the runner-up of Qianjia philology, under the background of the unearthed Wei Shijing in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, conducted a full and comprehensive study of the stone scripture in 3 scripts. His research results not only play a pivotal role in the history of Wei Shijing research, but also make important contributions to related fields such as philology, scholasticism, and history. Based on the exhaustive collection of Zhang Taiyan's expositions on the Wei Shijing and Zhang Taiyan's access to all the scripts of the Wei Shijing, this paper examines Zhang Taiyan's research process and research results on the Wei Shijing in detail, analyzes its academic origins and ideological context, and summarizes Zhang Taiyan's contributions in research concepts and research practices on the Wei Shijing, and objectively evaluate their shortcomings, in order to have a deeper understanding of the academic matrix established by Zhang Taiyan around Wei Shijing.
The paper mainly discusses six aspects:
The first chapter investigates the writing background and the completion of Zhang Taiyan's "Xinchu Santi Shijing Kao". During the Guangxu period of the late Qing Dynasty, the stone scripture in 3 scripts of "Jun Shi" was newly unearthed in Luoyang Longhutan. In the winter of 1922, the "Shangshu" and "Spring and Autumn" were unearthed in Zhugeda Village, Luoyang. Zhang Taiyan was successively given a rubbing copy of the remnant stone from Li Genyuan and Zhang Fang, and wrote thousands of characters of textual research on the stone scriptures. Since the autumn of 1923, he serialized the "Xinchu Santi Shijing Kao" in the "Hua Guo" monthly magazine. Later, in the letters with Wu Chengshi, Huang Kan and other disciples, this work was further revised. After Huang Kan and Pan Chonggui transcribed it, Zhang Taiyan asked Qian Xuantong and Wu Chengshi, his disciples, to help him writing and printing this book during his lecture in the north in 1933. This book was finally included in the "Sequel to Zhang's Series", which was officially published in May 1935. The changes of additions, deletions and revisions in different editions of "Xinchu Santi Shijing Kao" provide a research basis for understanding the development of Zhang Taiyan's understanding of the Wei Shijing.
The second chapter investigates Zhang Taiyan's understanding of the issues related to the engraving of Wei Shijing. After emphasizing that Xiping Shijing established in the Eastern Han Dynasty had 1 script, and Zhengshi Shijing established in the Cao Wei Dynasty had 3 scripts, Zhang Taiyan further clarified the misunderstanding of the Qing people that the period named Huangchu in the Cao Wei Dynasty had supplemented the stone scripture in 3 scripts, and then discussed the stone scripture in 3 scripts should be engraved with three kinds of documents, "Shangshu", "Spring and Autumn" and "Zuo Zhuan" in the form of separate scriptures. Zhang Taiyan also examined and identified the life stories of Handan Chun in detail, and pointed out that the sources of the ancient writings and scriptures engraved in the Shijing were all passed down by the Handan clan. Regarding issues such as the number of inscriptions and monuments of Wei Shijing, Zhang's views changed several times before and after, and finally came to the conclusion that each line of Shijing should have sixty characters, and each side should have thirty-two lines, which should have one hundred and sixty monuments. The remaining monuments, however, stopped at the number of forty-eight, and the carvings were not finished. Finally, Zhang Taiyan paid a lot of attention to the rubbings and rubbles of Wei Shijing. Among them, the "pin" style Wei Shijing was not believed by Zhang, which reflected Zhang's academic practice in distinguishing falsehoods and sorting out confusions.
The third chapter investigates Zhang Taiyan's analysis results of Wei Shijing's characters. In terms of the writing age, Zhang's attitude towards the pre-Qin bronzes and stone drum materials has changed significantly compared with his doubts and denials in the early years, and the use of stone drum writing has been reduced accordingly; Regarding issues as characters of Qin and Han Dynasty, On the one hand, Zhang Taiyan pointed out in "Wen Shi" and "Xinchu Santi Shijing Kao" that the sealed script, ancient script and "Zhou" script of "Shuowen" are closely related to the ancient script of Shijing, and they can be identified or distinguished from each other. On the other hand, he pays attention to the importance of the small seal script on the Qin monument, the official script on the Han monument, and the annotation materials of Han Dynasty in the study of the ancient script of the stone scriptures; Regarding issues as copying ancient scripts, Zhang Taiyan discussed the complex inheritance relationship between the Dunhuang version of "Shangshu Shiwen", Xue Jixuan's "Shu Guwen Xun", Ashikaga version of "Shangshu", and Yan Shigu's "Kuangmu Zhengsu" and the original pseudo-Kong ancient texts, and further used "Yu Pian", "Ji Yun", "Han Jian", "Guwen Sishengyun" and other copying ancient scripts materials to examine and explain many ancient scripts of stone scriptures. In addition, in the research and practice of Wei Shijing characters, Zhang Shi fully explained the "Bi Shi" theory and the character configuration system of the ancient scripts of Shijing, reflecting Zhang Taiyan's in-depth analysis of the character configuration and the configurational meaning of characters. Finally, based on the recognition of the characteristics of the stone scriptures and the profound understanding of the stone scriptures, Zhang Taiyan further paid attention to the value of the stone scriptures in calligraphy creation.
The fourth chapter examines how Zhang Taiyan used the sound-meaning system in Wei Shijing's research. On the basis of the form and meaning system based on "Shuowen", Zhang Taiyan further connected the sound and meaning of language, and established a rational understanding of the sound and meaning system based on the five-level research method of philology. In the process of researching Wei Shijing, Zhang Taiyan used the word meaning and etymological meaning to systematically analyze the configurational meaning of characters, used the ancient phonetic system to analyze the sound of characters from three perspectives, including phonetic symbols, different texts of documents, and complicated study methods, and used the phonetic and semantic system to analyze the meaning extension, original characters and unknown proper characters, which concluded quite abundant work.
The fifth chapter investigates Zhang Taiyan's achievements in using Wei Shijing to clear the classical literature. First of all, it is reflected in Zhang Taiyan's perception that the stone scriptures' seal and official scripts reflect the master reading of ancient-script teachers in the Han and Wei Dynasties. Among them, the master reading of "Shangshu" was mostly combined with Ma Rong, while a certain number of the master reading of "Spring and Autumn" had been changed according to Gongyang and Guliang masters. Zhang further proposed his own assumptions about the form of the scripts passed down by the ancient-script masters, which contained three parts, including ancient scripts writing, official scripts reading and ancient-script masters' explanation. The second is to use the newly published materials of Wei Shijing, on the one hand, he criticized the different theories that appeared since the Qing Dynasty, and on the other hand, he created new theories on his own, and used the characters' using phenomenon and shape of characters to examine and interpret relevant classic literature. But Zhang Taiyan did not just seek novelty, his more important academic turn in his later years was to reflect on the research nature of "Han Xue" masters in Qing Dynasty after seeing the real ancient texts of Wei Shijing. He also tried to protect the old interprets of "Shangshu" and understand the relationship between Taishigong' "Shi Ji" and ancient texts of Shijing.
The sixth chapter summarizes the contribution and limitation of Zhang Taiyan's research on Wei Shijing to academia. Zhang Taiyan's research on Wei Shijing implements a positive and cautious research attitude towards new materials and new theories, emphasize the interactive research methods of philology, scholasticism, and history, contributing highly inspiring research ideas. And his research practices, including the theory of "Bi Shi" and "Bi Yi", the system of Chinese character configuration, the context of copying ancient scripts, the comparing readings of unearthed documents and handed down documents, the form of scripts passed on by ancient-script masters, and the issue of Handan Chun's life story, have directly or indirectly affected the research of later generations, still having important implications for today's academic research. On the other hand, the imperfection of Zhang Taiyan's own theoretical system and the limitations of the times have also caused mistakes in micro-textual research in terms of character configuration and its meaning, classical literature's meaning, and arrangement of monuments, which are is worthy of our attention in the process of understanding Zhang Taiyan's Wei Shijing study in a three-dimensional and objective way.