绝大多数人每天都需要通勤，随着城市规模不断扩大，通勤时间与距离也在不断增加，通勤在人们生活中的时间占比越来越多，它对于个人、企业和社会也变得更重要了。虽然国家在大力发展基础建设，提高通勤效率，改善通勤体验，但由于各种原因，忍受长时间通勤，以及体会充满拥挤、异味、噪音的通勤过程，仍可能是许多人不得不面临的重要问题。个体在通勤过程中的体验对其通勤情绪的影响，以及通勤情绪是否会影响个体到达工作场时自我调节能力这一现象应得到关注。

本研究采用探索性时序混合研究方法，旨在探索个体在通勤中的体验对随后通勤情绪的作用，以及这种情绪对于其工作中自我调节能力的影响。

研究一为通勤体验量表的编制。通过半结构化访谈法，访谈了8名不同类型的通勤者，以质性研究的访谈内容为主，整理出通勤体验的结构。根据提出的结构和编码的结果，编写初版通勤体验量表的题目。使用预测试收集的248份问卷，对量表的结构和题目进行筛选优化，最终保留18道题目，分为通勤途中环境、通勤阻碍及通勤时间效率三个维度。正式测试收集了243份问卷，用于检验量表的质量。结果表明，通勤体验量表三维结构比较稳定，通勤途中环境维度的信度为0.896、通勤阻碍维度的信度为0.840、通勤时间效率维度的信度为0.794，总量表信度为0.909，内部一致性良好。对其结构效度采用验证性因素分析，结果为：X²/df =2.187，RMSEA =0.070，CFI =0.926，TLI =0.914，表明量表具有良好的结构效度。

研究二主要研究的是各个变量之间的相互作用关系及机制。采用研究一自编的通勤体验量表，以溢出理论、资源保存理论、自我调节理论为依据，用问卷测查了全国243名通勤者的通勤体验、通勤情绪和他们随后工作中自我调节能力。结果表明：通勤体验中的通勤时间效率、通勤途中环境对于个体的通勤情绪影响最大；弹性工作计划不能调节通勤体验与通勤情绪之间的关系；积极、中立和消极不同的通勤情绪个体，其工作中的自我调节能力有显著差异。通勤情绪在通勤体验与自我调节能力中起中介作用。

整个研究表明，自编的通勤体验量表信效度良好，可推广应用。在通勤活动中，个体的通勤体验越好，其通勤情绪也会越积极，当他们到达工作场所时，情绪体验积极的个体在工作中的自我调节能力明显比消极情绪的个体要高。研究结论对于政府/组织提升个体的通勤体验和通勤情绪有一定指导价值。

The commute has become an essential part of the majority of folks. Commuting time and distance are increasing in tandem with the continued expansion of cities. Commuting time is gradually rising, becoming increasingly significant for individuals, businesses, and society. Despite that, the country is working hard to improve infrastructure, transportation efficiency, and commuter experience. The challenge of long commutes and commuting in a crowded environment with strange smells and noise may, however, continue to be significant issues for many people due to various factors. The impact of individuals' commuting experiences on their commuting emotions, and whether commuting emotions will affect their self–regulation ability when they get to work, should be considered.

This study examines the effect of commuting experience on subsequent commuting emotion and self–regulation capacity at work via an exploratory time series hybrid technique.

The first study is establishing a scale to assess the commuter experience. Eight distinct types of commuters were interviewed in a semi–structured interview method, and the structure of the commuting experience was deduced from the interview material of qualitative research. The first edition of the Commuting Experience Scale is compiled through the proposed structure and coding findings. The scale's structure and themes were screened and optimized in virtue of 248 pretest questions. Finally, 18 topics were maintained, grouped into three dimensions: commuting environment, commuting difficulties, and commuting time efficiency. The formal test collected 243 questionnaires to evaluate the scale's quality. It concluded that the three–dimensional structure of the commuting experience scale is relatively stable, with reliability of 0.896 for the commuting environment dimension, 0.840 for the commuting obstruction dimension, 0.794 for the commuting time efficiency dimension, and 0.909 for the total scale, presenting an excellent internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis was adopted to determine the scale's structure validity with the following values: X²/df = 2.187, RMSEA = 0.070, CFI = 0.926 and TLI = 0.914, indicating that the scale possessed adequate structure validity.

The second study is primarily concerned with the interaction and mechanism of several variables. The commuting experience, commuting emotion, and self–regulation ability in work of 243 commuters in China was evaluated via a self–designed commuting experience measure in the first study based on the spillover theory, resource conservation theory and self–regulation theory. The findings indicate that commuting time efficiency and the commuting environment have the greatest impact on individual commuting emotion; a flexible work arrangement cannot alter the relationship between commuting experience and commuting emotion; and there are significant differences in self–regulation ability in the workplace between individuals with positive, neutral, and negative commuting emotions. Commuting emotion acts as a bridge between the commuting experience and the self–regulation ability.

In summary, the study demonstrates that the self–designed commuting experience scale is reliable and valid, and can be promoted and utilized. In commuting activities, the more positive an individual's commuting experience, the more positive their commuting feelings will be. When persons with favorable emotional experiences at work arrive at the office, their self–regulation ability is greater than those with negative commuting emotions. The research conclusion has certain guiding value for the government or organization to improve individual commuting experience and commuting emotion.