- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 法律职业伦理与职业纪律之关系考辨 ——以检察官为职业主体范例的考察    

姓名:

 魏烨爽    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 035101    

学科专业:

 法律(非法学)    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 法律硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2023    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 法学院    

研究方向:

 刑事诉讼法    

第一导师姓名:

 印波    

第一导师单位:

  法学院    

提交日期:

 2023-11-22    

答辩日期:

 2023-05-25    

外文题名:

 A Study on the Relationship between Legal Professional Ethics and Professional Discipline ——A Study on the Example of Prosecutors as Professional Subjects    

中文关键词:

 职业伦理 ; 职业纪律 ; 检察官职业伦理 ; 模式构建    

外文关键词:

 Professional ethics ; Professional discipline ; Professional ethics of prosecutors ; Pattern construction    

中文摘要:

法律职业伦理的作用是对法律职业团体的成员提出一定的道德要求,以此来维系法律职业团体的声誉,并在此基础上维持法律职业团体的正常运行。

法律职业纪律是我国特有的纪律性规定,是我国法律职业伦理和司法规制制度的重要组成部分。以检察官为例,探讨检察官法律职业伦理和法律职业纪律的关系,审视和完善法律职业伦理规定是建设检察机关的需要。它既关系着检察官检察职能的履行,同时也关系着法律公平正义的维护和法治国家的建设发展。

第一章与第二章主要是论述了法律职业伦理以及法律职业纪律的概念、特征、作用和原理机制,这是讨论两者关系的前提。法律职业纪律是法律职业伦理的重要组成部分,但是法律职业纪律还有着其很多自身的特点。法律职业伦理主要依靠主观能动性来实现,而法律职业纪律主要依靠外部惩戒性得以实施。

第三章探讨了检察官法律职业伦理和法律职业纪律的关系。论文介绍了检察官群体的特点,突出分析检察官职业伦理特点,认为其有更强的责任感和政治性等特征。同时对检察官职业纪律进行细致分析,列出其特点与核心价值。同时从理论层面、规则层面和实证层面进行分别讨论,认为法律职业伦理和职业纪律在这三个层面都有着密切的联系。第三章还介绍了检察官法律职业伦理与职业纪律关系应用的现状。检察官法律职业伦理和职业纪律应用的模式,包括检察官法律职业伦理道德解释模式、规范实证解释模式,及规范实证解释模式下的法律职业伦理惩戒中心化模式。介绍了不同模式的概念和在应用中存在的问题。

第四章对我国检察官法律职业伦理和法律职业纪律关系的建设提出思路,即建立全新的模式——法律职业伦理统摄模式。结合前文所述的法律职业伦理各种模式的阐述,法律职业伦理的统摄模式可以解决现实中法律职业伦理在理论和实践中的不足。同时,法律职业伦理的统摄模式是具有可构建性和可应用性的。法律职业伦理的统摄模式具有逻辑思维的自洽性、规则范畴的体系性和司法规律的符合性。法律职业伦理的统摄模式是理论层面的创新,为现实中检察官法律职业伦理建设提供新方法,为我国培养合格的检察官提供新方案。

外文摘要:

The ethics of the legal profession is very important for the development of the legal profession, as it nurtures a sense of professional honor and disgrace, which in turn develops into deterministic ethical norms and a inherited professional culture, maintaining the social status and reputation of legal professional groups and their members.

Legal professional discipline is a unique disciplinary provision in China, and is an important component of China's legal professional ethics and judicial regulation system. Taking prosecutors as an example, exploring the relationship between legal professional ethics and legal professional discipline of prosecutors, and examining and improving the provisions of legal professional ethics are necessary for the construction of procuratorial organs. It is not only related to the performance of the procuratorial functions of prosecutors, but also to the maintenance of legal fairness and justice and the construction and development of a rule of law country.

The first and second chapters examine and demonstrate the concepts, characteristics, functions, and principles of legal professional ethics and legal professional discipline, which are prerequisites for discussing the relationship between the two. Legal professional discipline is an important component of legal professional ethics, but it also has many of its own characteristics. Legal professional ethics mainly relies on subjective initiative to achieve, while legal professional discipline mainly relies on external disciplinary measures to implement.

Chapter 3 explores the relationship between the legal professional ethics and legal professional discipline of prosecutors. The paper introduces the characteristics of the prosecutor community, highlights the analysis of the professional ethics characteristics of prosecutors, and believes that they have stronger sense of responsibility and political characteristics. At the same time, a detailed analysis is conducted on the professional discipline of prosecutors, listing its characteristics and core values. At the same time, it is discussed separately from the theoretical, rule-based, and empirical levels, and it is believed that legal professional ethics and professional discipline are closely related at these three levels. Chapter 3 also introduces the current situation of the application of the relationship between legal professional ethics and professional discipline of prosecutors. The application models of legal professional ethics and professional discipline for prosecutors include the interpretation model of legal professional ethics and ethics for prosecutors, the normative empirical interpretation model, and the centralized punishment model of legal professional ethics under the normative empirical interpretation model. Introduced the concepts of different patterns and the problems that exist in their applications.

Chapter 4 proposes the idea of improving the construction of legal professional ethics and discipline for prosecutors in China, which is to establish a new model - the legal professional ethics governance model. Combining the various models of legal professional ethics mentioned earlier, the integrated model of legal professional ethics can solve the shortcomings of legal professional ethics in theory and practice in reality. At the same time, the governance model of legal professional ethics is constructible and applicable. The governing mode of legal professional ethics has the consistency of logical thinking, the systematic nature of rule categories, and the consistency of judicial laws. The governance model of legal professional ethics is an innovation at the theoretical level, providing new methods for the construction of legal professional ethics for prosecutors in reality and providing new solutions for cultivating qualified prosecutors in China.

参考文献总数:

 64    

馆藏号:

 硕035101/23142    

开放日期:

 2024-11-30    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式