本文旨在研究国际商事仲裁中紧急仲裁员决定的可执行性问题。在传统的商事仲裁程序中，当事人对临时措施提出申请后，需要经过仲裁机构规定的审查程序，往往需要很长时间，从而损害了仲裁程序的效率和实用性。为了解决这一问题，紧急仲裁员制度从司法实践中逐渐诞生，目的是在紧急情况下为当事人提供快速、有效的救济措施。然而，实践中，由于缺乏相关国家法律的支持和国际承认机制的不完善，这些决定在执行上面临困难。本文通过研究紧急仲裁员的法律地位从而将紧急仲裁员决定的执行与仲裁庭发布的临时措施进行对比分析，探讨了紧急仲裁员决定的可执行性问题。

The purpose of this article is to explore the enforceability of an emergency arbitrators’ decision in international commercial arbitration. In traditional commercial arbitration procedures, after a party applies for interim measures, it needs to go through the review procedures prescribed by the arbitration institution, which often takes a long time, thus undermining the efficiency and practicality of the arbitration procedure. In order to solve this problem, the emergency arbitrator system has gradually emerged from judicial practice, with the aim of providing parties with rapid and effective relief measures in emergency situations. However, in practice, these decisions face difficulties in implementation due to the lack of support from relevant national laws and the imperfection of international recognition mechanisms. This paper discusses the enforceability of emergency arbitrator decisions by studying the legal status of emergency arbitrators, thereby comparing and analyzing the enforcement of emergency arbitrators’ decisions with interim measures issued by the arbitral tribunal.