春秋时期周王室的衰落与其内部频繁发生的内乱事件息息相关。本文首先考察了作为春秋时期王室内乱发端的周幽王废嫡立庶事件，通过辨析清华简《系年》“周亡王九年”句的释义，厘清了此次内乱的过程，并分析了内乱各阶段中参与者的组成，认为诸侯国在此次内乱中对王室继承问题的插手深刻影响了春秋时期王室内乱时周王的应对举措。继而，本文就春秋时期的五次王室内乱中叛乱方与平乱方的人员构成、叛乱动机及诸次内乱的性质进行了史事疏证，特别指出了王子带之乱与王子朝之乱存在前、后期性质的变化，总结出在春秋前期，王子叛乱多依靠先王为其留下的政治力量，而发展至春秋后期，周室卿族逐渐崛起，成为王室内乱中的主导势力，先王的政治影响则趋于衰微。与此同时，王室在处理内部事务时对诸侯国的依赖性愈发增强，相比之下，诸侯国勤王的态度则渐趋消极，王室的政治价值日益下降。本文的第三部分就王子带之乱与儋翩之乱进行了专题讨论，认为王子带之乱突出体现了春秋时期中原国家与戎狄群体交往的态度及策略，是该时期夷夏关系的典型表现；而儋翩之乱作为春秋后期郑国外交策略转变的重要节点，则鲜明地反映了该阶段周王室政治地位的下跌。

The decline of the Zhou Dynasty in the Spring and Autumn period is closely related to the frequent internal strives of the Zhou heirs. In this paper, we first discuss the incident of King You abolishing Prince YiJiu by replacing with younger son BoPan as his heir. This is the first struggle between royal princes in the Spring and Autumn period. By analyzing the "Zhou wang wang jiu nian周亡王九年(Zhou remained without King for nine years )" in Tsinghua Bamboo Slips Xi Nian, clarifying the process of this disturbances as well as the composition of the participants at different time periods, we conclude that the intervention of States deeply affected the King's response to the royal disturbances of inheritance in the Spring and Autumn Period. The second chapter discusses the five times of royal internal turmoil during the Spring and Autumn period on aspects such as the composition of the rebels and the suppressors, the motives and nature of each turmoil. In the rebellions of Prince Dai(王子带) and Prince Chao(王子朝), the nature of the pre- and post-insurgency has changed. In the early Spring and Autumn period a prince's rebellion mostly relied on the political power left by the former King, which become unsignificant in later Spring and Autumn period when Noble families gradually emerged as the dominant forces. At the same time, the royal family’s reliance on the States was increasingly strengthened when dealing with internal affairs. In contrast, the attitude of the Dukes of States serving the King has become negative, all indicates the declining of the political value of the Zhou royal family. The third chapter focused on the rebellion of Prince Dai（王子带）and DanPian（儋翩）. The rebellion of Prince Dai prominently reflects the attitudes and strategies of Hua ethnic group associated with Rong（戎）、Di（狄）ethnic group in the Spring and Autumn period, which is the typical manifestation of the relationship between the Yi and the Xia in this period. The rebellion of DanPian is an important node of the transformation of State Zheng’s diplomacy in the late Spring and Autumn period, and clearly reflects the decline in the political status of the Zhou royal family.