For foreign-related divorce,it’s particularly important to determine whether the court has jurisdiction. For the same foreign-related divorce case,the court in different country may apply different law ,therefore,it leads to different results.So,the clear legislation about jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case is of prime importance.However,there are two aspects of Chinese legislation about jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case which should be improved.

The first chapter will list articles of Chinese law about rules on jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case.The clear articles will provide basis to analyze the legislative shortage. 

The second chapter will discuss two important problems about legislation about jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case in China. On the one hand,there is no rules on jurisdiction for some kinds of foreign-related cases,Chinese courts have no right to hear the case even if it’s more appropriate for Chinese court;On the other hand,it’s less flexible on the rules about multiplicity of proceedings,it may easily cause infliction of jurisdiction between different countries.Of course,the legislative problems on jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case proceed from the fact that the concept of legislation about jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case is out of times.

The third chapter will further explain the legislative shortages by analyzing several true foreign-related divorce cases.By comparing the theoretical analysis with the true cases in trial,it will be more reliable to argue the shortage of legislation about jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case.

The forth chapter will provide some advice to deal with the problems mentioned,and the feasibility of agreed jurisdiction and forum-non-convenience-doctrine in jurisdiction of foreign-related divorce case will be analyzed.