本文采用文献法和空间集成分析法对中国全新世暖期（6.5-5.5kaBP）降水格局进行了完整定量复原，同时对张兰生先生（1980）复原出的中国盛冰期（22-16kaBP）降水格局进行了验证和修订。空间集成分析主要的依据是季风气候控制下全国降水在空间上总体的分布规律以及自然环境变化的协同性原理。通过中国全新世暖期和盛冰期降水格局与现代（1951-1980）降水格局的对比，得出以下结论：(1) 全新世暖期全国降水量普遍高于现代。具体而言，长江中下游地区年降水量比现代高约250-300mm，约相当于现代的115%-125%；秦岭-淮河一线附近年降水量比现代高约200mm，约相当于现代的125%；黄河流域年降水量高于现代约100-150mm；约相当于现代的120%-150%；东北地区由西往东年降水量从高于现代约100mm递减为50mm左右，相对增幅由约125%递减为110%左右；西北地区年降水量与现代差值不足100mm，约相当于现代的150%-250%；青藏高原绝大部分地区年降水量高于现代约100-150mm，约相当于现代的120%-200%。(2) 盛冰期全国降水量普遍低于现代。具体而言，长江中下游及其以南地区年降水量比现代低约500-800mm，约相当于现代的40%-70%；秦岭-淮河一线附近年降水量比现代低约400-500mm，约相当于现代的40%-45%；黄河流域内陆部分年降水量低于现代约100-200mm，约相当于现代的50%-70%，而沿海部分则约为200-400mm，约相当于现代的45%-50%；东北地区由东南向西北年降水量从低于现代约400mm递减为150mm左右，约相当于现代的50%-60%；西北地区除天山西部年降水量低于现代约50mm外，其余地区基本没有变化，约相当于现代的80%-100%；青藏高原自东南向西北降水从低于现代约400mm递减为50mm左右，约相当于现代的40%-80%。(3)与张兰生先生（1980）重建的盛冰期降水结果相比，本文所得出的降水复原结果在华北地区和西北地区与张先生结果一致；在黄河上游地区和青藏高原地区比张先生的结果高约100-150mm；在东北地区高约150-200mm；在江南一带则低约200-400mm。

The paper quantitatively reconstructed the precipitation of China in the Holocene Megathermal (6.5-5.5kaBP) by using literature method and spatial synthesis analysis method. Meanwhile, the paper verified and calibrated the precipitation of China in the Last Glacial Maximum (22-16kaBP), which was reconstructed by Zhang Lansheng (1980). The principle of spatial synthesis analysis was based on the spatial trend consistency of China’ precipitation controlled by monsoon climate and the coordination of natural environment change. To compare the precipitation of the Holocene Megathermal and the precipitation of the Last Glacial Maximum with that of today (1951-1980) in China, we got conclusions as follows: (1) The annual precipitation of China in the Holocene Megathermal were popularly higher than today. Practically speaking, the annual precipitation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River was higher than today by about 200-250mm, and about 115%-125% of today; in the Qinling-Huaihe area about 200mm, and about 125% of today; in the Yellow River basin about 100-150mm, and about 120%-150% of today; in Northeast China from about 100mm in the west to about 50mm in the east, and about 125% of today in the west to about 110% in the east; in Northwest China less than 100mm, and about 150%-250% of today; in most regions of the Qing-Tibet Plateau about 100-150mm, and about 120%-200% of today. (2) The annual precipitation of China in the Glacial Maximum were popularly lower than today. Practically speaking, the annual precipitation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and the regions south to it was lower than today by about 500-800mm, and about 40%-70% of today; in Qinling-Huaihe area about 400-500mm, and about 40%-45% of today; in the Yellow River basin about 100-200mm in the inland and about 200-400mm in the coastal area, and about 45%-70% of today; in Northeast China from about 400mm in the southeast to about 150mm in the northwest, and about 50%-60% of today; in Northwest China less than 50mm, and about 80%-100% of today; in the Qing-Tibet Plateau from about 400mm in the southeast to about 50mm in the northwest, and about 40%-80% of today. (3) To compare of the reconstruction of annual precipitation in the Last Glacial Maximum by Zhang Lansheng(1980), the result in this paper matched well with Zhang’s result in North China and Northwest China; the annual precipitation in the upper reaches of the Yellow River and the Qing-Tibet Plateau was higher than Zhang’ result by about 100-150mm, in Northeast China was higher about 150-200mm; but in the regions south to the lower reaches of the Yangtze River was lower by about 200-400mm.