《蒼頡篇》是我國較早的識字課本，是古代重要的小學文獻，可惜早已亡佚。近年來，随着大量出土文献的問世，《蒼頡篇》終得重見天日。而北大漢簡《蒼頡篇》（以下簡稱“北大本”）的整理出版，讓我們得以窺見《蒼頡篇》的早期面貌。作為《蒼頡篇》的最早抄本之一，“北大本”保存的文字最多，且字跡清晰，是目前最有價值的本子。但《蒼頡篇》文本艱深，釋讀難度很大。因此，相關的研究十分有限，這為我們較深入的探討留下了空間。論文選取“北大本”為研究對象，并利用其他出土的《蒼頡篇》材料，對該書作全面的整理釋讀，以期推動《蒼頡篇》的研究。

論文包括兩個部分。第一章主要是總結北大漢簡《蒼頡篇》的研究現狀、文本特點及研究前景。其中，研究現狀包括版本研究、竹簡編連、書法研究、文本考釋、詞彙語法研究等方面，我們全面歸納了這些方面的研究現狀，並揭示出當前研究中存在的問題。當前對《蒼頡篇》文本特點認識不足，部分原因是由於整理者的注釋不夠準確到位，而後續的一些研究者任意改讀、破讀，隨意通假,缺少對整句整篇文本的關照。我們對這些問題作了較全面的分析總結，重視運用比較互證法和義素分析法來考釋詞義。

第二章為“北大漢簡《蒼頡篇》補釋”，是論文的主體部分。具體包括兩方面的工作：其一，分析總結前人研究的得失，尤其是對有爭議的觀點詳加討論，對訓釋不充分的地方進行補充,這部分內容既涉及補正竹簡整理者的疏失，又有對其他研究者觀點的駁正。其二，也是最重要的，根據訓詁材料和文獻用例，對簡文的釋讀提出自己的觀點，並對之展開詳細論證。如簡20“?據??等”，簡30“汁洎流敗”，簡43“?椅姘觟”等條目的考釋。在研究的過程中，綜合運用二重證據法、比較互證法、義素分析法等方法，反復考論詞義，梳理詞與詞之間的關係。對難以理解的文句，做整支簡的釋讀。

Cang Jie Pian is an earlier textbook for literacy in China and one of the important ancient Chinese Philology literatures. Unfortunately, it has long since died. In recent years, a large number of excavations and discoveries in the material of Cangjie Pianhave made it possible to see the sky again. The collation and publication of the Han Dynasty Bamboo Slip "Cang Jie Pian" (hereinafter referred to as "Peking University Version") of Peking University gives us a glimpse into the early appearance of "Cang Jie Pian". As one of the earliest manuscripts of "Cang Jie Pian", "Peking University Version" has the most preserved text and clear handwriting, and is currently the most valuable book. However, the text "Cang Jie Pian" is difficult and difficult to interpret. Therefore, the related research is very limited, which leaves room for our in-depth discussion. The thesis selected "Peking University" as the research object, and used other unearthed "Cang Jie Pian" materials to make a comprehensive interpretation of the book in order to promote the research of "Cang Jie Pian".

The thesis includes two parts. The first chapter is mainly to summarize the research status, text characteristics and research prospects of Peking University Han Bamboo Slips. Among them, the research status includes version research, bamboo book compilation, calligraphy research, textual interpretation, vocabulary grammar research and other aspects. We have comprehensively summarized the research status of these aspects and revealed the problems in the current research. The current lack of understanding of the characteristics of the text "Cang Jie Pian" is partly due to the fact that the organizer's notes are not accurate enough, and some subsequent researchers have arbitrarily revised and broken through the readings, and they are free to pass the fake. We have made a more comprehensive analysis and summary of these issues, paying attention to the use of comparative mutual evidence method and sememe analysis method to interpret the meaning of words.

The second chapter is "Supplementary Interpretation of Cang Jie Pian" by Han Dynasty, which is the main part of the thesis. It includes two aspects of work: First, it analyzes and summarizes the gains and losses of previous studies, especially discusses the controversial views in detail, and supplements the inadequate interpretation. This part involves both correcting the negligence of the bamboo slip organizers There are also rebuttals of other researchers' views. The second, and most important, based on the exegetical materials and literature use cases, put forward your own views on the interpretation of the bamboo slips and carry out detailed argumentation. For example, the interpretations of No. 20 "?據??等", No. 30 "汁洎流敗", No. 43 "?椅姘觟", etc. are relatively reliable. In the process of research, the method of double evidence, comparison and mutual proof, and sememe analysis are used comprehensively to repeatedly discuss the meaning of words and sort out the relationship between words. Make a simple interpretation of difficult sentences. .

This article comprehensively and systematically studies the text of Peking University's "Cang Jie Pian" by comprehensively using the theoretical methods of philology, exegesis, etymology and other disciplines. On the basis of the research of the former sages and present people, I put forward my personal opinion, hoping to be helpful to the research of "Cang Jie Pian".