本研究探讨了父、母对高中生消极情绪的反应方式与高中生情绪调节方式、人际亲密能力三者之间的关系。采用问卷调查法，以504名高二学生为被试，运用结构方程的统计方法，研究了三种情绪——悲伤、害怕、生气——条件下，三个变量之间的关系。主要研究结果如下：1. 男生在三种消极情绪条件下都更压抑。2. 女生的人际亲密能力高于男生。3. 父、母对女生的消极情绪更自主支持，对男生的消极情绪更条件关注。4. 不同的情绪条件下，男生的模型不同；不同的情绪条件下，女生的模型不同；同种情绪条件下，男、女生的模型不同。5. 父、母对孩子消极情绪的反应方式与孩子的情绪调节方式间的关系存在相互作用。意思是说，父、母对孩子消极情绪的反应方式会影响孩子的情绪调节方式；同时，孩子调节情绪的方式也可以影响父、母的反应方式。6. 男生与父、母之间的相互影响多于女生与父、母间的相互影响。7. 父亲自主支持式的回应对高中生的情绪调节方式没有预测作用。母亲自主支持的反应方式对男生有帮助，对女生无帮助。8. 父亲条件关注式的回应预测了男生情绪的压抑。父亲或母亲条件关注式的回应预测了女生情绪的不可控。9. 只有整合型的情绪调节方式可正向预测人际亲密能力。10. 男生健康的情绪调节方式预测了父、母以健康的方式（自主支持）回应其消极情绪。女生健康的情绪调节方式不会对父、母造成影响。男、女生不健康的情绪调节方式预测了父、母用不健康的方式（条件关注）回应其消极情绪。11. 对男生来说，来自于父亲的支持或来自于母亲的支持都可预测男生的人际亲密能力。但是对女生来说，只有母亲的支持能够预测她们的人际亲密能力。

The relationship between parents’ reactions to high school students’ negative emotions, high school students’ emotion regulation modes, and interpersonal capacity for intimacy was explored. 504 high school students completed three questionnaires, and Structural Equation Model was used to study these three variables’ relationship under three emotion conditions – sad, fear and anger. The main results were as follows:1. Under three emotion conditions, boys were more suppressive than girls.2. Girls’ capacity for intimacy was better than boys’.3. Parents were more autonomy-supportive to girls’ negative emotions than to boys’; Parents were more conditional to boys’ negative emotions than to girls’.4. Under different emotion conditions, boys’ models were different; Under different emotion conditions, girls’ models were different; Under the same emotion condition, boys’ and girls’ model were different too.5. Parents’ reactions to high school students’ negative emotions and high school students’ emotion regulation modes had bidirectional relationship. It means Parents’ reactions would predict students’ emotion regulation modes, at the same time, students’ emotion regulation modes could predict parents’ reactions too.6. The paths between boys and parents were more than the paths between girls and parents.7. Fathers’ autonomy-supportive reactions could not predict high school students’ emotion regulation modes. Mothers’ autonomy-supportive reactions were helpful for boys, not for girls.8. Fathers’ conditional regard would predict boys’ suppression of negative emotions; Fathers’ or mothers’ conditional regard would predict girls’ dis-regulation of negative emotions.9. Only Integrative emotion regulation mode could predict the capacity for intimacy.10. Boys’ healthy emotion regulation mode predicted parents’ autonomy-supportive reactions. Girls’ healthy emotion regulation mode could not predict any parents’ reactions. Boys’ and girls’ unhealthy emotion regulation modes predicted parents’ conditional regard.11. For boys, both fathers’ and mothers’ autonomy-supportive reactions could predict their capacity for intimacy. But for girls, only mothers’ autonomy-supportive reactions could predict their capacity for intimacy.