本文在已有研究的基础上，运用统计分析和Goldberg 构式语法理论及其相关理论，对现代汉语存在构式进行类型分析，归纳了四类存在构式，本文将该四类构式命名为A类存在构式：[NL + V + 着 + NP]；B类存在构式[（在）NL +（有）NP + V + 着]；C类存在构式[（有）NP +（在）+ NL + V + 着]；D类存在构式[（有）NP + V +（在）+ NL]。它们结构成分相同，但是其结构顺序不同，因而每个构式所表示的整体意义有所差别，但是它们之间存在共同语义特征，既“存在”。本文根据所形成构式的不同情况，还将给存在动词分四类。Ⅰ类动词主要有“垂、坐”等；Ⅱ类动词主要有“倒、结”、“立、挂”等；Ⅲ类动词主要有“写、种”等；Ⅳ类动词有“跑、飘”等。本文主要用词汇语义框架及语义范畴特征表述动词义，并同时用事件框架表述构式论元结构，归纳每类构式的特征并概括其整体意义。主要探讨动词参与者角色和构式论元角色的侧重及整合，动词义和构式义的呼应，从中描写并论证了动词与构式的互动关系。最后揭开和说明了不同存在构式之间的关系。

This paper comes up with 4 types of “exist – construction” (or “being-construction”) sentences through typological analysis for modern Chinese existential sentence based on Goldberg’s construction grammar and applications of related theories. Although each construction clause shares the identical components, their locations in a sentence are quite different causing different semantic features. However, there is one significant aspect in common, which is the fact that each construction means “existence or being” either of an object or an individual asserting unchanging existential state as exist - construction sentences. This research classifies existential verbs depending on different kinds of construction sentences and eventually demonstrates meanings of each verb under in-depth analysis of lexical semantic schema and semantic category features. At the same time, it puts argument structure of construction in more definite shape by making use of event schema to induce and arrange various features and contextual meanings of each existential construction clause. Besides, this research paper describes and reasons on interactions between verbs and construction sentences by means of careful study on the process of profiling and syncretizing participant roles and argument roles.