楼钥所著《北行日录》与范成大所著《揽辔录》是存世极少的南宋使金行程录中的典范作品，两部作品皆为日记体例。这两部书所记时间一致，皆在乾道六年（1170）成书；行经路线基本一致，现存两部作品的传本中皆记有自泗州（南宋与金国边界）至金中都（金朝国都）沿途见闻。但是两部作品记载的内容却并不重复，叙述风格更是迥异。以往学者多关注南宋使金行程录的总体文体特征，将现可见名目的语录、日录，行记等作品统一视为官方“出使报告”，未能深入探讨这两部重要作品的独特性。实际上两部作品并非都是“出使报告”，本文对两部作品进行比较研究，从其日记体例，文本内容与文本所呈现的思想意识等角度来对比分析，以进一步理解两部作品的所属类别与主要价值侧重。

The Itineraries about mission from the Southern Song Dynasty to Jin State are rarely preserving, A Diary of Northbound Trip and Lan Pei Record are typical and important in this kind of writing. The two books were write in the same time, recorded approximately identical route, and included travelogue form Si Subprefecture(泗州) to Central Capital of Jin(金中都). But there is no repetition of the two books’ content, and the narrative styles of them are also different. Scholars paid more attention to the general stylistic features of the Itineraries mentioned above, regarded all this kind of writing as “official report of mission” and without more detailed division. In fact, the two works are typical of different types, A Diary of Northbound Trip is personal diary of Lou Yue, and Lan Pei Record is a combination of private records and official reports. This paper will demonstrate the above views from the points text style, content category and the affective space of text presentation.