- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力测评研究    

姓名:

 徐冠兴    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 中文    

学科代码:

 04010002    

学科专业:

 02学科素养测评与提升(040100)    

学生类型:

 博士    

学位:

 教育学博士    

学位类型:

 学术学位    

学位年度:

 2022    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心    

研究方向:

 语言测试与评价    

第一导师姓名:

 刘坚    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心    

提交日期:

 2022-06-17    

答辩日期:

 2022-06-09    

外文题名:

 ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-SCHOOL EFL LEARNERS’ INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE    

中文关键词:

 高中英语学习者 ; 跨文化沟通能力 ; 测评框架 ; 交互式任务 ; 效度验证 ; 表现研究    

外文关键词:

 High-school EFL learners ; Intercultural Communicative Competence ; assessment framework ; interactive assessment tasks ; validation ; students’ performance analysis    

中文摘要:
    跨文化沟通能力是有效而得体地与异文化和语言的他者进行互动交流时所应具备的能力集合(Fantini, 2006)。培养青少年学生的跨文化沟通能力是全球化时代的应然诉求,也是应对文明间的冲突、构建人类命运共同体的必然要求。
    培养跨文化沟通能力是外语教学的重要目标,但在基础教育阶段尚未引起广泛关注。鉴于此,文章选取高中学段作为研究对象,基于国内外相关理论研究与实践探索,对高中英语学习者的跨文化沟通能力的内涵框架与评价方式展开探讨。主要研究问题包括:(1)高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力的测评框架是什么?(2)用什么工具来实现对高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力的有效测评?(3)高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力测试的分数解释与使用的效度如何?(4)高中英语学习者在跨文化沟通能力测试中的表现如何?
    在测评框架构建环节,结合不同学者对跨文化沟通能力内涵模型与框架要素的相关研究和普通高中英语课程标准,在吸收中华优秀传统文化中的“和合”思想的基础上,初步构建了以和合思想为统领的高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力测评框架,并经由两轮德尔菲专家判断以及一轮专家深度访谈,最终形成涵盖3个一级维度(跨文化沟通态度、跨文化认知与跨文化践行)、9个二级维度(积极、尊重、自信、国家认同、差异理解、文化反思、一般信息交流、文化信息传递、争议问题处理)以及17个构成要素的测评框架。
    在工具开发环节,基于已构建的评价框架,经过规划、设计、任务实现、试测、修订完善等多个阶段,开发出一套与测评框架相对应、模拟真实跨文化沟通情境、并通过第三方H5平台实现的人机交互式测评任务系统。系统通过呈现动态图像、声音、文字,引导学生以沉浸式的方式,实现与不同场景任务的互动,并完成作答过程。测试任务经过多轮学生访谈、专家审核及试测修订后,经经典测验理论和单维项目反应模型的检验,具有较好的测量学指标。
    在效度验证环节,基于BachmanPalmer2010)提出的“测试使用论证”(AUA)框架,构建了适用于高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力测试分数解释和使用的效度验证框架,并以此开展效度论证工作。通过为四个环节二十项效度理据提供证据支持,完成对测试分数解释与使用合理性的论证。
    在表现研究环节,依托测评工具获取T400余名高中二年级学生的作答表现,通过对学生的总体表现、不同语言能力水平学生在跨文化沟通能力不同维度上的表现分析,结果显示,学生整体在跨文化沟通能力测试中的表现较好,但在跨文化践行维度的表现水平低于态度与认知维度;女生在“积极”的态度以及“争议问题处理”维度的表现显著优于男生;引入高考英语成绩作为表征学生语言能力的变量后发现,语言能力高的组别整体上在跨文化沟通能力上的表现更好,但语言能力高的学生在跨文化沟通能力各维度上的表现并不一定高,这进一步印证,语言能力是跨文化沟通能力的基础,但并非决定因素。学生表现水平经聚类分析后由低至高可描述为“消极型沟通者”“被动型沟通者”和“建设型沟通者”三类。
    本研究的创新主要体现在三方面:第一,理论创新:通过引入东方视角下的“和合”思想,构建出以和合思想为统领、涵盖三个一级维度、九个二级维度、十七个组成要素的高中英语学习者跨文化沟通能力测评框架。该框架可应用到日常的外语课堂,为教师的教和学生的学提供指导。第二,实践创新:开发了基于互联网平台和模拟真实跨文化沟通情境的人机交互式测试任务系统,并对工具使用的效度进行了论证。测试任务形式拓展了现阶段我国基础外语教育领域中的评价工具,可协助教师获取更为丰富、全面的关于学生跨文化沟通能力发展水平的信息。第三,方法创新:测评任务从场景设计到选项设计,均体现出“评价即是学习”的理念,作答过程可转化为一次有趣的跨文化学习过程。这为开展跨文化教学提供了新的思路和方法,具有实践引领作用。
    囿于时间和资源等条件限制,本研究还存在诸多不足:如表现研究的样本因采用方便抽样而不可避免存在偏差,在一定程度上影响了对结果的解释;测试框架和测试任务的质量还可进一步提升;基于能力测试获取学生态度信息的方式还需深入探讨;部分任务的评分指南与操作流程还需进一步细化;平台的稳定性仍需提升等。这也为后续的持续研究提供了广阔的探索空间。研究者希望以此为出发点,不断拓展研究广度和深度,为国内基础教育阶段学生的跨文化沟通能力培养提供更有价值的参考信息。
外文摘要:

Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) is a complex of abilities needed to perform “effectively” and “appropriately” when interacting with others who are linguistically and culturally different from oneself (Fantini, 2006). Developing teenage learners’ ICC is essential in the era of globalization for not only facilitating communication across cultures, but also settling conflicts between different civilizations and building a community with a shared future for mankind.

      Scant attention has been paid to developing Chinese learners’ ICC in high school English classrooms although ICC should be indispensable to foreign language teaching. Based on the theoretical frameworks and empirical studies at home and abroad, this dissertation aims to examine the essential components of ICC and the assessment of ICC for high-school EFL learners in China. Four research questions guided this study:
(1) What is the framework to assess high-school EFL learners’ ICC? (2) What test to assess high-school EFL learners’ ICC? (3) What are the evidences to support the validity of score interpretation and use of the ICC test? (4) What are the results of the ICC test?

      For Research Question 1, a tentative assessment framework enlightened by the traditional Chinese philosophy of Harmony and Coexistence was proposed based on a review of relevant literature at home and abroad. After two rounds of expert judgment with the use of the Delphi method and one round of in-depth interviews with expert teachers and professionals, a final version of the assessment framework was formulated. The framework comprises three primary dimensions (i.e., affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions) and nine secondary sub-dimensions (i.e., a positive attitude, respect, self-confidence, the recognition of national identity, the understanding of cultural differences, the reflection of different cultures, the ability to exchange general information, the ability to convey cultural messages, and the ability to resolve dispute or misunderstandings). These nine sub-dimensions include 17 key traits.

      For Research Question 2, an internet based testing platform which simulates the real-life intercultural communication tasks and encourages the interaction between the examinees and the tasks is developed through multiple stages of planning, design, task realization, field tests, and revision. With the use of cartoon images, sounds, and scripts, the platform guides students to interact with various tasks in an immersive way and provides answers on the screen before the students complete the testing process. After several rounds of student interviews, expert review and test revision, these tasks have been proved to possess quality psychometric properties based on the analysis under the classical testing theory and the item response model.

       For Research Question 3, the Assessment Use Argument (AUA) model put forward by Bachman and Palmer (2010) was applied to develop a validation framework. Evidences from four different aspects were collected to support the score interpretation and use for 20 warrants to justify the proper use of the ICC test.

        For Research Question 4, results of the ICC test with over 400 Grade 11 students from T city revealed that: (a) the overall performance of students in the ICC test is fairly good, but the performance level in the behavioral dimension is lower than those in the affective and cognitive dimensions; (b) The performance of girls in the sub-dimensions of positive attitude and dispute settlement is significantly better than that of boys; (c) The group with high language ability performs better on ICC as a whole, but the performance of some individual students with high language ability is not necessarily high in all dimensions of ICC, which further confirms that language ability is the basis of ICC but not the most
decisive factor; (d) students’ performance levels can be classified into three types, which can be labelled as “a negative communicator”, “a passive communicator” and “a constructive communicator”.

      This study contributes to the field of ICC research in the following aspects. First, a theoretical framework based on the traditional Chinese philosophy of Harmony and Coexistence and comprised of three primary dimensions and nine sub-dimensions was developed to assess high-school EFL learners’ ICC, which filled in the gap of relevant research in
K-12 and can be further applied by foreign language teachers to guide their classroom teaching and assessment. Second, an internet based testing platform which simulates the real-life intercultural communication tasks and encourages the interaction between the examinees and the tasks was developed and innovated the assessment tools in foreign language education in K-12 in China and will be of benefit for teachers to obtain richer information on the development of
students’ ICC. Finally, this study may transform the testing process into an interesting cross-cultural learning experience with the adoption of the concept of “assessment as learning” in the process of scenario and task design, which provides a new method for teaching ICC.

      However, there are still some limitations in this research. For example, the system error caused by the convenience sampling of examinees in the stage of performance analysis may produce biased result. The quality of the assessment framework and test tasks need to be further refined and the ways to obtain students’ attitude information based on achievement test need to be further explored. The scoring procedures of constructed response tasks need to be more clearly designed, and the stability of the testing platform needs to be improved. These limitations call for future research to obtain results that are more meaningful and to provide more guidance to both teachers and students in their process of ICC teaching and learning.

参考文献总数:

 284    

作者简介:

 徐冠兴,天津市教育招生考试院副研究员;研究方向为基础教育阶段英语测试与评价;在学期间发表CSSCI核心期刊论文7篇,其中第一作者2篇;参编著作1部。    

馆藏地:

 图书馆学位论文阅览区(主馆南区三层BC区)    

馆藏号:

 博040100-02/22001    

开放日期:

 2023-06-17    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式