新发展阶段，我国电子竞技产业成为体育产业和数字经济的新增长点。产业融合已经成为产业发展进一步提质增效的重要手段，电子竞技产业与相关产业的融合发展为电子竞技产业高质量发展提供新动能。本研究重点关注电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业的融合特征及影响因素，旨在更好激发电子竞技产业的辐射带动能力，增强区域经济发展活力，为新质生产力培育提供范本。

本研究对电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合的相关文献进行梳理，随后对我国电子竞技产业发展历程进行阶段划分，指出我国电子竞技产业融合背景和现状。后通过运用产业融合理论和产业链理论，分析了我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合机制及融合过程中展现的基本特征。并进一步运用产业集群理论，结合ArcGIS地理测算法深入分析了我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业的空间格局演化特征。最后，通过地理探测器和Tobit模型探讨得出影响我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合特征的主要因素。在此基础上，指出我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合发展存在问题，并对我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合发展的提出建议。

本研究主要结论如下：①我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合基本特征为：以科技创新为动力；以市场驱动为导向；以互动融合为主要类型。②我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合空间格局演化特征主要为：呈现出显著的集聚特征，集聚强度随时间持续增强；形成了以中部省会城市如西安、成都等为核心的稳定高密度集聚区；省会城市与周边城市的差异在不断扩大。③影响我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合情况的主要因素为：学校数量、科技水平、电子竞技发展水平、文化娱乐业发展水平等。④我国电子竞技产业与酒店住宿业融合发展主要存在以下问题：短期快速融合引起监管漏洞，市场监管效率不足；融合发展情况区域差异较大，产物形态单一；融合经济成本相对较高，产品创新空间有限。

为更好促进电子竞技产业和酒店住宿业融合发展，本研究提出以下建议：应选取适合不同融合阶段的经营模式；加强新兴融合产品政策监管；拓宽融合产业链形态实现可持续发展；加强科技创新力度提升融合空间。

In the new stage of development, China's e-sports industry has become a new growth point for the sports industry and digital economy. Industrial integration has become an essential means to further improve the quality and efficiency of industrial development, and the integrated development of the e-sports industry with related industries provides new momentum for the high-quality development of the e-sports industry. This research focuses on the integration characteristics and influencing factors of the e-sports industry and the hotel industry, aiming to better stimulate the radiation and driving ability of the e-sports industry, enhance the vitality of regional economic development, and provide a model for the cultivation of new productive forces.

This research first combs through the relevant literature on the integration of the e-sports industry and the hotel industry, and then divides the development process of the e-sports industry into stages, pointing out the background and current status of e-sports industry integration. By applying industrial integration theory and industrial chain theory, this research analyzes the integration mechanism between China's e-sports industry and the hotel industry as well as the basic characteristics exhibited during the integration process. Furthermore, this research employs industrial cluster theory and combines ArcGIS geographic analysis algorithms to deeply analyze the spatial pattern evolution characteristics of China's e-sports industry and hotel industry. Finally, through the use of geographic detectors and Tobit models, this research explores and identifies the main factors influencing the integration characteristics of China's e-sports industry and hotel industry. Based on this, it points out the existing problems in the integrated development of China's e-sports industry and hotel industry and proposes countermeasures and suggestions for their integrated development..

The main conclusions of this study are as follows: ① The basic characteristics of the integration between China's e-sports industry and hotel industry are: taking technological innovation as the key integration driving force; taking market-driven as the main integration orientation; and taking interactive integration as the core integration type.  ② The evolution characteristics of the spatial pattern of integration between China's e-sports industry and hotel industry mainly show significant clustering features, and the clustering intensity continues to increase over time; stable high-density clustering areas centered on provincial capital cities in the central region, such as Xi'an and Chengdu, have been formed; and the differences between provincial capital cities and surrounding cities are constantly expanding. ③ The main factors affecting the degree of integration between China's e-sports industry and hotel industry are the number of schools, technological level, the development level of e-sports, and the development level of cultural and entertainment industries. ④ The main problems in the integrated development of China's e-sports industry and hotel industry are as follows: short-term rapid integration leads to regulatory loopholes and insufficient market supervision efficiency; significant regional differences in the level of integrated development and a single product form; relatively high economic costs of integration, and limited space for product innovation.

The main suggestions proposed for these problems are as follows: selecting business models suitable for different stages of integration; strengthening policy supervision of emerging integrated products; and broadening the forms of integrated industrial chains to achieve sustainable development;and enhancing technological innovation to expand integration space.