二十一世纪以来，“70后”作家们凭借日趋成熟的优秀作品逐渐成为当代文坛的中坚力量。首先，现有的研究对“70后”作家小说的艺术特色、叙事特点等具体问题或对“70后”作家的个案分析较多，而对这代作家在作品中所呈现的美学风貌、精神追求和写作立场及其思想来源等宏观性、整体性的讨论与把握较少；其次，“70后”的成长史与中国城镇化进程有着众多重合点，“70后”作家在城乡嬗变中的位置意味他们承担着改革开放以来城乡变动下密度最大、时间也最紧急的书写使命，他们对于城与乡的关注和共同书写，表达了他们对于时代之变的共同感受，也体现了共同的美学倾向，其创作在中国现当代文学史城乡叙事脉络中的位置与关系，也理应进行讨论。“70后”作家的评价与研究亟需随着“70后”群体创作日益重要的文学史地位而展开。

本文试图在挖掘“70后”一代创作的内部丰富度的基础上，再从总体上进行概览，聚焦“70后”作家小说的创作特征，并思索代际整体上这一代人的精神境遇。全文共分为五个部分，绪论把作为“身份共同体”的“70后”置于当代文学发展史中研究的合法性进行了言说，并梳理了与本论文相关的“70后”作家小说研究，介绍了研究方法与研究意义。第一章从书写空间的流动性综观“70后”作家小说“归去来”式的城乡叙事。他们构架了多元的文学阵地，在多向凝眸中对应着“流动的现代性”下的变化，构建“表征性空间”下的空间诗学，形成了“小城镇叙事”等中间形态，并打通“边界”，以“到世界去”的视界延申，建立了“乡村”“城市”和“世界”的关联。第二章观察“70后”作家小说的叙事姿态。“70后”作家试图以文学实践将城乡变动之下的破碎经验黏合起来，以物性作为中介的间性表达，构建一种新的整体性视野，将“整体性”中的“地方性”知识进行有力地呈现，力图黏合历史经验上的断裂；他们以散点透视法刻画城镇化历史进程中的“浮世绘”，深化了“日常书写”；“70后”女性作家与男性作家的性别书写是时代镜像的独奏与共鸣，以集体性的叙述映照着众生喧哗。第三章论述城乡视域中“70后”作家的精神境遇。近年来，“70后”作家小说中的精神思考愈发成熟，在对城与乡的思考中，展现了他们“主体性”建构由隐到显的心路历程。但历时回顾“70后”作家的小说创作，可以发现他们有着“因袭的重担”，即仍处于前代作家城乡书写的精神谱系之中，有着文化心态下的精神藩篱，“游弋”与“悬浮”成为他们叙事上的精神限度。结语部分对城乡视域中“70后”作家的小说创作进行了总结，并分析了这一代人精神症候的形成原因。

从城乡视域角度看去，“70后”作家空间叙事只是一种呈现手段，表达一代人独有的生命体验与文化立场才是目的。“70后”作家在城乡之间来与回、往与返式的自我重复中不停地撕扯着自己的灵魂，倾诉自己独特且复杂的、属于一代人的精神状况与灵魂图景。

Since the 21st century, writers born in the 1970s have gradually become the backbone of contemporary literature with their increasingly mature and outstanding works.Firstly, existing research has focused more on specific issues such as the artistic and narrative characteristics of the novels of "post 70s" writers, or on case studies of "post 70s" writers. However, there is less discussion and grasp of the macro and overall aesthetic style, spiritual pursuit, writing stance, and ideological sources presented by this generation of writers in their works.Secondly, there are many overlap points between the growth history of the "post-70s" and the urbanization process in China. The position of the "post-70s" writers in the urban-rural transformation means that they undertake the writing mission with the highest density and most urgent time under the urban-rural changes since the reform and opening up. Their attention to and joint writing of cities and towns express their common feelings about the changes in the times and also reflect a common aesthetic tendency, The position and relationship of his creation in the urban and rural narrative context of modern and contemporary Chinese literary history should also be discussed. The evaluation and research of "post 70s" writers urgently need to be carried out in response to the increasingly important literary history status of the "post 70s" group.

This article attempts to explore the internal richness of the creation of the "70s" generation, and then provide an overall overview, focusing on the creative characteristics of the "post-70s’ writers’" novels, and contemplating the overall spiritual situation of this generation across generations. The full text is divided into five parts. The introduction discusses the legitimacy of the "post-70s" as a "community of identity" in the development history of contemporary literature, and summarizes the research on the "post-70s" writers and novels related to this paper, introducing research methods and significance. The first chapter takes a comprehensive view of the urban and rural narrative of the "Return" style in the novels of post-70s writers from the perspective of the fluidity of writing space. They have constructed diverse literary platforms, corresponding to the changes under the "flowing modernity" in their multi-directional gaze, and carried out complex experiential expressions, bridging the "boundaries", forming intermediate forms such as "small town narratives", and extending from the perspective of "going to the world", establishing the connection between "hometown", "city", and "world". Chapter 2 observes the narrative posture of the novels of post-70s writers. The post-70s writers attempted to use literary practice to bond the fragmented experiences under urban-rural changes, using material properties as an intermediary to express inter sex, constructing a new holistic perspective, presenting the "local" knowledge in the "holistic" effectively, and striving to adhere to the historical experience fractures; They use scattered perspective to depict "Ukiyoyo" in the process of urbanization history, deepening "daily writing"; The gender writing of female and male writers born in the 1970s is a solo and resonance of the mirror image of the times, reflecting the clamor of sentient beings with collective narratives. The third chapter discusses the spiritual situation of post-70s writers from the perspective of urban and rural areas. In recent years, the spiritual thinking in the novels of post-70s writers has become increasingly mature, showcasing their psychological process of constructing their "subjectivity" from concealment to manifestation in their contemplation of cities and towns. However, looking back at the novel creations of post- 70s’ writers, it can be found that they have a "hereditary burden", that is, they are still in the spiritual lineage of the previous generation's urban and rural writing, with a spiritual barrier in emotional ambiguity. "Wandering" and "floating" have become the spiritual limits of their narrative. The conclusion summarizes the novel creations of the "post-70s" writers from the perspective of urban and rural areas, and analyzes the reasons for the formation of spiritual symptoms in this generation.

From the perspective of urban and rural areas, the spatial narrative of writers born in the 1970s is only a means of presentation, and the purpose is to express the unique life experience and cultural stance of a generation. Writers born in the '70s' constantly tear apart their souls in the self repetition of back and forth between urban and rural areas, confiding in their unique and complex spiritual state and spiritual landscape belonging to a generation.